• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Fascism Can Largely Be Defined By What It Opposes. Discuss.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Fascism Can Largely Be Defined By What It Opposes, Discuss. (30 Marks) Fascism is a system of government marked by centralisation of authority under a dictator, stringent socioeconomic controls, suppression of the opposition through terror and censorship, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racialism. Whilst fascism is by no means apparent in the same extent as it was decades ago, there are still elements of fascism within today's society. In many ways, yes, fascism can be defined by exactly what it opposes. Fascist's are opposed to that of equality which is seen as a very Liberal idea, it's all about being equal in rights and opportunities. Everybody is entitled to that of free healthcare and education and nobody is subject to discrimination. On the contrast, fascists are for the cycle of elites, an idea that Vilfredo Pareto very much felt true. ...read more.

Middle

Socialism is a political and economic theory of social organisation that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole. It is concerned with working class discrimination internationally and unites people in various countries. This is something that fascism doesn't favour. Instead they oppose and take the nationalism approach which is all about creating a national unity and identity. A further idea that fascists oppose is intellectualism, it is all about action over talking and theories and this is very much against what fascists live for. Alfred Rosenbourg was intellectual and outcast by that of the Nazis. In contrary, fascists go by the idea of romanticism and mythology which is the creating of myths to create a greater nation. It's about dynamic leaders with dynamic actions. As a fascist you would be against the idea that everybody has the right to certain things and freedom of speech. ...read more.

Conclusion

They were worried that upper classes and working classes conflicting interests would lead to strikes. Corporatism gets those working together for the good of the nation. Corporatism is neither nationalisation nor free market capitalism. It is a half way house in the middle. In Italy there were twenty two regions ad trade unions and business elites were forced to sign contracts which meant that any disputes were signed by the leaders and the state was going to insure that those contracts were honoured and checked. If there was any case of dispute, officials with batons would sort out the problems. To conclude, fascism can be largely defined by what it opposes. It rejects democracy and capitalism amongst other key factors and constitutes that of a state run by one sole individual with people being superior to others. For every fascist core value there is an anti-value which largely confirms the fact it is exactly what it opposes. Everything fascism isn't is in a sense exactly what fascism is. Holly Whiteside ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Main features of fascism

    adopted and fully under government control They eliminated capitalism Very nationalistic and ignored social classes Supported social class and was internationalized and fight for the working class struggle Extremely imperialistic and supported war No war support and did not believe in imperialism Adopted Racial intolerance 100% Did not believe in

  2. How and why does Locke explain the creation, value and protection of property?

    Evidence of this can be seen in the necessity by the UN to create two human right covenants; The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, and The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. The reason that Locke and people down the ages have problems in using the

  1. 'Socialists have disagreed on both the means and ends of socialism' - Discuss

    It is also true that orthodox communism is linked with revolutionary socialism, as this is modelled on the Soviet version of socialism which began with the Russian Revolution of 1917. It stands to reason that if there is so much difference in the types of socialism achieved through revolution, an

  2. Notes on John Stuart Mill's On Liberty

    Mill's consistent answer: Mill recognizes that it is practically impossible to calculate utilities of citizens, so government cannot make decisions by directly applying the principles of utilitarianism (just as individuals cannot do so). Thus, government must use some other principles to rule well.

  1. Communism VS Democracy

    step down is democracy, which at least provides for a limitation on this level freedom that could possibly restrict the freedom of others, if the majority are rational and insist that the actions of those who would limit freedom be restrained themselves.

  2. Marxism, Idealism and Nationalism

    Black Americans were given equal political and civil status. Many whites were against this equality and were willing to resort to violence and even murder to counter this. Since they could not openly oppose the government, they created an undercover group the Ku-Klux Klan. This violent group had no limits when it came to what they would do to both Black Americans and Whites who believed in equality.

  1. The development of fascist doctrine.

    He seemed to argue that the only law binding upon the individual was a law which the individual laid upon himself. He specifically committed himself to opposing submission to laws having any other origin. Yet, by 1908, he was prepared to admit the real theoretical difficulty in defending such a position.

  2. Participation is the essence of democracy Discuss

    Participation was definitely important for democracy to take place. In Zimbabwe, the right to vote is important but the right to vote is not an option. In Zimbabwe, many people are killed and many fight for survival.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work