• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How Far Does the System for Electing the President Fulfil Democratic Criteria?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How Far Does the System for Electing the President Fulfil Democratic Criteria? In a democratic society such as the United States, there are several functions of elections, none more so than to allow democracy to prevail, hence the people of the country are given the opportunity, through voting, to decide who becomes president, thus everyone has a say in deciding who leads them. Understandably, there is a whole range of criteria to judge how democratic the US election system is. In short, the system is one that currently falls short of fully fulfilling the democratic criteria, however it does offer a relatively democratic system as a whole. A fundamental requirement of democracy is that of voter participation. The USA does offer men and women of all ethnic backgrounds the opportunity to participate in presidential elections, and as such this is a commendable asset to US democracy. On the other hand, participation levels are alarmingly low. In the 2000 presidential election approximately half of those eligible to vote actually bothered. This places much doubt on how representative the elected George W Bush really was. There is evidently a part, or a number of parts, to the electoral system which discourages people from voting hence such a low turnout. ...read more.

Middle

This means people have to keep re-registering so many will simply not bother. Steps were taken by president Clinton in 1993 to increase the number of people registered to vote. He introduced the 'Motor Voter Bill', which effectively allowed people to register to vote as they applied for a driving license. As a result, there was an increase in voters by 5 million. Yet still, by 2000 only 66% of Americans were registered to vote. It should be pointed out that of those registered, 75% or so do actually turn out to vote. In order to fulfil democratic criteria, everyone eligible need to vote in elections so that those elected will be representative of the people's views. Although this registration process appears to decrease the level of democracy, the fact is that there is nothing actually preventing those eligible from registering to vote. The process is just perhaps a little more difficult than it should be. Perhaps the most alarming aspect of the US electoral system is the fact that a candidate can win the presidency and yet poll less votes than their opponent. This occurred in the 2000 presidential campaign where Bush won the presidency for the Republicans yet had fewer votes than his opponent, Al Gore of the Democrats. ...read more.

Conclusion

However it has become apparent that candidates have found 'loop holes' in these precautions and thus there has been a growing trend of 'soft money' (see the table below). There is much controversy over where the line is drawn on what this 'soft money' can be spent on. President Clinton used carefully planned politically orientated events to generate this money such as 'Golf with the President' and trips on Air force One. The system for electing the president does however fulfil some democratic criteria. There is a secret ballot which eradicates corruption and any possible intimidation. The system also offers a coherent method of voting, as the voter simply has to vote for the candidate that they would like to take office. There are unarguably a high number of problems associated with the US system of electing a president and many areas that do not completely fulfil democratic criteria. Voter registration is too complicated, voting infrastructure is often old fashioned, voter choice is significantly limited, votes count unequally and are disproportionate and the media fails to remain impartial due to the influence of the wealthiest candidates. However the system does have its merits and does contain some aspects of democracy. There is a secret ballot, campaign regulations are in place and the election system is simple and coherent enough for the voter to understand. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Communism VS Democracy

    their base meanings are, critics may say that any further analysis of the relationship between the two terms would be tainted by their supposed definitions. The problem with this is that without a common frame of reference between the two, no comparison would be logically possible without considering an infinite range of possible meanings.

  2. Evolution of Democracy and the Athenian Constitution

    that it was risky to hit a slave in Athens since it may turn out to be citizen, implicitly pointing to the grave legal repercussions (in popular court) of such behavior. Now even the zeugitai--Solon's third class comprising of rich peasants--were allowed into the ranks of the Archons indicating, among

  1. The study of international or rather global politics, seeks to provide an account of ...

    The collapse of the bipolar system ushers in a new period of instability and conflict resulting from power rivalries. Challenges to security originate from disagreements over the limits of authority and the competition for power. For neo-realists, international politics is characterised by a relentless security competition in which war is always a possibility (Baylis & Smith 2001:257).

  2. To what extent do recent elections in the UK and the USA support the ...

    The original dealignment thesis was never intended to explain voting patterns in Britain. I also feel, that to cite dealignment is a too convenient approach to voting behaviour. Specifically, I think it ignores the political context of elections, as well as the candidates that are involved.

  1. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the system of choosing presidential candidates.

    This encouraged a higher level of political participation, as voters could feel a part of the decision making process. Some primaries, such as Michigan State, saw a significantly increased turnout in 2000 compared to 1996. Primaries however, do not ensure an electoral mandate; of those eligible to vote, only 1

  2. “How important are politics to characters’ relationships in ‘Middlemarch’ by George Eliot and ‘The ...

    Against Jago, fellows speculate as to whether he has made his name enough outside the college and it seems that he hasn't. It also transpires that Jago may not necessarily be suited to the role. Against Crawford, the general problem seems to be that he is a Scientist and to

  1. Analysis of Party Electoral Communications in the 1997 UK General Election.

    The earliest accounts, dating back to the 1920's, including Walter Lippmanns' "Public Opinion" impressed the rapid growth and potential each of mass communications, and stressed that the public could easily be swayed by "propaganda" on the radio and in newspapers, and was possibly quite harmful for democracies.

  2. Assess popper's treatment of the problem of induction

    He claims that, 2,"induction is a procedure which is logically invalid and rationally unjustifiable". Popper offers a very simple deductive solution to the problem. Professor Popper's theory has been expressed in the following way: . P1 --> TS --> EE --> P2 Where P1 is the initial problem, TS the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work