• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do the policies of the PLO between the founding movement in 1964, and the signing of the Israeli PLO Accord in 1993?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far do the policies of the PLO between the founding movement in 1964, and the signing of the Israeli PLO Accord in 1993? The PLO was committed to the use of armed force and the complete destruction of Israel. However by the late 1980's Arafat had moved away from the use of violence and excepted the existence of Israel. There are three areas in which the PLO policies changed terror, the UNO and the state of Israel. First the National Charter, 1964 'Armed struggle is the only way to liberate Palestine'. This suggests that the Palestinians only believe in the use of terror in order to succeed in destroying Israeli power. Violence continued at the Olympic Games in 1972, a PLO group called Black September was responsible for the deaths of 11 Israeli athletes. Hijacking of planes in 1976 saw a splinter group taking over a French plane, holding over 100 Jewish passengers as hostages. ...read more.

Middle

However in 1974 Arafat addressed the UNO which contradicts their total rejection and shows how times are changing throughout the years. 'Ok world. We'll play the game by your rules. We'll make you care!' This shows that there is no justifying peace and that Arafat wants to go his own ways, which certainly links to terror. Again by 1988 Arafat was centred on whether to accept American demands mainly the idea behind the UN Resolution 242 which states that there could be an exchange of land in return for peace. This shows that the PLO are ready to accept the UNO as a legitimate peacekeeping organisation and therefore accepted the existence of the Jewish State of Israel. The policies have changed greatly but there is evidence, which suggests that in practise they stay similar, the same situation for my argument on terror. Another example is the Gulf War and that USA organised a coalition army to throw the Iraqis out of Kuwait. ...read more.

Conclusion

The over simplicity to pin point the policy given the desperate nature still proves in my opinion to be difficult to establish. All in all I conclude that the National Charter in 1964/8 changed dramatically on paper as shown by the signing of the PLO Accord in 1993. However the extreme movement of groups such as the Intifada and Hamas and Arafat on the Gulf War, proved to be an important factor in showing how closely related the policies were and how far they changed. This could be on paper or in practise and therefore I think Arafat has a different opinion on a lasting peace settlement in public than to appear as a traitor to the Palestinians. My final judgement is that there seems to be a clear change in theory but in practise there is this continuity of violence and terror which outlooks the PLO's view of peace. This makes you wonder if there is a balance of reason or just a smokescreen towards the Palestinians aims and beliefs. 1 1 Chris Warnes 11B 1 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Middle east section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Middle east essays

  1. Terrorism. What is terrorism? 2. Why do terrorists ...

    In 1948, America recognised Israel as a boundless state so that President Truman would gain votes from American Jews, and the rest of the world soon followed. Israel needed the support of America if it were to survive. 750,000 Palestinians were forced to leave their homeland.

  2. Book Review: Seeds of Terror

    provided funds, training, and some of the personnel to supplement Jemaah Islamiyah's home grown recruiting. It was the orders from al-Qaeda's number two that Jemaah Islamiyah switched from Plan A in Singapore to Plan B in Bali. Malaysia is often cited as a model for Southeast Asia.

  1. Armed Islamic Group [ Gia ]

    where many GIA guerillas had fought and release from the prison of bouyali's main comrade-in -arms al Mililani facilitated the formation of GIA movement. .It was afghanis in Algeria, among them Mourad Sid Ahmed, who transformed the relatively loose groups into a terrorist organization, with a markedly anti-FIS stance.

  2. Question 2 - What factors lead to the breakdown of the 1993 Israeli-Palestinian Peace ...

    Minister; he made clear from the beginning of his term, that he strongly opposed parts of the peace deal. The Arab moderated were disappointed with this decision, as there was no longer anyone to look out for them, as the peace deal once signified, however the fundamentalists were pleased, as

  1. Arab Israeli Conflict

    lands and the Sinai desert, the Gaza strip, Jordan, Syria and Jerusalem. This caused huge resentment of the Israelis and helped boost support for Yasser Aarafat and the PLO. But the main problem for the Israelis was that they had too much land to police and could not keep control

  2. Assess the effectiveness of the Arab and Israeli peace initiatives from the 1970s to ...

    A week later, on 22 October he met King Hussein and President Mubarak at Aqaba to work out the possibilities. On 3 November the United Nations General Assembly condemned Israeli oppression in the occupied territories and the violations of Palestinian human rights.

  1. Arab and Israeli conflict - source related study.

    When we see a British writer giving his views on the matter this shows that Britain are also involved in the conflict. The way I would explain the differences between the sources is that they are written from different points of view and reflect various opinion.

  2. Discuss whether a peaceful solution to the arab - Israeli conflict is possible.

    Arabs and Jews each have a claim to Israel. To understand these claims we should consider what some Arabs and Jews have expressed to substantiate their claims to this land. Unfortunately they are not prepared to compromise in this situation. Arabs, " this is our homeland. Our ancestors lived here in ancient times." Jews, " this is our homeland.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work