• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"How accurate is Source A when applied to the activities of the Palestine Liberation Organisation under Yasser Arafat since the 1960s ?"

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

SOME HINTS TO ANSWERING COURSEWORK TWO PART TWO "Use of Sources about the use of "Terrorism" in the Middle East situation" Official Question: "How accurate is Source A when applied to the activities of the Palestine Liberation Organisation under Yasser Arafat since the 1960s ?" Remember: you can use the Sources but must NOT cop out my suggestions. You CAN use this set of notes to form an outline of your answer. Yoru answer does NOT have to be very long as you are only asked to COMMENT on four small Pieces of Evidence. You must end up with a Conclusion in which YOU say whether what Source A says is "Accurate" or "Inaccurate", so you need to start of your answer by saying what "Accurate" means to an historian THIS COURSEWORK IS EASIER THAN IT LOOKS AT FIRST!! Source A: Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun [By Mao-Tse-Tung, Communist leader in the Civil War in China in the 1930s. He wrote this line in a book in 1938. In 1948 he took over all of China and became its leader. He was never elected] Source B: Since the 1980s, Yasser Araft has tried hard to change his image from that of "freedom fighter" to the idea of a sensible, moderate statesman. ...read more.

Middle

Under its leader Yasser Arafat the PLO avoided fighting the Israelis face-to-face [there have been 4 Arab-Israeli wars, and the Israelis won all 4] and began to use what they called "guerrilla" or "freedom" fighting ideas [such as ambushes, bombings, assassinations etc] but which the Israelis and their powerful American allies still call "terrorism" [Remember George Bush calls the fighting in Iraq part of his struggle against "the world of terrorism". The PLO claimed it was only using the same methods the Jews had used against the Romans 2000 years ago and also against the British army between 1945-1948, when some Jews killed British soldiers to try to get the British government to give the Jewish people their own homeland. So, said the Palestinians, if it was alright for you to use nasty ways of fighting to gain your freedom, then we can use the same ways ourselves. The problem is the use of the word "terrorism", which is a word always used by one side to claim the other side is not fighting "decently" and "fairly". A MODEL ANSWER [Do NOT copy this] Official Question: "How accurate is Source A when applied to the activities of the Palestine Liberation Organisation under Yasser Arafat since the 1960s ?" ...read more.

Conclusion

So the PLO switched to blowing up targets outside Israel, in countries friendly to Israel: this was to get the world to at least notice there was a problem [see Source C]. Then, having got the rest of the world [especially the USA] to take some interest, Arafat switched his plans and starting talking to the Israelis, just as if he had always been a normal leader. The Israelis wanted peace [they said] so a peace deal was signed [see Source B]. But some PLO members said that Arafat had sold them out by talking to the enemy Israel, and they continued with their ideas of "terrorism", even attacking their old friends in the PLO and, as we know now, committing acts of "terrorism" in other countries [see Source D]. Remember the connection between the Palestinian people's problems and the attacks in New York and Washington DC on 11/9/2001 by Al-Qaeda and Osama bin Laden. So Source A was accurate once: "terrorism" used to work. But eventually both sides agree that it is better to sit down and talk, with both sides making a deal. [This is what is happening in Northern Ireland, where the IRA and the British are working with each other, while 20 years ago they were killing each other]. The problem in the Middle east is to convince people who have hated each other on-and-off for thousands of years that they can sit down, talk, and possibly even live side-by-side. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Middle east section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Middle east essays

  1. Terrorism. What is terrorism? 2. Why do terrorists ...

    An example is Al-Jihad which uses car bombs and selective assassinations to attack selective officials. Doing this can make the group look more powerful and so making people scared of the group and give in to their demands. Indiscriminate bombing has been used with the aim of undermining the will and morale of a community.

  2. Beliefs - "One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter."

    One example is the recent war in Iraq. Soldiers killed thousands of innocent people, and captured many others, in a hope to achieve what? Freedom? Terror? One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. In addition there are many terrorists in the United States itself, though this fact seems to be ignored when George W Bush is preaching

  1. Can terrorism ever be a legitimate and effective means of pursuing political goals?

    Al-Qaeda started as a recruiting office in Afghanistan designed to recruit young Muslims to fight against the invading Soviet forces. Created in 1979 they soon recruited a young but very wealthy fanatic called Osama Bin Laden. Convinced of the their cause Bin Laden began to finance the expansion of the Al-Qaeda group.

  2. Can Terrorism Be Stopped?

    by a set of terrorist's attacks that caused a lot of damage and killed many people. Crisis management played a key role after September 11th attack. They had to build up their confidence, secure the financial system and avoid emotions or depression.

  1. Free essay

    why some palestinians dont agree with terrorism

    This organisation resists fanatics and thinks peace must be made through negotiation only. Another organisation which was set up by a Journalist in Chicago is Ray Hanania who organises Palestinian and Jewish comedians to put together a show about the Arab Israeli.

  2. Are suicide bombers psychological disturbed or brainwashed by external forces After the attacks on ...

    This further cements the planning of the attacks and shows it was not Tanweer's pure thoughts that fuelled him to spontaneously commit his own life on board the train. The failed attacks of 21st of July in London also show to use that there is a complex web of sources for the terrorist cells.

  1. History Coursework: The Arab-Israeli Conflict

    After the 1948-1949 fighting the United Nations formed the UN Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA). They set up the refugee camps and provided food and the bare necessities needed. They also provided basic medical and education systems. The conditions in these camps were awful.

  2. Armed Islamic Group [ Gia ]

    Beyond that, however, the GIA has not articulated precise political goals, and GIA cells are said to operate independently. Most recent GIA attacks are thought to be either acts of retribution, assaults on wayward members, or simple banditryThe GIA's philosophy was as simple as it was self-defeating..The partisans of the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work