• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How Far Does the System for Electing the President Fulfil Democratic Criteria?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How Far Does the System for Electing the President Fulfil Democratic Criteria? In a democratic society such as the United States, there are several functions of elections, none more so than to allow democracy to prevail, hence the people of the country are given the opportunity, through voting, to decide who becomes president, thus everyone has a say in deciding who leads them. Understandably, there is a whole range of criteria to judge how democratic the US election system is. In short, the system is one that currently falls short of fully fulfilling the democratic criteria, however it does offer a relatively democratic system as a whole. A fundamental requirement of democracy is that of voter participation. The USA does offer men and women of all ethnic backgrounds the opportunity to participate in presidential elections, and as such this is a commendable asset to US democracy. On the other hand, participation levels are alarmingly low. In the 2000 presidential election approximately half of those eligible to vote actually bothered. This places much doubt on how representative the elected George W Bush really was. There is evidently a part, or a number of parts, to the electoral system which discourages people from voting hence such a low turnout. ...read more.

Middle

This means people have to keep re-registering so many will simply not bother. Steps were taken by president Clinton in 1993 to increase the number of people registered to vote. He introduced the 'Motor Voter Bill', which effectively allowed people to register to vote as they applied for a driving license. As a result, there was an increase in voters by 5 million. Yet still, by 2000 only 66% of Americans were registered to vote. It should be pointed out that of those registered, 75% or so do actually turn out to vote. In order to fulfil democratic criteria, everyone eligible need to vote in elections so that those elected will be representative of the people's views. Although this registration process appears to decrease the level of democracy, the fact is that there is nothing actually preventing those eligible from registering to vote. The process is just perhaps a little more difficult than it should be. Perhaps the most alarming aspect of the US electoral system is the fact that a candidate can win the presidency and yet poll less votes than their opponent. This occurred in the 2000 presidential campaign where Bush won the presidency for the Republicans yet had fewer votes than his opponent, Al Gore of the Democrats. ...read more.

Conclusion

However it has become apparent that candidates have found 'loop holes' in these precautions and thus there has been a growing trend of 'soft money' (see the table below). There is much controversy over where the line is drawn on what this 'soft money' can be spent on. President Clinton used carefully planned politically orientated events to generate this money such as 'Golf with the President' and trips on Air force One. The system for electing the president does however fulfil some democratic criteria. There is a secret ballot which eradicates corruption and any possible intimidation. The system also offers a coherent method of voting, as the voter simply has to vote for the candidate that they would like to take office. There are unarguably a high number of problems associated with the US system of electing a president and many areas that do not completely fulfil democratic criteria. Voter registration is too complicated, voting infrastructure is often old fashioned, voter choice is significantly limited, votes count unequally and are disproportionate and the media fails to remain impartial due to the influence of the wealthiest candidates. However the system does have its merits and does contain some aspects of democracy. There is a secret ballot, campaign regulations are in place and the election system is simple and coherent enough for the voter to understand. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Evolution of Democracy and the Athenian Constitution

    While Pericles, in his grandiloquence, may have overstated the case it is true that the common citizen was much better off than in preceding times as Xenophon explains (On Democracy and Oligarchy, p: 39)

  2. Communism VS Democracy

    As feudalism ended, a rich commercial middle class arose, possessing the money and leisure necessary to participate in governmental affairs. One result was the rebirth of a spirit of freedom based on ancient Greek and Roman principles. Concepts of equal political and social rights were further defined during the Renaissance,

  1. “How important are politics to characters’ relationships in ‘Middlemarch’ by George Eliot and ‘The ...

    Royce lasts months longer than is originally forecast and this makes the formation of little parties within the college very difficult. Two candidates emerge in the form of Jago and Crawford. The consensus in the college is that they would both make very good Masters, but there are arguments against them.

  2. British Democracy - the bestpossible system of government

    Therefore, for a Labour voter in Malvern or a Tory voter in Ebber Vale your vote has essentially been wasted, either you move to a different constituency or else you change sides, otherwise your vote will effectively not count. This begs the question whether a fairer proportional representation system would

  1. The Foreign Policy of an Islamic Presidential Democracy.

    "In the Name of God the Merciful and the Compassionate Faithful to the great sacrifices and to the memoryof our martyrs as well as to the ideals of the eternal November Revolution. I do solemnly swear by God the almighty that I will respect and glorify the Islamic religion, defend

  2. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the system of choosing presidential candidates.

    This encouraged a higher level of political participation, as voters could feel a part of the decision making process. Some primaries, such as Michigan State, saw a significantly increased turnout in 2000 compared to 1996. Primaries however, do not ensure an electoral mandate; of those eligible to vote, only 1

  1. T difficult for export orientated economics to sustain the land owning elites much longer. ...

    (Waisman, 1999, pp 71 - 131) The Oligarch parties were being challenged by a growing Radical party that was mobilising those who had been disenfranchised; their main argument was for voting rights to be extended through 'universal and secret

  2. Russia's Political Party System as an Obstacle to Democratization

    In addition, there was a general retreat from political involvement as people began to experience the hardship created by economic reform policies. During the period prior to the calling of elections in 1993, political party roots in society became shallower rather than deeper.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work