• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How Far Can the Weimar Constitution be Described as Creating an "Effective" Democracy

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How Stable Were the Politics of Weimar Germany 1924 - 1929? The problems of 1919-1923 had gone with the aid of American loans. Weimar quickly found its economic feet for the first time in its history. In 1928 Germany had returned to pre-1914 industrial figures. An expanding job market, confidence restored in foreign investors and house & factory building were all indications of Germany getting its old strength back, and generally becoming more stable. Minority political parties were quiet during this time. People were content with the way Germany was being run, so why turn to extremist parties? In fact the "Golden Age," of Weimar seemed to indicate that extremist parties only flourish in extreme circumstances. With similarities to the apparent stability of the Weimar economy at this time, the political situation seemed stable enough, but deeper probing can deeply show the illusory factors of this argument. Weimar politics at this time can be shown to support the argument for stability. From 1924, there were no long any attempts at a coup to overthrow the Republic like the Kapp Putsch (1920,) the Munich Putsch (1923,) and the Spartacist uprising (1919.) The electoral parties on the left and right, that were hostile to the Republic, seemed to be in political decline, as shown by comparing the Reichstag election results of May 1924, to May 1928, when the right wing DNVP declined from 95 to 73 seats, the Nazi party declined from 32 to 12 seats, and the communist KPD declined from 62 seats to 54. ...read more.

Middle

Thus the only real alternatives were a coalition from the moderate left to the moderate right consisting of SPD, DDP, Centre & DVP; or a coalition comprising the centre to the right, being the same as the previous coalition with the moderate left SPD replaced with the right wing DNVP. The moderate coalition worked together with foreign policy issues, tending to agree on a general direction going along with Stresemann's policy of d�tente. However they were divided over internal issues. The right-wing/centre coalition worked together terribly with regard to foreign policies, since the DNVP were in essence completely against d�tente in Europe, meaning that individual treaties had to be passed through with a Reichstag majority, as the majority coalition were completely disunited in this regard. Ironically this went against the DNVP's nature of authoritarianism, and so any foreign policy passed through with a majority from the Reichstag would have been very controversial; not the key to stable politics. Detlev Peukert, the left wing German historian, puts it in terms of there being "something unnatural about these political permutations, since deep regional & ideological tensions, ahd to be glossed over for the sake of making the parliamentary arithmetic come out right." There was no meeting of minds on political goals just, no enagement in debate between the left and right, just two brick walls pushing against each other, trying to achieve individual goals. ...read more.

Conclusion

At the end of the day, although things seemed stable on the surface, during this period the scene was being set for the political horrors of the 30's the domino effect had been started. Indication of this is the fact that over this period no chancellor could hold a government for over two years. Marx and Luther seemed to be continually interchanging as chancellor, heavilly indicating a sort of general political stalemate, with each one trying, failing, and then being replaced with the next. No party had a clear majority like the SPD, the biggest party by far, had anything near a majority, making a coalition the only option, so in this unstable period, for years there was a coalition which the biggest party was not actually in power. There were no charismatic characters, or democratic periods, like Hitler for the Nazis, to encourage an increase in democratic activity, and political debate was non-existant. Politics was incredibly unstable, which only really had significant implications that effected the people in a major way, when the (lack of) political stability caused Hitlers rise to and consolidation of power in 1933. In conclusion whilst it seemed stable, like the economy, Weimar politics was being set up for the horrors of the 30's. ?? ?? ?? ?? How Stable Were the Politics of Weimar Germany 1924 - 1929? Clive Freedman Page 4 of 4 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. "The US Constitution is entrenched and rigid; the UK has no Constitution worthy of ...

    Few attempted amendments have made it through the process successfully. One that did make it through was the 1971 amendment that allowed the voting age to be lowered to 18. In the UK however, Constitutional amendments are passed in the same way as any other proposed piece of legislation.

  2. Stages to Germany from 1918 to 1919

    Only a few days after this pact was made, on 15 November, The leader of the trade unions, Karl Legien and the leader of the industrial employers, Hugo Stinnes had a heavy conversation such as the two before and also came up with a pact, their agreement was, in effect,

  1. Indonesia: Transition and Prospects for Democracy

    However, it stopped being the majority party after the 1999 elections and has not gained support beyond 21.6% (Liddle & Mujani, 2005). "What is worrying though, (are) the attempts by Indonesia's more dominant political parties...- Golkar and ...PDI-P - to disqualify smaller parties from contesting the polls" (The Straits Times, October 22 2007).

  2. How Far Can the Weimar Constitution be Described as Creating an "Effective" Democracy

    So even extremists could be represented, and thus extremists are given a say in the running of the country albeit limited to the size of the extremists. Democracy is rule by the people, which the Weimar Constitution included extremists within.

  1. Marxism Can Only Be Appreciated Retrospectively

    at least confusing them to give rise to replacing it with something better. For example, capitalists make the consumers believe they are prime, they determine what gets produced through the choices they make (which mainly are encouraged through what they are taught at the institutions which are controlled through the capitalists).

  2. Can a plausible case be made for participatory democracy under modern conditions?

    in Israel 95% of the population do not live in such a society and, if a fully participatory society requires societies such as these voluntary communes in order adequately to function, then we have to ask whether such a system could ever really work in practice for entire societies in the modern world.

  1. Russia's Political Party System as an Obstacle to Democratization

    What is important to note here is Yeltsin's attempt to institute a two-party system from above. In 1995, at his instigation, two party blocs were formed-the right-of-center Our Home Is Russia (NDR) party bloc, formed by Prime Minister Chernomyrdin, and the left-of-center The Bloc of Ivan Rybkin party bloc, formed

  2. Participation is the essence of democracy Discuss

    In liberal democracies they extend the right to vote amongst citizens. This also means that the freedom of free speech is granted. Many Liberal democracies are incorporated with other democracies such as the UK is seen to be as a liberal democracy and a representative democracy.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work