• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Has the Prime Minister acted more as a president in recent years?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Has the Prime Minister acted more as a president in recent years? Presidentialism is the trend of political leaders acting increasingly like executive presidents through the rise of personalized leadership. The key difference between a president and a prime minister was succinctly summed up by Bagehot in 1963 when he described the role of e prime minister to be the 'first among equals'. This means that traditionally prime minister is the primary representative of government whilst sill ensuring that all members of the cabinet have an equal influence over decisions. In recent years it is clear that this is no longer the case. The Iraq war in 2003 demonstrated personal leadership replacing collective leaders and many believed that the decision to go to war was a clear reflection of the fact that the UK no longer had a prime minister, but a president. Tony Blair had ignored mass anti-war demonstrations on the streets on London and other major UK cities with his fierce determination to 'stand by the USA'. In an age of political celebrity, the public profile of the prime minister dominates those of senior colleagues and of their parties. ...read more.

Middle

or simply high-profile news stories such as when Gordon Brown recently discussed and in some ways was blamed for the 'Baby P' case instead of the minister of children, schools and families (Ed Balls) the same was seen when Tony Blair was the key figure instigating the war in Iraq as opposed to the foreign secretary. Thirdly, the personalised election campaigns demonstrate how it is the leader of the party that is fighting for the votes of the electorate as opposed to the MP's of the constituencies. The media increasingly portrays elections as battles between the prime minister and the leader of the opposition, this was illustrated by The Independent's headline 'Brown Vs Cameron: Let the battle commence' at the time of the party conferences. The Party leaders have become the 'brand image' of their parties or government, meaning that personality and image have become crucial determinants of political success. Finally, the decreasing importance of the cabinet demonstrates the prime ministers growing independence; this is made evident by the rising use of private advisors rather than cabinet ministers. ...read more.

Conclusion

Without these factors a prime minister will appear incredibly weak and therefore both unpowerful and unpresidential which would force a prime minister into a much more consensual style of leadership, this was seen by Gordon Brown throughout the summer of 2008 which then lead to a lot of further debates of his ability to lead and disputes within the party. Although this would be seem as if a prime minister has lost all presidential status, the fact that throughout 2008 Gordon Brown was blamed and publicised as opposed to the blame for the government blunders being shared amongst the party, Gordon Brown continued to demonstrate his spatial leadership, a key determinant that the prime minister leadership does lean towards the trend of presidentialism. It is clear that there is a growing trend towards a British presidency despite the fact that no British prime minister will ever be able to exercise the same powers as the American president but due to increasing tendency of the growth of spatial leadership, the tendency towards 'populist outreach' and the increase of personalised election campaigns, it is hard to ignore that the face of British politics are evolving. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Comparison of the US President and British Prime Minister.

    Undoubtedly, the prime minister appears to hold a considerable advantage in controlling his party, much more so than the president, who is faced with a disunited party system and the lack of a working authority with his party colleagues. The power, which each office holds over the passage of legislation,

  2. The comparison of the US President and the British Prime Minister appears from the ...

    policy appears to spark the interest of Parliament, shown by the quality of debates on foreign issues. The Prime Minister does not have the ability to use Executive powers in this area either, and he does not hold the position of Head of State.

  1. Taoiseach VS Primer Minister

    In the current Irish cabinet there are ten Fine Gael Ministers, Five Labour Ministers and one super Junior Minister (who cannot vote during cabinet meetings), therefore the Taoiseachs power of appointment is restricted even further as his coalition partners will also be able to make ministerial nominations e.g.

  2. Compare and contrast the position and powers of the US president and the UK ...

    But it is also very clear about the powers given to Congress and to the Supreme Court. In recent years, the Supreme Court has been more involved in assessing states rights rather than presidential powers and in the aftermath of September 11th 2001, G W Bush has seemingly been able to do anything by flying the patriot's flag.

  1. Arguments that the British Prime Minister is an elective dictator are arrant nonsense. The ...

    The defendants relied on a warrant from the Secretary of State ordering them to search for Entick. The court held that in absence of a statute or judicial precedent upholding the legality of such a warrant, the practice was illegal.

  2. To what extent does the prime minister dominate the UK political system?

    Thatcher paid the price for losing two opponents. One of them, Hesseltine, was dismissed in 1986 and waited for the moment to bring down Thatcher, succeeding in 1990. Only by including political opponents in the cabinet will this 'broad church' be satisfied.

  1. Has The Prime Minister Become More Powerful In Recent Years?

    He prefers to have bilateral meetings with individual ministers, where policy objectives are resolved. The office of the Prime Minister has been strengthened and more of the cabinet has fallen under the control of the Prime Minister. This shows increasing power for the Prime Minster.

  2. Which do you consider to be the more powerful chief executive in his or ...

    powers to the extreme. This viewpoint derives from the fact that Congress was about to impeach (remove from office) Nixon before he resigned. Again this illustrates the powerful nature of the legislature that even a strong, 'imperial' US president must face. Nevertheless, the UK Prime Minister is also subject to limitations.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work