• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How did the village of Dier Yassin come to be fought over in 1948, and why do sources A and B differ on who was to blame for the Arab flight from the village and other pars of Palestine at the time?

Extracts from this document...


How did the village of Dier Yassin come to be fought over in 1948, and why do sources A and B differ on who was to blame for the Arab flight from the village and other pars of Palestine at the time? Dier Yassin is a village inside the British mandate of Palestine. In 1948, at the time of the Israeli war of independence, from the 9-11 of April Dier Yassin was attacked. Over 100 Arabs were killed on the Haganna and Stern Gang war path between Jaffa and Jerusalem. This was a turning point in the Arab Israeli conflict and some claim that it started the Palestinian refugee crisis. This attack, however, was a small part of a bigger conflict in which the Arab contingent started war on the newly created Israel. The conflictarose from decades of old competing nationalists and as a result of this the Israelis launched operation Dalet on the 4th of April. Using Haganna and other militant groups their aim was to clear a road from Jaffa to Jerusalem and to split the Arab state into two and capture Jerusalem before the UN partition came into effect. This action was a result of a UN proposal formed after the refugee crisis as a result of World War One. The UNSCOP partition split the country in to two states: Israel and Palestine and put Jerusalem under UN control. This created tension on both sides. Firstly the Arabs had less land even though they had two thirds more people. ...read more.


The speaker, Mrs Golda Meir [Israel's foreign minister] is trying to shift the blame to the Arabs. The source says that the Jews were not responsible: The "responsibility", the speaker claims, "must lie" with the Arab leaders who told their people to leave so they could attack. She also says that the refugee crisis is not the result of an isolated case as refugees are a normal consequence of war. She firmly puts the blame on the Arab armies who she claims "invaded" the state of Israel. She is careful to talk about "hundreds of thousands of Palestinian Arabs" who were the victims of these invasions. Obviously she does not accept that Israel did anything illegal to cause the refugee problem. In her statement she makes it clear that she does not accept that the attack was a terror attack sanctioned by the Israeli leaders, as stated in Source A. The attack, she claims, was not part of an Israeli plan to force people out of the home but was a random attack by non-authorized militant "Jewish dissidents". The language the speaker uses is superficially less decorative and emotional. Infact she seems to be trying to create the impression that she is unbiased, using phrases like "historically incorrect" and attempts to reduce the horror of the event by words such as "incident". Any emotional language is saved to describe the Arab armies who carried out "aggression against Israel. This author might be trying to shift the blame for the refugee problem because who ever caused the problem would have to fix it by looking after the refugees, feed, cloth and house them, which would stretch already stretched resources. ...read more.


They claim that the attack was organised by Jewish dissidents and was not sanctioned by the Israeli government in any way shape or form. Again they try to shift the blame by claiming the Arabs started the war and refugee crisis. They claim that the Arabs started a civil war that initiated the refugee crisis. Then increasing it by telling the Arabs to leave so they could attack Jewish settlements. This lead to a major refugee crisis and one of the main reasons for the conflict in the Middle East. Another point the made is that refugees are a normal consequence of war and this is not a special case Both sources are partisan sources. They are one sided and are both trying to create opinion. The fact is they are both different interpretations from different sides about the same event and have to be corroborated to be useful. However we can extract facts from the heavily decorated and partisan wording to cross reference with other sources. Both also have issues of reliability. Source A: Partisan language leads to heavily loaded source, its wrote by Arabs and clearly is trying to create opinion, its part of a propaganda leaflet, its secondary so has had more time for a myth to be created and its designed to shift blame to the Israelis. Source B: Is also secondary and is a speech designed to shift blame to the Arabs for the refugee crisis. Moreover we need to corroborate these sources to find an accurate picture of what happened. We can't judge such a big thing with to Partisan sources. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Middle east section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Middle east essays

  1. Beliefs - "One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter."

    This important factor is outlined in the controversial Number 1 pop song entitled "Where Is The Love," sung by the American group "The Black Eyed Peas" It contains the lyrics: "Overseas we try to stop terrorism, But we still got terrorists here living in the USA, The big CIA."

  2. Explain why the UNO decided to partition Palestine in 1948?

    The Arabs' argument was that they had been living in Palestine much longer than the Jews, and that land had been passed down from generations of Arabs. Therefore they thought it was unfair that they should give their land over to the Jews.

  1. Terrorism. What is terrorism? 2. Why do terrorists ...

    Many Arabs see this as American money used to kill Muslims in return for oil. One key factor to this was the creation of Israel. It was created by giving Palestinian land to the Jews. When the Jewish state was created in 1948, five Arab nations had already created a coalition which was determined to destroy the new state.

  2. British policy towards Palestine in the creation of Israel, one must carefully analyze British ...

    This was a major geographical changing event that would support, the establishment of a Jewish state. British Mandate administration, in the eyes of the Zionist movement was quite successful. Factors that led to this success included, in-migration and demographic transformation, geographical transformations (the establishment of Transjordan), land acquisition, separate social and political institutions and creating Jewish Labor.

  1. Why is there still so much fear, suspicion and hatred between the Israelis and ...

    The Arab states also used the 'oil weapon' where they refused to export oil to the Western countries, thus gaining international 'sympathy' because the Western countries needed the oil. Israel didn't like this, as it meant that they wouldn't have the full support of countries such as USA.

  2. History-Arab/Israeli conflict section B

    to power in Germany and almost at once began persecution of the 6000,000 or so German Jews. They were excluded from the civil service, the law and journalism in October 1933; anti-Semitic teaching was introduced into German schools the same year, and soon Jewish shops were boycotted."

  1. Arab and Israeli conflict - source related study.

    When he phrases "in reality no such country exited" this shows that the Palestinians were fighting a war for no purpose. Source F is written from a history book and says that the PLO was not prepared and impatient. He also mentions that "These Palestinians achieved very little" showing that

  2. Assess the effectiveness of the Arab and Israeli peace initiatives from the 1970s to ...

    Egypt and a joint Jordanian-Palestinian delegation, as well as observers from other nations and organizations. Israel and the United States refused to allow a separate Palestinian delegation to attend the conference, nor would they allow the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work