• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How effective is Parliament in controlling the Executive?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐How effective is parliament in controlling the executive? In no sense in the UK does parliament control the executive, since we normally have single party government in the House of Commons, which with the use of the party whipping system can normally ensure the passage of government legislation, simply because the government has a majority of seats. The House of Lords by convention normally does not reject government bills that were announced in their election manifesto; in any event its delaying powers are restricted to one year, after which time bills automatically become law, regardless of Lords objections. Parliament does, however, have important scrutiny functions. In other words, the executive has to explain and justify their policies and actions to parliament. Ministers answer questions by backbenchers during the daily Question time, while the prime minister answers questions every Wednesday. It is often suggested that the media provide a more effective form of scrutiny than does parliament. MPs take up issues raised by their constituents, such as immigration rules. ...read more.


Each committee mirrors the party balance in the House, and so the majority of members are currently conservative MPs. Nevertheless the committees have often produced damning reports in recent years, particularly in the areas of health, social security, transport and industrial policy. The UK parliament is not a policy-making assembly, because the House of Commons is dominated by the governing party, which almost always has a majority of seats except for in coalitions, like there is now. The key function of making law has effectively been transferred to the executive branch, and therefore sees the Commons contribution to the process as one of ?scrutiny and influence?. The powers of the Lords are limited by law and by convention. They can delay legislation only for a year (under the 1949 Parliament Act). The Lords has a key role in the revision of Commons legislation, devoting about 700 hours each year to the task, and offering some 8500 amendments. ...read more.


At the same time there has been a massive growth in the role of government, and an accompanying increase in the size of the bureaucracies which advise governments and which administer policy. Yet over the last 25 years parliament has become more professional, with the disappearance of the ?part-time? MP, the introduction and strengthening of specialist committees, and the increase in support staff. The Commons is more critical of governments, backbenchers rebel more often and the Lords is far more willing to reject Commons legislation. MPs nowadays at the very least expect the Government to listen to them. Backbenchers (through public statements and negotiation behind the scenes) can sometimes force governments to make significant amendments to legislation, though it remains the case that they are usually unable to thwart any major government legislation. Similarly, the Lords can be rebellious, amending or delaying bills, but almost without exception ultimately defers to the Commons, normally after securing concessions. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Electing MPs to the House of Commons.

    In 2005, only 34% of British MPs were elected by more then 50% of the votes in their constituencies. This is a decline from 2001, when half of MPs could claim 50% support of their constituents. * It removes the need for negative voting.

  2. How effective is Parliament in checking Executive Power?

    This is fairer, as it allows all opinions and voices to be heard, rather than only the opposition voice which will always be critical of the Government and who's scrutiny may only be destructive. The House of Lords may make amendments to a bill up to three times, after which the Lower House may pass the bill anyway.

  1. Government & Politics Revision Notes

    In the 1990's, following the Dunblane killings, the snowdrop campaign prompted the government to take actions against gun control. Democratic processes operating through elections & political parties are supplemented by the existence of pressure groups, which broaden political participation & provide the public with an additional channel of communication with government, particularly in relation to particular issues.

  2. Ministers & Departments - Revision

    and are expected to remain politically neutral o Civil servants are permanent and can expect to retain their position or even rise up the ranks for promotion o Civil servants must have no political agenda no matter what their private views may be and should remain free from political bias

  1. How effective is Parliament as a check on the executive?

    The role of the whips also keeps MP's in line, they are tasked to maintain party discipline and demand loyalty. Each party has a chief whip, with more whips working under him/her. These whips are MP's and are paid for their trouble.

  2. Politics task

    If the majority votes for it, does the government go ahead with it? What about the wishes of the minority?

  1. How effective is the House of Commons as a check on the executive?

    One of the devices designed to check on the executive is Prime Ministers questions. The leader of the opposition, currently Michael Howard, is allowed to ask six questions of the Prime Minister and Charles Kennedy, leader of the third party, is entitled to ask three.

  2. How effective is Parliament in controlling the executive?

    At this event questions are raised and directed to the prime minister about his actions and dealing with the executive at their private meetings. He then has to explain himself, and how he thinks that his actions will benefit the country.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work