• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How democratic was Britain by 1918

Extracts from this document...


How democratic was Britain by 1918? Kirsty Adams A country is democratic only when all of their citizens have access to the political process and their voting system is fair. Also, it is democratic when the government is accountable to the voters and voters have the right of choice in elections. Democracy is a government of the people, by the people, for the people. This included: fairness, accountability, choice, access to information, party organisation, the right to vote and the opportunity to become an MP. The political system round about the 1850's was full of corruption and unfairness. Elections were ran by bribery because MP's used to pay voters off and because voting was just a matter of raising your hand candidates would be able to see who voted for them or not. The political system favoured the wealthy in many ways: there was a requirement that no man could stand for election unless he owned land worth �610. ...read more.


This meant well over 100 new voters. This act also contributed to the major redistribution of seats. 35 boroughs lost both their MP's and 17 lost 1 MP. Many boroughs then merged together into counties and Scotland gained 7 MP's. Many new counties and cities gained an MP. The 1884 Reform Act gave working class people in the countryside the vote (this was very ineffective because of industrialisation and most people were moving towards the town) but still not all men had the vote and no women had the right to vote yet. But by 1918 women over 30 and men over 21 had the right to vote. Access to information plays a demanding role in how democratic Britain was becoming. One of the reasons that working class people could not get a say in the running of the country was down to literacy. As time progressed people were more able to understand what was going on through the growth of newspapers and libraries. ...read more.


In conclusion, although the political system was fairer due to the ballot act and the redistribution of seats act still people did not have the vote, especially women under 30. Also there were still very few working class candidates. The House of Commons was becoming more powerful than the Lords which meant a peoples government. People now had choice on who to vote for as corruption was diminished. Also, as access to information was more available it was easier to see which party they wanted to vote for. In general party organisation was improved through things like branch associations etc. The chance to become an Mp was much easier for other classes. Britain was on its way to becoming democratic although more would have had to be done to ensure fairness and choice so the public would have a government of the people, by the people, for the people. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Stages to Germany from 1918 to 1919

    On 31 October the worst of troubles yet to come began. There was a lot of trouble at the naval bases of Kiel and Wilhelmshaven when sailors refused to obey an order to sail out to salvage German honour in a final battle.

  2. T difficult for export orientated economics to sustain the land owning elites much longer. ...

    and the idea of liberal democracy being a successful political system was being rapidly eroded, the export orientated economics used by both countries could not respond effectively to the economic crisis which had left them vulnerable to external factors. Argentina and Brazil abandoned their Laissez-faire philosophy that had dominated politics

  1. Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons

    At the very least, increased transparency and the broadening of the competitive sphere clearly require that political managers develop a set of skills that permit them to meet such challenges and function well within these constraints. New Signals from the Private Sector Something similar to this attitude about encouraging conflict may be developing in the private sector.

  2. How Democratic is Britain?

    who are elected. The British system has a number of fixed posts, these posts holders are the civil servants, the lords and the judges. These are the three main institutions of the state and the most powerful groups in society. The role of the state is to act as an umpire or referee rather than side with one party over another.

  1. Is consociational democracy democratic?

    The Belgian governmental arena has overall remained fairly closed to non-pillar parties, which seems to contradict the very essence of grand coalition government16. In Switzerland, even though the major parties are represented on roughly proportional grounds in the Federal Council, the representatives are not always those nominated by the party17.

  2. Iran Country Study

    is in a different position today than it has been in the last 8 years. With the inauguration of Barack Obama, who promised open talks with Iranian President Ahmadinejad during the campaign, can the world expect new Tehran-Washington relations? In a sense, people should expect new relations, not just because

  1. Russia's Political Party System as an Obstacle to Democratization

    Although Fatherland-All Russia suffered from contradictory positions expressed by its leading adherents, Unity purposely kept its program vague as part of a strategy aimed at attracting non-partisan voters (Colton and McFaul 2000, 209) by appearing to be a non-ideological group and, thus, a refreshing departure from the usual party.

  2. The Parliamentary Reform and Redistribution Act of 1884 - 1885.

    Act with the Redistribution Act of 1885 as they promised to the House of Lords. The Act included many proposals which increased the male voting margin by 25.5% below are those proposals Seventy-nine towns with populations smaller than 15,000 lost their right to elect an MP Thirty-six with populations between

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work