• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How has the party system changed between 1970 and 2001? (Use the data provided to illustrate your answer)

Extracts from this document...


How has the party system changed between 1970 and 2001? (Use the data provided to illustrate your answer) A party system is whereby a number of political parties exist in a particular country and these systems can be divided into four categories: the single-party system, the dominant party system, the two-party system and lastly the multi-party system. These systems are always evolving within a country and hence are not static. This therefore gives rise to changes in party systems and between 1970 and 2001 I believe that there has been diminutive change in the party system in Britain for the following reasons. Initially during the era of 1970 - 1979 as indicated by the data, there is adequate evidence to suggest that Britain pursued in the manner of a two-party system. This can be illustrated from the data as for a two- party system to exist; there must be a supremacy from two distinct parties in respect to the percentage votes cast and number of seats gained during an election compared to other parties. This means that all these other parties in relation to the two dominant parties, must have a trivial impact and significance to the percentage of votes cast and the number of seats gained, so that not to interfere or upset the two-party system balance. ...read more.


However there are some flaws, which do not entirely coincide with this conception, and both arguments are discussed in the following. During the period of 1983 - 1987 there is evidently an immense decline in seats for Labour compared to the Conservatives, which could in turn be superficially seen as an era of a dominance - party system. Confirmation to verify that this may be the case at a superficial level is that from the data the following can be denoted. From the data: " In 1983 the Conservatives gained 42.4% of the votes which was an enormous 14.8% higher than Labour who only gained 27.6% of the votes. In terms of seats there is again a great vital difference as the Conservatives gained 397 of the seats whilst Labour gained 188 seats less than the Conservatives at 209." These statistics give the misconception that the Conservatives are a dominant party as they had won both elections during this time period and also previous to that they had also won the 1979 election. Hence they fit the criteria for being crowned as the dominant party as they had won three consecutive elections and were winning a majority of seats and votes. ...read more.


that it has not reached dominance as they have not yet gained over 50% of the vote and have not yet gained support from all regions in the UK such as the South East. However compared to the Conservatives in the 1980s Labour is now more national than Thatcherism was. The Liberal Democrats are gradually becoming more significant and important in terms of seats as in 1992 they gained 17.8% of the votes and 20 seats but by 1997 with less votes at 17% they gained more seats of 46. Some may say that the significance of the Lib Dems makes a case for a two and a half - party system. To conclude from 1979 - 2001 generally Britain had pursued a two-party system. However there are certain periods during this time frame where lapses and variations occur and it could be argued that these lapses often concurred with a dominant-party system, whilst others believe that this could not have been the case due to insufficient criteria being fulfilled. Lastly periods in British politics are never long-term so it is hard to predict whether Britain will continue to follow a two-party system or whether it will convert to another system. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. What is the main reason for the loss of faith and interest in our ...

    In order for the questionnaire to be ethically sound the questionnaire will also have the opportunity for people to skip questions if they do not want to, or do not need to answer them. I will also include questions to gain personal information about the subjects such as, age range,

  2. The Labour Party.

    Secondly he got support from big businesses and companies as well as support from the trade unions. Thirdly he stated that the party required the following in order to gain power; a recruitment drive, a ballot on the manifesto, tighter control over candidate selection, indirect trade union sponsorship of MPs,

  1. Electoral Systems.

    Research by Democratic Audit in 1997 showed that the results could actually be even more distorting than under First-Past-The-Post. * It also does very little to give a voice to those who have been traditionally under-represented in parliament. * There is no transfer of powers from party authority to the voters, and it does not produce a proportional parliament.

  2. Disraeli and Modern Conservatism.

    The Post-War Consensus The Conservatives adapted to this setback whilst in opposition during the 1945-1951 Labour governments, and overhauled both organisation and policy. As a result, between the late 1940s and the early 1970s the Conservatives accepted the pillars of the post-war 'consensus': the Welfare State, the public ownership of

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work