• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How Far Does the System for Electing the President Fulfil Democratic Criteria?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How Far Does the System for Electing the President Fulfil Democratic Criteria? In a democratic society such as the United States, there are several functions of elections, none more so than to allow democracy to prevail, hence the people of the country are given the opportunity, through voting, to decide who becomes president, thus everyone has a say in deciding who leads them. Understandably, there is a whole range of criteria to judge how democratic the US election system is. In short, the system is one that currently falls short of fully fulfilling the democratic criteria, however it does offer a relatively democratic system as a whole. A fundamental requirement of democracy is that of voter participation. The USA does offer men and women of all ethnic backgrounds the opportunity to participate in presidential elections, and as such this is a commendable asset to US democracy. On the other hand, participation levels are alarmingly low. In the 2000 presidential election approximately half of those eligible to vote actually bothered. This places much doubt on how representative the elected George W Bush really was. There is evidently a part, or a number of parts, to the electoral system which discourages people from voting hence such a low turnout. ...read more.

Middle

This means people have to keep re-registering so many will simply not bother. Steps were taken by president Clinton in 1993 to increase the number of people registered to vote. He introduced the 'Motor Voter Bill', which effectively allowed people to register to vote as they applied for a driving license. As a result, there was an increase in voters by 5 million. Yet still, by 2000 only 66% of Americans were registered to vote. It should be pointed out that of those registered, 75% or so do actually turn out to vote. In order to fulfil democratic criteria, everyone eligible need to vote in elections so that those elected will be representative of the people's views. Although this registration process appears to decrease the level of democracy, the fact is that there is nothing actually preventing those eligible from registering to vote. The process is just perhaps a little more difficult than it should be. Perhaps the most alarming aspect of the US electoral system is the fact that a candidate can win the presidency and yet poll less votes than their opponent. This occurred in the 2000 presidential campaign where Bush won the presidency for the Republicans yet had fewer votes than his opponent, Al Gore of the Democrats. ...read more.

Conclusion

However it has become apparent that candidates have found 'loop holes' in these precautions and thus there has been a growing trend of 'soft money' (see the table below). There is much controversy over where the line is drawn on what this 'soft money' can be spent on. President Clinton used carefully planned politically orientated events to generate this money such as 'Golf with the President' and trips on Air force One. The system for electing the president does however fulfil some democratic criteria. There is a secret ballot which eradicates corruption and any possible intimidation. The system also offers a coherent method of voting, as the voter simply has to vote for the candidate that they would like to take office. There are unarguably a high number of problems associated with the US system of electing a president and many areas that do not completely fulfil democratic criteria. Voter registration is too complicated, voting infrastructure is often old fashioned, voter choice is significantly limited, votes count unequally and are disproportionate and the media fails to remain impartial due to the influence of the wealthiest candidates. However the system does have its merits and does contain some aspects of democracy. There is a secret ballot, campaign regulations are in place and the election system is simple and coherent enough for the voter to understand. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Communism VS Democracy

    However, when examining the evidence of the relation of the two, let us not use the altered conceptions or versions of these terms, but rather analyze them by their base meanings as we have come to understand them. After this analysis of the terms and a resulting stipulation of what

  2. Evolution of Democracy and the Athenian Constitution

    While Pericles, in his grandiloquence, may have overstated the case it is true that the common citizen was much better off than in preceding times as Xenophon explains (On Democracy and Oligarchy, p: 39)

  1. To what extent do recent elections in the UK and the USA support the ...

    In Britain Labours landslide victory in 1997 has to have been influenced by John Majors' governments criticisms regarding 'sleaze' as well as its very public divisions over Europe. My point is, that, voting statistics believe the context of the election and the feelings of the electorate.

  2. The study of international or rather global politics, seeks to provide an account of ...

    As Keohane (in Viotti & Kauppi 1993:206) explains, "When realist theorists say that, given interests, patterns of outcomes will be determined by the overall distribution of power among states, they are using power to refer to resources that can be used to induce other actors to do what they would not otherwise do, in accordance with the desires of the power-wielder".

  1. “How important are politics to characters’ relationships in ‘Middlemarch’ by George Eliot and ‘The ...

    Royce lasts months longer than is originally forecast and this makes the formation of little parties within the college very difficult. Two candidates emerge in the form of Jago and Crawford. The consensus in the college is that they would both make very good Masters, but there are arguments against them.

  2. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the system of choosing presidential candidates.

    This encouraged a higher level of political participation, as voters could feel a part of the decision making process. Some primaries, such as Michigan State, saw a significantly increased turnout in 2000 compared to 1996. Primaries however, do not ensure an electoral mandate; of those eligible to vote, only 1

  1. Is consociational democracy democratic?

    Does this lie comfortably with the initial conception of democracy as government 'of the people'? What of accountability? Since the Federal Council makes its decisions in a collegial manner, no party can hold its representative government directly responsible18. The Swiss consociational system cannot therefore be said to be truly accountable

  2. Analysis of Party Electoral Communications in the 1997 UK General Election.

    Many PR related skills can be employed to persuade publics. The communication, unsurprisingly, is not always effective, can be misinterpreted, and so on, and we see quite often how politicians fail to get the right message across, because of poorly executed communication.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work