• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How Far Does the System for Electing the President Fulfil Democratic Criteria?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How Far Does the System for Electing the President Fulfil Democratic Criteria? In a democratic society such as the United States, there are several functions of elections, none more so than to allow democracy to prevail, hence the people of the country are given the opportunity, through voting, to decide who becomes president, thus everyone has a say in deciding who leads them. Understandably, there is a whole range of criteria to judge how democratic the US election system is. In short, the system is one that currently falls short of fully fulfilling the democratic criteria, however it does offer a relatively democratic system as a whole. A fundamental requirement of democracy is that of voter participation. The USA does offer men and women of all ethnic backgrounds the opportunity to participate in presidential elections, and as such this is a commendable asset to US democracy. On the other hand, participation levels are alarmingly low. In the 2000 presidential election approximately half of those eligible to vote actually bothered. This places much doubt on how representative the elected George W Bush really was. There is evidently a part, or a number of parts, to the electoral system which discourages people from voting hence such a low turnout. ...read more.

Middle

This means people have to keep re-registering so many will simply not bother. Steps were taken by president Clinton in 1993 to increase the number of people registered to vote. He introduced the 'Motor Voter Bill', which effectively allowed people to register to vote as they applied for a driving license. As a result, there was an increase in voters by 5 million. Yet still, by 2000 only 66% of Americans were registered to vote. It should be pointed out that of those registered, 75% or so do actually turn out to vote. In order to fulfil democratic criteria, everyone eligible need to vote in elections so that those elected will be representative of the people's views. Although this registration process appears to decrease the level of democracy, the fact is that there is nothing actually preventing those eligible from registering to vote. The process is just perhaps a little more difficult than it should be. Perhaps the most alarming aspect of the US electoral system is the fact that a candidate can win the presidency and yet poll less votes than their opponent. This occurred in the 2000 presidential campaign where Bush won the presidency for the Republicans yet had fewer votes than his opponent, Al Gore of the Democrats. ...read more.

Conclusion

However it has become apparent that candidates have found 'loop holes' in these precautions and thus there has been a growing trend of 'soft money' (see the table below). There is much controversy over where the line is drawn on what this 'soft money' can be spent on. President Clinton used carefully planned politically orientated events to generate this money such as 'Golf with the President' and trips on Air force One. The system for electing the president does however fulfil some democratic criteria. There is a secret ballot which eradicates corruption and any possible intimidation. The system also offers a coherent method of voting, as the voter simply has to vote for the candidate that they would like to take office. There are unarguably a high number of problems associated with the US system of electing a president and many areas that do not completely fulfil democratic criteria. Voter registration is too complicated, voting infrastructure is often old fashioned, voter choice is significantly limited, votes count unequally and are disproportionate and the media fails to remain impartial due to the influence of the wealthiest candidates. However the system does have its merits and does contain some aspects of democracy. There is a secret ballot, campaign regulations are in place and the election system is simple and coherent enough for the voter to understand. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Communism VS Democracy

    However, when examining the evidence of the relation of the two, let us not use the altered conceptions or versions of these terms, but rather analyze them by their base meanings as we have come to understand them. After this analysis of the terms and a resulting stipulation of what

  2. Evolution of Democracy and the Athenian Constitution

    He used intrigue to bring this about before the assembly like Ephialtes and Pericles did. According to Plutarch he was appointed general and induced the Athenians to send their infamous expedition to Sicily (p: 257/261/263)

  1. To what extent do recent elections in the UK and the USA support the ...

    This is just over half of the voting population in the UK and USA on which we make these assumptions. It is "poorer people and those with lower levels of education vote." (J. Doppelt and E. Shearer, 1999: 9). We must therefore be cautious of creating a mandate based on a voting picture that is less than whole.

  2. The study of international or rather global politics, seeks to provide an account of ...

    As such the more dependable the compliance of the population, the greater the potential power of the state (Duetsch 77). It can therefore be said that a state's power capabilities rest on its ability to maintain internal sovereignty. It is through power, the possession and accummulation thereof, that sovereign states interact and affect interactions in the international political arena.

  1. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the system of choosing presidential candidates.

    This encouraged a higher level of political participation, as voters could feel a part of the decision making process. Some primaries, such as Michigan State, saw a significantly increased turnout in 2000 compared to 1996. Primaries however, do not ensure an electoral mandate; of those eligible to vote, only 1

  2. “How important are politics to characters’ relationships in ‘Middlemarch’ by George Eliot and ‘The ...

    Not least of which is its length. It is not an inconsiderable read, and it cannot be taken lightly if someone has actually bothered to wade through the eight hundred and ninety-nine pages and a half of nineteenth century narrative for the killer last paragraph.

  1. Is consociational democracy democratic?

    Does this lie comfortably with the initial conception of democracy as government 'of the people'? What of accountability? Since the Federal Council makes its decisions in a collegial manner, no party can hold its representative government directly responsible18. The Swiss consociational system cannot therefore be said to be truly accountable

  2. Analysis of Party Electoral Communications in the 1997 UK General Election.

    Many PR related skills can be employed to persuade publics. The communication, unsurprisingly, is not always effective, can be misinterpreted, and so on, and we see quite often how politicians fail to get the right message across, because of poorly executed communication.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work