• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

For conservatives what is the more important idea, the rejection of radical change or the need to preserve a hierarchical society?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐For conservatives what is the more important idea, the rejection of radical change or the need to preserve a hierarchical society? At the heart of conservative philosophy, two ideas stand out as central to its vision of the world. The first of these is the desire to preserve tradition, and the second, is the commitment to preserving a hierarchical society. Conservatives have often tried to persuade us that the tried and tested ways of doing things and the benefits of a disciplined society are in the interests of everybody. These principles have conceived many different forms of conservative politics, despite this, its highly arguable that these two concerns are really two sides of the same story, with the same ending, the justification of an unequal society. In this essay, I will seek to demonstrate that the conservative world that conservatives wish to preserve and defend, has been characterised by hierarchy. Their ongoing resistance to change has, in effect, been an attempt to preserve hierarchy in the face of democratic change. Conservatism means to be cautious, suspicious of change and to prefer to keep things as they are. An extreme conservative doesn?t change anything at all. First developed by Edmund Burke in his book ?Reflections on a Revolution in France? (1790) He believed that society evolves over time through gradually accumulating wisdoms of the past, and that it couldn?t be rushed through rapid or violent change, or that it could be improved through abstract ideas or blueprints. ...read more.


Those at the top however, have a duty to alleviate the suffering of those at the bottom. Libertarian conservatism combines the ideas of libertarian politics, with classic conservative values. The biggest example of libertarian conservatism is the ?New Right? in the UK and US in the 1980?s and 1990?s. It was actualised in Britain by the advent of Thatcherism. While the classic conservative values were still present, it was open to things like limited state intervention and radical changes. It also introduced ideas that were foreign to conservatives like a limited welfare provision and was actually seen as a return to a more classical liberal style of government, which was previously the complete opposite to conservative ideals. The first of the two ideas - the rejection of radical change, is spurned from the idea that the society we live in is the best we can hope for, it is the product of evolution, as we as humans have worked hard to reach the position that we are currently in. Like a good wine, our society has matured over time, so also like a good wine, why not preserve it? It?s important to learn from lessons passed down from generation to generation, and we owe it to our predecessors to learn from from the lessons of history, as it brings accumulate wisdom. ...read more.


another base in the belief of hierarchy, is that hierarchy is itself, the basis of order. One of the biggest fears that conservatives share is the fear of chaos, that things will fall out of control and descend into mayhem, which is why they believe a hierarchy is needed as it stops signs of chaos before they start, if all the right people are in the positions they should be. Ideas like liberal individualism and socialist egalitarianism both undermine the natural order, and present the risk of chaos to a conservative way of life. Violence and anarchy are the results of when institutions fail to tame our nature. Many opponents of conservatism say that this point of view harbours greed-mongering politicians. To conclude, while both ideas of conservatism have their differences, it is clear they have many more similarities, both of them point to the idea that the people on top deserve to be there, and those on the bottom deserve to as well. There is no room for those from the bottom to get to the top, and everything is done to prevent those from the top falling down to the bottom. This is all executed under the guise of ?tradition? and maintaining ?natural order? however it seems obvious that it is all designed with the idea of preserving hierarchy?s that are frankly archaic in todays world. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Why and to what extent have conservatives supported tradition?

    The New Right was, as its name suggests, a significant, distinct break with the conservative thinking that had gone before. It was a radical break with the post-war Keynesian 'social democratic' consensus on the economy, and this can be seen as challenging the old definition of Conservatism.

  2. Is the 'New Right' a departure from or a continuation of traditional British Conservatism?

    The former wish to maintain traditional Conservative values while also pursuing a New Right agenda. Arguably it is the latter, represented by MP's like Alan Duncan, which are the departure from traditional or any other form of Conservatism. Thatcher represented the dominant Traditionalist grouping which Alan Clarke has stated is really Gladstonian Liberalism.

  1. In defining whether Thatcherism was different from conservatism we must first understand which form ...

    These were all clearly liberalist in there approach. Thatcherism was charged with the fracturing of the post-war political consensus but this is not the whole picture. Both ideologies were, in part, catalyst for change. In fact even the Labour government of 1974-79 had an impact on the decline in consensus politics.

  2. Why and to what extent, have conservatives supported One Nation principles?

    Thus, One Nation conservatism may been favourable to some conservatives since a paternalistic body with links to the past can uphold the workings of the past which have responded well for several hundred years. The paternalistic bodies of authority in One Nation conservatives will uphold the famous conservative phrase that

  1. "At the heart of New Right thought, lies the paradox of libertarian and authoritarian ...

    This last point is not necessarily true of the New Right system as Margaret Thatcher was voted into power; however, she was in control mainly by herself, as she made little use of cabinet, as she loaded her front-benches with similar-thinking Thatcherites.

  2. Account for the rejection of the "democratic experiment" by the independent Southeast Asia states.

    The Philippine economy was in an economic rut and there was growing middle class discontent about political corruption and the inability of the political system to solve the country's social and economic problems. Hence when Marcos imposed marital law (promised stability and improvements in the country)

  1. The ability to manage conflict is undoubtedly one of the most important skills a ...

    Supervisors like this may be uncomfortable with using their power or afraid of losing the friendship or co-operation of their staff. The danger of this approach is that their staff often do not take them or their ideas seriously. But whenever an issue is less important than the relationship, accommodating

  2. Compare the views about the nature and development of Carl Rogers and George Kelly. ...

    Kelly initially began his career using Freudian therapy, but felt it worked only because his clients believed it should. It was at this time when Kelly made an observation that was to have a profound influence on his later theory.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work