• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Herzberg’s theory is better than Maslow’s theory as an explanation of what motivates workers.

Extracts from this document...


Motivation Hypothesis: A- Herzberg's theory is better than Maslow's theory as an explanation of what motivates workers. Abraham Maslow believed his hierarchy (see appendix 1) of needs explained people's behaviour and answered the question 'Why do people work?' So for employers to achieve greatest efficiency (see appendix 2) from their employees they need to make sure these needs are fulfilled. But in 1959 Fredrick Herzberg created a new theory (see appendix 3), which stated sources of job satisfaction and job dissatisfaction. These two theory's are important for employers because for them to achieve 100% efficiency and to achieve the highest productivity (see appendix 4), they need their employees to be motivated and satisfied within their workplace. Both these theory's tell the employer what they need to do and what to achieve in order to accomplish this equilibrium between them and their employees. To see whether I should accept of reject my hypothesis I must investigate further the two theory's and what motivates workers. To do this I constructed a questionnaire relating to both theory's (see appendix 5). ...read more.


These both tie in with Maslow's hierarchy and are also included within Herzberg's theory, as relationships with colleagues are included in the satisfaction side (only just though). Using the last graph I can tell that the work itself is a major form of satisfaction within the workplace - this does link with Herzberg's theory but the theory shows that the work is half satisfaction and half dissatisfaction. The least form of satisfaction is the advancement available - this does not link with Herzberg's theory as he has put advancement in the middle and above many of the other choices that could have been chosen. Using the first two pie charts I can tell that out of he people I asked, most of them were full time - this is important as if people are working full time they will have different motivations than those only working part time. For example; part timers (especially those I asked) were mostly students, of which only really work because they need the money, and they do not really tend to enjoy their work as much as maybe a full timer would. ...read more.


These reasons are also connected to level 3 of his hierarchy, which is relating to affiliation. Herzberg's theory; From my results I can see that maybe Herzberg's theory is not quite as appropriate as Maslow's hierarchy. I came to this conclusion because Herzberg said Achievement as the highest form of satisfaction and that the working conditions are the lowest form (out of the choices I gave). This does not link in with my results, as salary was the second highest and achievement was only the third highest. I did only really do one question within my questionnaire that linked in with Herzberg's theory so maybe if I did a couple more I may have got a better range of results. Also a lot of the people I asked were part timers of which would not really mind about the advancement or the achievement and would care more about the salary, and maybe the work or conditions. This may be why my results are quite varied compared to Herzberg's theory. ?? ?? ?? ?? Sarah Batchelder 12GS ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Utilitarianism: Explanation And Study of Criticisms

    Problem: It collapses the desirable into the desired. But the two at times don't coincide. For example: people often don't know what's good for them or are unable to choose it because of lack of information, irrationality, false consciousness, or weakness of the will.

  2. Socialist uses of workers' inquiry

    As we know, this thread dates back to some of Engels' writings. In an attempt to establish a generic materialism and a dialectics of universal value, Engels clearly created a system that was far from faithful to Marx's theory. The science of dialectics, applicable to natural and social sciences alike,

  1. A Study of Carl Rogers' Theory of Personality

    By using the term "gestalt", Rogers points to the possibility of change describing it as "a configuration in which the alteration of one minor aspect could possibly alter the whole picture" (Rogers p.201).

  2. Russia's Political Party System as an Obstacle to Democratization

    (Gvosdev 2002, 488). This is a most disturbing trend, since it threatens to make parties representative of, and accountable to, the very elites who are themselves supposed to be held accountable. This would sever the connections between Russia's society and its political system, which is essential to a democratic political

  1. Marxism - political theory

    Because of this complex set of relations, which often fold back in on themselves, the future is both indeterminate and contingent on individual action. Indeed, this relationship between actors and structures is at the heart of Marx's theory. Structures both constrain and enable individuals, having the potential of both helping them to fulfill themselves and contributing to their exploitation.

  2. Is political theory useful?

    All of the ideas in the philosophers' works, except for Marx, were interpretations of what they have seen, and the way they explain it. Locke hasn't invented democracy, Hobbes autocratic rule, or Rousseau the representative government, but all of them have contributed to improvement, better understanding and justification of their beliefs.

  1. M-theory is a solution proposed for the unknown theory of everything

    Strominger and Vafa proved for large values of the charges the entropy S = logN, where N is equal to the number of quantum states that system can be in, agrees with the Bekenstein-Hawking prediction (1/4 the area of the event horizon).

  2. Douglas McGregor's Theory X and Theory Y(1906-1964)

    Theory X and Theory Y In 1960's, Douglas McGregor wrote a book called, The Human Side of Enterprise. In his book, McGregor explained that he researched on individual's behaviour at work, and he developed two theories: Theory X and Theory Y.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work