• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How democratic was Britain by 1918?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How democratic was Britain by 1918? In early 19th century Britain was an undemocratic country. Boroughs and counties divided the electoral system. There were voting differences between them. Men had to be of a particular age and a particular wealth to earn the franchise. Seats were not distributed equally - not by population. Bribery and corruption was apparent throughout the country. Only the rich could stand for election because it was an unpaid job with an entrance fee. There were no frequent elections. However between mid 19th century and 1918 there was vast progress. Greater equality and less power based on wealth helped this. Economic, social and political changes assisted the country into becoming democratic. The reform act of 1867 extended the franchise and introduced a fairer distribution of mps. In boroughs all male household owners satisfying a one year residence could vote. In counties all male household owners owning property to the value of �5 could vote. In boroughs all male lodgers living in rooms worth at least �10 could vote. In counties all men renting property with an annual value of �12 could vote. These acts increased the number of voters to 2,445,847 in 1869. 1 in 3 males had the vote. Even though the number of voters had dramatically increased the franchise was still dominated by wealth. ...read more.

Middle

The party was now assessable and accountable. He also established the national union of conservative associations. In 1874 there were 400. Democracy was increasingly important to a vast amount of people. As the world went forward with changes so did democracy. Houses were cleaner, hospitals were more efficient and successful. People were living longer. The railways had opened up Britain and with it brought holidays for all, better food and healthier living. By 1868 there were 16 towns with newspapers. News spread quickly and by 1901 there were 71 towns with papers. The world was attempting to become fair an equal to all. However the houses of lords increased its numbers. This is unfair because its not democratic, the people do not decide on who achieves a seat in the house of lords, members of the house of lords are honoured with their title or they inherit the title. The explanation for this increase was: a protection against the tyranny of the commons majority. But the house of commons was voted in by the people, the House of Lords thought democracy was a tyranny There was a local government act in 1894, this was the establishment of local councils, this was the government developing a system, a structure that was an important part of democracy. ...read more.

Conclusion

Returning officers expenses and election costs were to be met by public funds and not by candidates. This establishment of the electoral system made things faire. It set a more organised system. One undemocratic law not ruled out was the number of votes a certain person could have. Business owners and university graduates could have two votes. Between 1922 and 1945 the conservatives owed about nine seats to university graduates and about 7-11 seats to business owners. Constituencies were reorganised so that each was as near 70,000 votes reasonably possible. Apart from 10 double membered borough seats, old borough county division disappeared. This was very democratic apart from the ten double member borough seats. Having an equal system all around Britain, this was the setting and establishing of a system which would be the basis of any future decisions over constituencies. By 1918 the country was reasonably democratic. There were many factors holding Britain back at this time from being democratic. The vote was one of these, even though it had improved dramatically. The vote still needed the equality of suffrage and an age decrease to 18. Still some people could have two votes, this was deffanatly undemocratic. The last undemocratic factor was the ten double membered seats. However changes were taking place and soon the country would be able to call it democratic. Jennifer Dickson ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. How democratic was Britain by 1918

    Now large working class cities had at least some form of representation. A Corrupt and Illegal practices Act was also passed so that people could vote for who they liked and so the government would be by the people. However, this could not be because working class people could still

  2. Nigeria Country Study

    economic and social activities could thrive for the benefit of the people. In other words, this means that the peace and security needed for economic growth in the continent could only be achieved if the political platform is stable. * The Role of Political Parties - Tribal, religious, and regional

  1. Accounts for the changes in voting behaviour in the last 30 years in UK ...

    Given certain conditions, issues can help to swing voters. In the 1964 and 1970 elections, immigration was a significant issue, particularly in the West Midlands, while industrial relations and the cost of living were important factors in February 1974. Issues played a large part in deciding the 1979 election.

  2. How and why does Locke explain the creation, value and protection of property?

    Man had a natural right to that with which he mixed his labour. The fundamental idea behind this theory on private property was that by expending ones internal energy (owns labour power) upon something, that item became a part of oneself, or one's private property.

  1. Socialist uses of workers' inquiry

    Do you know of any cases when the workers have benefitted from the so-called pensions schemes, which are controlled by the employers, but the initial capital of which is deducted beforehand from the workers' wages? 97. Are there cooperative guilds in your trade?

  2. Russia's Political Party System as an Obstacle to Democratization

    Obviously, there is a great gulf between the Communist Party (which best exemplifies McFaul's depiction) and the other three long-standing parties, into which new parties can successfully insinuate themselves.4 Even more may be learned through a closer examination of the Unity and the Fatherland-All Russia parties.

  1. The Parliamentary Reform and Redistribution Act of 1884 - 1885.

    to tell from the sources that the Reform Act and the Redistribution Act aided the Working Class in the right to vote thus increasing the ability to show their views in Parliament, this meant that a party was needed to work with them and express their views in Parliament, thus

  2. Iran Country Study

    Iran's economy experienced a major decline in the agricultural sector but the success of its industrialization remained limited. Forced industrialization of a fairly limited scale came with a great deal of political repression that many Iranians, including women, grew increasingly intolerant of.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work