• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Federal principles grow out of the idea that free people can liberally enter into lasting yet limited political associations to achieve common ends and protect certain rights while preserving their respective integrities.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Federal principles grow out of the idea that free people can liberally enter into lasting yet limited political associations to achieve common ends and protect certain rights while preserving their respective integrities. Daniel J. Elazar explains this point particularly well although in a rather non-political way when he states that federalism is rather like 'wanting to have one's cake and eat it.'1 But what kind of a cake was it? The dual system has been described as a layer cake, with distinct, and separated powers exercised by the different levels of government, but David Walker proposes that the plums that characterize shared programs under fiscal federalism suggest a fruitcake2, and Wildavsky adds the image of a birthday cake to the metaphorical menu3. A very different approach to defining federalism is James Bryce's slant; he likened federalism to "a great factory wherein two sets of machinery are at work...each doing its own work without touching or hampering the other"4 were the two sets of machinery are state and local government. ...read more.

Middle

taxation.7 The first step towards devolution was Nixon's New Federalism which emphasized revenue sharing, underlining the notion that the states were being returned authority over their own funds, not granted license to spend federal money. Federal administration was decentralized; with greater authority granted to field office administrators8 Reagan's block grant approach was also aimed at the plethora of categorical grants, but gave more emphasis to shifting responsibility for programmatic choices, while still maintaining a federal claim of accountability for the funds. The limited success of each of these efforts was quickly lost as grants were re-categorized and entitlements grew. Courts also exercised a centralizing tendency in these decades, interpreting the Commerce Clause expansively. As soaring federal deficits and the politics of balanced budgets curtailed the growth of new national spending, Congress became increasingly willing to impose federal mandates on states either through the vehicle of existing grant programs or indirect requirements. Devolution efforts went full steam ahead under President Clinton who came to power with a decentralizing agenda. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Republican agenda of "devolution revolution"12 was not as successful as they had envisioned. The Republicans, with their stringent budget and plans to devolve federal power exceeded their electorate mandate. Timothy Conlan notes that the agenda may have worked if the Republicans controlled the White House as well as Congress13. They did not have such control so their revolution was doomed once Clinton became convinced that most Americans were highly sceptical of the program. 1 Elazar, 1991: 1 2 Walker, David B. The Rebirth of Federalism: Slouching toward Washington. Chatham House Publishers, Inc. 1995. 3 Wildavsky, Aaron. Federalism and Political Culture. D. Sleicher & B. Swedlow, Eds. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.1998. Cited in: McCurdy, Arthur H. "Political culture, local government and progressive personnel practices." Review of Public Personnel Administration, Columbia. Winter 1998Vol. 18, PP 23-38 4 www2.h-net.msu.edu/~shgape/bibs/federal.html 5 www.historylearningsite.co.uk/fed.htm 6 http://www.min.net/~kala/fed/history.htm 7 Conlon, T. 1998. From New Federalism to Devolution. The Brookings Institution 8 Walker, 1996:272. 9 Walker, 1996:196 10 http://nw.com/jamesd/libertarian-quotes, 11 www2.h-net.msu.edu/~shgape/bibs/federal.html 12 Conlon, T. 1998. From New Federalism to Devolution. The Brookings Institution 13 Conlon, T. 1998. From New Federalism to Devolution. The Brookings Institution ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Outline how and why federalism has changed since the 1960s.

    5 star(s)

    in federal aid and increases in what they needed to supply, and the number of Americans living in poverty rose from 29 million to 35 million. His system of swaps also had many flaws; the states found the idea very attractive but it was clear that they would not be

  2. How and Why has federalism changes sice the 1960s

    Reducing federal aid created a sever problem for certain states; New York as effectively made bankrupt, and the number of Americans living in poverty rose from 29 million to 35 million.

  1. Examine the Causes and Consequences of the changing balance of power between the federal ...

    The fact that state governments are no longer relying so heavily on these grants is an important reason why the balance of power has shifted away from the federal government since 1980. It is therefore clear that by decreasing state dependence on the federal government during an era of relative

  2. Why did opposition to Apartheid Grow during the 1950s And 1960s in South Africa?

    Walter Sisulu became the Secretary-General on the ANC in 1949. a few weeks later Oliver Tambo and Nelson Mandela joined him aswell in the Executive Committee. The ANC then adopted the League's programme of Action. This meant strikes, demonstrations and boycotts.

  1. 'Examine the reasons for change in the balance of power between the federal and ...

    The States responded to the changing political environment by becoming 'more assertive, imaginative and innovative' they began to promote their own interests more forcefully. They acted as pressure groups within the broader political system through organisations such as National Governors' Association, US Conference of Mayors and the National League of Cities.

  2. Is the USA still a federal state?

    and the ?rise of socialism.? Despite both a Supreme Court backing and a legitimate winning in 2012 election Obama care has provoked widespread criticism that this health care reform is an arbitrary imposition on state governments to administrate due to the following reasons.

  1. Assess the view that the US Constitution often ensures limited government

    This check significantly limits the power of the president, as he cannot go to war, or sign treaties without permission from Congress first. Congress has the power to investigate both members of the executive branch, as well as members of the judiciary.

  2. Power in America. The idea that the rich run America has been encompassed in ...

    In his book Domhoff claimed: "There continues to be a small upper class that owns 20 to 25 percent of all privately held wealth and 45 to 50 percent of all privately held corporate stock, sits in seats of formal power from the corporate community to the federal government, and wins much more often that it loses on issues".

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work