• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Fascism Can Largely Be Defined By What It Opposes. Discuss.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Fascism Can Largely Be Defined By What It Opposes, Discuss. (30 Marks) Fascism is a system of government marked by centralisation of authority under a dictator, stringent socioeconomic controls, suppression of the opposition through terror and censorship, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racialism. Whilst fascism is by no means apparent in the same extent as it was decades ago, there are still elements of fascism within today's society. In many ways, yes, fascism can be defined by exactly what it opposes. Fascist's are opposed to that of equality which is seen as a very Liberal idea, it's all about being equal in rights and opportunities. Everybody is entitled to that of free healthcare and education and nobody is subject to discrimination. On the contrast, fascists are for the cycle of elites, an idea that Vilfredo Pareto very much felt true. ...read more.

Middle

Socialism is a political and economic theory of social organisation that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole. It is concerned with working class discrimination internationally and unites people in various countries. This is something that fascism doesn't favour. Instead they oppose and take the nationalism approach which is all about creating a national unity and identity. A further idea that fascists oppose is intellectualism, it is all about action over talking and theories and this is very much against what fascists live for. Alfred Rosenbourg was intellectual and outcast by that of the Nazis. In contrary, fascists go by the idea of romanticism and mythology which is the creating of myths to create a greater nation. It's about dynamic leaders with dynamic actions. As a fascist you would be against the idea that everybody has the right to certain things and freedom of speech. ...read more.

Conclusion

They were worried that upper classes and working classes conflicting interests would lead to strikes. Corporatism gets those working together for the good of the nation. Corporatism is neither nationalisation nor free market capitalism. It is a half way house in the middle. In Italy there were twenty two regions ad trade unions and business elites were forced to sign contracts which meant that any disputes were signed by the leaders and the state was going to insure that those contracts were honoured and checked. If there was any case of dispute, officials with batons would sort out the problems. To conclude, fascism can be largely defined by what it opposes. It rejects democracy and capitalism amongst other key factors and constitutes that of a state run by one sole individual with people being superior to others. For every fascist core value there is an anti-value which largely confirms the fact it is exactly what it opposes. Everything fascism isn't is in a sense exactly what fascism is. Holly Whiteside ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. How and why does Locke explain the creation, value and protection of property?

    second type of equality however, would entail the taking of resources from families that are financially well off and distributing it to other families to ensure that every member of the society starts out with the wealth as everyone else.

  2. 'Socialists have disagreed on both the means and ends of socialism' - Discuss

    Social democracy is based more on moral or religious beliefs than scientific analysis. Whereas Marxism was based on materialism and claimed to discover the laws of historical and social development, social democracy is more utopian and is based on the belief that humans are bound together by ties of love, sympathy and compassion.

  1. Communism VS Democracy

    At the next level, it gives the individual the capital necessary to give financial support to the groups to which he or she belonged, so they could collectively raise support through lobbying or the mass media for their cause. On the third level, the behavior of providing financial support to

  2. Notes on John Stuart Mill's On Liberty

    are some possible laws which are paternalistic, but which do actually maximize utility. These seem totally incompatible, but they are not. Take a few minute to make sure that you see the apparent incompatibility before you read on. I'm totally serious, stop reading!

  1. Main features of fascism

    In the table shown below is some difference between Fascism and Communism since they both were considered as extreme ideologies: Fascism Communism Did not believe in democracy as it was a sign of weakness Believed in democracy as a theory but emphzised in economic and social equality Capitalism was highly

  2. To what extent was Fascist Italy the bastard child of Liberal Italy?

    This whole process of unification, though discussed and dreamt up by several Italians such as Garibaldi and Mazzini, was a sham as there was such little success on the part of the Italians themselves that their whole unification was down to the intervention/assistance of foreign powers.

  1. What exactly is religion?

    After all didnotJesus die on the cross, did not God give up his only Son, so why should people not accept their sufferings. This attitude is still to be found amongst many of the religious. It used to be very common, for example, you had Nuns and Monks going without

  2. Participation is the essence of democracy Discuss

    They also claimed that most people voted sporadically. There are many types of participations such as; becoming a member of a political party, protests, petitions, boycotting, being an MP, debates and joining a pressure groups. Edmund Burke a famous Irish political philosopher argued that participation is the key.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work