How Far Could it be Argued that Parliament Has Lost Sovereignty?

Authors Avatar

Ross Holden

How Far Could it be Argued that Parliament Has Lost Sovereignty?

In the 1880’s a man named Dicey said that sovereignty lies with Parliament. However, various people argued with his theory by saying if people voted for Parliament then sovereignty must lie with the people. Dicey countered this by stating that there were two types of sovereignty, legal and political. He said that legal sovereignty lay with Parliament as they make the laws while political sovereignty lay with the people on election day.  However Norton argued in the 1900’s that ‘If one accepts that sovereignty is indivisible, how can one have two distinct bodies (the electorate and Parliament) each exercising sovereignty?’ Also, Government ministers are legally responsible to the monarch and they are strictly ‘Ministers of the Crown’ but by convention, they are responsible to parliament because as Dicey said, sovereignty lies with parliament. In 1885, Dicey stated that in his opinion the sovereignty of Parliament along with the rule of law were the two principle factors that supported the British constitution. Sovereignty is usually defined as the location of the highest authority in a state, so this would be the reason why Dicey saw the sovereignty of parliament as legal sovereignty.

Join now!

Since Dicey’s day, there have been many changes which may have allowed parliament to lose its sovereignty. For instance, in the 1800’s there were far fewer voters with only a small percentage of men voting and no women. Currently, there is a mass electorate with almost anyone over the age of eighteen being allowed the vote. With more people getting the vote, the people must have sovereignty, as there are more people to choose parliament. The British Empire used to be extremely large and strong however since the 1800’s the United Kingdom has gradually lost its power due to Parliament ...

This is a preview of the whole essay