• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Federal principles grow out of the idea that free people can liberally enter into lasting yet limited political associations to achieve common ends and protect certain rights while preserving their respective integrities.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Federal principles grow out of the idea that free people can liberally enter into lasting yet limited political associations to achieve common ends and protect certain rights while preserving their respective integrities. Daniel J. Elazar explains this point particularly well although in a rather non-political way when he states that federalism is rather like 'wanting to have one's cake and eat it.'1 But what kind of a cake was it? The dual system has been described as a layer cake, with distinct, and separated powers exercised by the different levels of government, but David Walker proposes that the plums that characterize shared programs under fiscal federalism suggest a fruitcake2, and Wildavsky adds the image of a birthday cake to the metaphorical menu3. A very different approach to defining federalism is James Bryce's slant; he likened federalism to "a great factory wherein two sets of machinery are at work...each doing its own work without touching or hampering the other"4 were the two sets of machinery are state and local government. ...read more.

Middle

taxation.7 The first step towards devolution was Nixon's New Federalism which emphasized revenue sharing, underlining the notion that the states were being returned authority over their own funds, not granted license to spend federal money. Federal administration was decentralized; with greater authority granted to field office administrators8 Reagan's block grant approach was also aimed at the plethora of categorical grants, but gave more emphasis to shifting responsibility for programmatic choices, while still maintaining a federal claim of accountability for the funds. The limited success of each of these efforts was quickly lost as grants were re-categorized and entitlements grew. Courts also exercised a centralizing tendency in these decades, interpreting the Commerce Clause expansively. As soaring federal deficits and the politics of balanced budgets curtailed the growth of new national spending, Congress became increasingly willing to impose federal mandates on states either through the vehicle of existing grant programs or indirect requirements. Devolution efforts went full steam ahead under President Clinton who came to power with a decentralizing agenda. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Republican agenda of "devolution revolution"12 was not as successful as they had envisioned. The Republicans, with their stringent budget and plans to devolve federal power exceeded their electorate mandate. Timothy Conlan notes that the agenda may have worked if the Republicans controlled the White House as well as Congress13. They did not have such control so their revolution was doomed once Clinton became convinced that most Americans were highly sceptical of the program. 1 Elazar, 1991: 1 2 Walker, David B. The Rebirth of Federalism: Slouching toward Washington. Chatham House Publishers, Inc. 1995. 3 Wildavsky, Aaron. Federalism and Political Culture. D. Sleicher & B. Swedlow, Eds. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.1998. Cited in: McCurdy, Arthur H. "Political culture, local government and progressive personnel practices." Review of Public Personnel Administration, Columbia. Winter 1998Vol. 18, PP 23-38 4 www2.h-net.msu.edu/~shgape/bibs/federal.html 5 www.historylearningsite.co.uk/fed.htm 6 http://www.min.net/~kala/fed/history.htm 7 Conlon, T. 1998. From New Federalism to Devolution. The Brookings Institution 8 Walker, 1996:272. 9 Walker, 1996:196 10 http://nw.com/jamesd/libertarian-quotes, 11 www2.h-net.msu.edu/~shgape/bibs/federal.html 12 Conlon, T. 1998. From New Federalism to Devolution. The Brookings Institution 13 Conlon, T. 1998. From New Federalism to Devolution. The Brookings Institution ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Outline how and why federalism has changed since the 1960s.

    5 star(s)

    office he reduced it by $18 billion), and to input the swap system in which states had to fund two poverty reducing measures whilst the federal government would supply the medicare. Reducing federal aid created a sever problem for certain states; New York was effectively made bankrupt by the reductions

  2. How and Why has federalism changes sice the 1960s

    Reducing federal aid created a sever problem for certain states; New York as effectively made bankrupt, and the number of Americans living in poverty rose from 29 million to 35 million.

  1. Compare and contrast the extent to which the Cabinet has an important part to ...

    which is what would of happened had Clinton's budgetary proposals been passed. This led to the infamous 'government shutdown.' The PM is also able to keep the Cabinet in line and support his policy through what Tony Benn described as the most important power of the PM, the power of Patronage.

  2. Examine the Causes and Consequences of the changing balance of power between the federal ...

    calm and prosperity, the balance of power has shifted away from the federal government. This has had a number of consequences with the most obvious being that the states have gained more power. Examples of this are the 1995 Mandates reform Act and the 1996 Welfare reform Act which have both resulted in an increase in state power.

  1. Federalism vs. Devolution

    In Wales the vote was only very narrowly passed as a yes , so the Welsh have minor powers on controlling education, housing and councils. It is key to note that they do not have power to substantially alter taxes, making it a very weak devolved asseCHNKWKS 8� ����TEXTTEXTV/FDPPFDPP2FDPCFDPC4STSHSTSH6-STSHSTSH-6VSYIDSYIDt6SGP SGP

  2. Using Suetonius and Res Gestae, assess how effective Octavian was in enlisting Senatorial Support ...

    And indeed he achieved this success, having taken great trouble to prevent his political system from causing any individual distress." He now, however, did not have any consular imperium or sacrosanctity of a tribune, so the Senate gave him a proconsular imperium for a limited time: "...

  1. Assess the view that the US Constitution often ensures limited government

    The senate then run the trial. If found to have been involved in criminal activity by a two thirds majority, the accused can be removed from office. Only two presidents have been impeached, Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton. Both were acquitted by the Senate. This power of Congress stops any members of the judiciary or executive

  2. Is the USA still a federal state?

    One may identify that Obama?s presidency too reflected the growing strength of the federal government. The first year of the president?s terms witnessed the proliferation of a stimulus package through the passing of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. The $787 billion invested to the programme which later grew to

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work