• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Freedom of the Press, if it means anything at all, means the freedom to criticize and oppose." (Orwell)

Extracts from this document...


"Freedom of the Press, if it means anything at all, means the freedom to criticize and oppose." (Orwell) The impulse for journalists to expose the evils of society is often paralleled in novels. Through One Hundred Years of Solitude and One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich, Garcia Marquez and Solzhenitsyn become a part of this prevalent literary trend of social criticism. In both works, the society portrayed experiences a period of political turmoil. Garcia Marquez uses Colonel Aureliano Buendia to illustrate an effect of the Liberal revolution against the Conservative regime in Macondo, criticizing the personality defects suffered as a result of involvement in this situation of political instability. Solzhenitsyn's characters exist in mid-twentieth century Russia under Josef Stalin's totalitarianist regime in a Siberian labour camp. Ivan Denisovich experiences loss of individuality, changes in character and his time in the camp eliminates any prospect of an ordinary life after his release. Social criticism in literature looks at how a situation affects characters and how it changes them. While Colonel Aureliano Buendia's demise conveys the vices of revolution and war and Ivan Denisovich is used to address the effects of placement in a labour camp under a dictatorial rule, such as under Stalin, the novels do contain a common thread. Both Garcia Marquez and Solzhenitsyn criticize how politically unstable societies cause character transformation through the development of their respective characters, Colonel Aureliano Buendia and Ivan Denisovich. ...read more.


While certain aspects of character are maintained, such as how Ivan Denisovich retains a great deal of dignity while in the labour camp, other aspects of personality are altered. In One Hundred Years of Solitude the alterations to Colonel Aureliano Buendia's personality caused by participation in a politically rooted war are evident. For example, one of his colleagues, General Moncada, said to the Colonel, "'What worries me...is that out of so much hatred for the military...you've ended up as bad as they are.'" (174). The General noticed changes in Colonel Aureliano Buendia's behaviour. This being the reaction of a colleague; his mother's reaction to her transformed son is an even better indication of the extent to which he's changed: "Ursula had the gloomy feeling that her son was an intruder.'" (174). Neither change connotated by Garcia Marquez is constructive: a developing harshness and unfamiliarity as well as a loss of good nature are implied. In One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich a degradation of Ivan Denisovich's character is used to illustrate the effects of forcible placement in a labour camp. Solzhenitsyn uses loss of hope, an essential aspect of life, to critique the effects on Ivan of extended exposure to a politically inflicted situation. Ivan's inner discourse reveals the fact that he, a previously self sufficient, small town carpenter, no longer has hopes or aspirations. He feels that, "Writing home now is like throwing rocks into a bottomless pit." ...read more.


(48) Though Ivan's sentence will end and he will no longer be directly affected by Stalin through his imprisonment, his time there will continue to ruin his quality of life through preventing him from working or returning to his family. Solzhenitsyn's criticism shows contempt for the effects that Stalin's political reign had on Soviet lives. Both authors illustrate that the respective situations of their characters affect not only present life, but that of the future as well. This is the final element of the criticism on the adverse effects of political instability as demonstrated through Ivan Denisovich and Colonel Aureliano Buendia. In both One Hundred Years of Solitude and One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich pointed social criticisms illustrate how politics cause harm to an individual. Garcia Marquez and Solzhenitsyn develop their characters Colonel Aureliano Buendia and Ivan Denisovich according to this purpose. Both characters exist in turbulent political situations and become involved in them through circumstance. Colonel Aureliano Buendia becomes harsh and detached as a result while Ivan Denisovich loses personal hope. Both authors construct their respective characters according to a motive of demonstrating the alterations to personality invoked by political involvement. They also show that political instability affects a character's future as well as their present existence. By subjecting each character to a period of political turmoil Garcia Marquez and Solzhenitsyn are able to criticize the effect of this political instability on the characters, exposing the effects as evils of society. Word Count: 1472 2 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Examine the first five chapters of 1984 - Discuss how Orwell explores and introduces ...

    3 star(s)

    A method in which control and doublethink is channelled and enforced is inside every room and corridor are telescreens which are two way, sending and receiving. The giant telescreen in every citizen's room always is giving the citizens propaganda designed to make the Party appear to be a triumphant success.

  2. Utilitarianism: Explanation And Study of Criticisms

    Also, we do not know how long the result will last for. Hume argued for this statement: "The effects of an action form part of a chain that stretches into the indefinite future. Here is always the possibility that a very positive result of an action may subsequently lead to very negative consequences."

  1. 'Socialists have disagreed on both the means and ends of socialism' - Discuss

    They criticise liberal individualism for encouraging selfish, egoistical behaviour and attitudes. So although the 'third way' supports some aspects of liberal economics, they reject liberal social and moral ideas. Instead they advocate rights and responsibilities, autonomy and interdependence.

  2. Socialist uses of workers' inquiry

    What penalty can be inflicted on the worker if he is the cause of the breach? 50. If there are apprentices, what are their conditions of contract? 51. Is your work permanent or casual? 52. Does work in your trade take place only at particular seasons, or is the work usually distributed more or less equally throughout the year?

  1. Evolutionary and Revolutionary Socialists Disagree about both Means and Ends - Discuss.

    Secondly the reason why they were on the brink of revolution was that there was no other way of changing anything. The masses were unenfrachised so could have no vote to change anything, there weren't institutions that were listened to out of elections such as pressure groups for any one to join.

  2. Breaking down the Walls: A Discourse of Ideology and "Otherness"

    Like Wright, I, too, had similar situations. At the age of 6, is the year 1989, I witnessed a white man publicly berating a black teenage girl. The incident became widespread news in south central Alabama. Blacks were outraged, yet I did not and could not understand.

  1. Philosophy Essay - Is it possible to explain human morality by means of just ...

    He said that the seeking of pleasure at the expense of others is wicked, i.e. selfishness, the aim of achieving pleasure for everybody is the aim of morality. He used the fact that we dislike pain and enjoy pleasure to base his theory on.

  2. Russia's Political Party System as an Obstacle to Democratization

    Additionally, independents contested in every district, whereas parties contested in much fewer, ranging from the Communist Party contesting in 57 percent of the districts to the Movement in Support of the Army party contesting in 8 percent, with the average party contesting in only 32 percent.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work