• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain why Britain did not join either the ECSC or the EEC in the 1950s but then changed its mind about Europe in the early 1960s.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Moritz Wiesel 16.03.2004 Explain why Britain did not join either the ECSC or the EEC in the 1950s but then changed its mind about Europe in the early 1960s The ECSC or European Coal and Steel Community was funded in 1952 it was born out of the Marshall plan and was aimed to coordinate the American aid among the west European countries involved in the Marshall plan. In 1955 the sic ECSC powers met in Rome and agreed the European Economic Community (EEC) and the European Atomic Community (Euratom) both bodies came into existence at the beginning of 1956 and started to function in 1959.The six countries involved agreed to eliminate tariffs between themselves, to establish a single tariff within 12 to 15 years , eliminate quotas , ensure mobility of labour and capital , ban anti-competitive cartels and abolish subsidies which failed to conform with their general liberalising policies. ...read more.

Middle

But Britain anyway did distrust the association with foreigners and had never felt herself to be part of Europe by virtue of her position as an offshore island. She wished to retain her close trading and sentimental links with Commonwealth countries. Britain argued that the EEC was a bureaucracy and not a democracy therefore an irresponsible form of government and the EEC was also devoted to free competition as opposed to planning and that entry into it meant abandoning national planning, not for international planning but for "laissez - faire". In case of an entry by the British the parliament would also have to renounce its control over vital aspects of British public businesses . Over all was the EEC an inward looking , Eurocentric organisation with un-British traditions such as multi-party government and Roman-Dutch law in which British civil servants would be at a disadvantage. ...read more.

Conclusion

the aftermath of the U2 incident and she also realised that a partnership in Europe might be preferable to dependence upon the USA. In addition did the strength of Commonwealth identity fade away as it grew in size and changed in colour with Asian and African former colonies such as Nigeria and Malaya joining the white former settler colonies of Canada, Australia , New Zealand and South Africa. Anyway the EEC appeared to be a great success and Britain's economy was weakened further and furthermore. So Britain began to have second thoughts about the EEC and eventually decided to make all efforts to join the other six countries and to enter the common market. Thus in August 1961 the Commons , with only twenty-two Conservative abstentions , approved Britain's application to join the EEC. Edward Heath then engaged in negotiations in Brussels until January 1963 when the French President de Gaulle unexpectedly vetoed the British application. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. Transformation of the U.S. Hegemony in Europe through NATO after the Cold War

    Moreover, some non-NATO members, i.e. Austria, Finland and Sweden, were gaining the initiative through WEU by "informally" joining NATO. This commitment also enforced U.S. to speed up its open door policy for the non-NATO but EU member candidate countries, i.e. Hungary, Czech Republic and Poland in 1990s, to join NATO.

  2. Why did the witch-craze happen in Early Modern Europe?

    The mere belief in witchcraft was not sufficient; it was the belief that they could harm others and reject their Christian faith that was the cause for concern. However, the question of how these ideas came into play still remains.

  1. Regulation 2560/2001 on cross-border payments in Europe.

    Additionally, this practice was very bothersome for customers. When they had to pay bills in the European area, they could never be sure how much they had to transfer exactly in order for the full amount to arrive at the beneficent.

  2. An examination of British policy with regard to European Unity during the period 1945 ...

    Croft argues that Britain was 'leading' Europe at a time when it was in its own interests to do so. British policy had been devised primarily for the threats to its own security and stability and largely ignored the fears of France with respect to Germany.

  1. Why did many British colonies demand independence from Britain in the years immediately after ...

    Indians were also increasingly angry because of what happened in the Anritsar massecar. There was a large unarmed crowed gathered in the Jalianwalla bagh, an open space enclosed by walls. Dyer marched with so soldiers to the scene and without ordering the crowed to move, he lined his men

  2. Is Europe a Bargaining Forum?

    nation-states: policy making decisions are actually formed also at the Community-level, and this level has a fundamental influence on the associated states.4 The EC clearly contains elements of both intergovernmentalism and supranationalism: the Commission, from the start, as well as the EC Court of Justice, clearly had a supranational character,

  1. UK agriculture and its dependence on Europe.

    Similarly some of our best loved wildlife has declined: for example, corn bunting down 83%, willow tit down 69% and skylark down 53% in the last 30 years Agri-environment schemes were established in the UK in the late 1980's to encourage farmers to manage their land in more environmentally friendly ways.

  2. Why did Britain join the EEC in 1973 and not in 1957?

    By not getting involved in these initial talks Britain failed to join the ECSC, which meant they would have no involvement in the talks at Messina. By not joining the 'Six' they could not share their quick development and could not shape it to suit Britain, Europe began to develop in what Britain saw as a negative way.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work