• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How important was new Liberal ideology in leading to the welfare reforms of 1905-11?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How important was new Liberal ideology in leading to the welfare reforms of 1905-11? In answering this essay it is probably best to understand what is meant by ideology. Ideology is defined as a set of beliefs and aims by a group or groups of individuals who share the same common views. The word 'liberal' means being 'free.' The Liberal party is seen as a party that has an open mind over issues and follows what the majority of people want. In this essay I will explain the key issues that might have led to the Liberal party implementing these welfare reforms in Britain between 1905-11. 'New' something '-ism' is often just a name given by a party to show that their ideologies have evolved from previous, outdated times. 'New' Liberal ideology is looked at in the context of older Liberal beliefs. ...read more.

Middle

However, it did appeal to influential Liberals that were in power. This included the future Prime Minister Herbert Asquith. It is my belief that increased knowledge of poverty was more important than new Liberal ideology (aka New Liberlism). Many people in Britain were poverty stricken or in need for help. The government needed to find out exactly how people were getting into poverty. Seebohm Rowntree, a historian in the 19th-20th Century, carried out a survey into poverty in York. York was more typical of the whole country rather than the East End. Seebohm calculated a poverty line (minimum income necessary to stay out of poverty) based on scientific calculations. Those people that did not have the minimum income were in primary poverty and could not achieve physical efficiency. He discovered that those people who were in secondary poverty were there because they hadn't spent their money well enough. ...read more.

Conclusion

Changes to health and child reforms would also make Britain more efficient. Children were Britain's future prospects. By improving all aspects of their lives (especially those that were coming from poorer backgrounds), children would help Britain to become an all round superpower in 30-40 years to come. They were arguably the most needy of welfare reforms, which maybe explains why the Liberal party implemented many reforms regarding them between 1905-11. The need to win working class support and beat off challenges from the Labour party was the most important reason for the introduction of Welfare reforms between 1905-11. New Liberalism was based on political beliefs, but the need to resist the Labour parties potential challenge was based on political advantages. The 1903 Lib-Lab pact made Labour more of a threat on the political stage. They gained there most number of seats in Parliament in the 1906 elections and with the support of the majority of the working class and the Trade Unions; the labour party were proving to be capable opposition. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. What are the main ideological principles of the conservatives, Labour and Liberal democrats? To ...

    I feel the party stress social, equal and individual justice and therefore seem more left wing. According to the socioeconomic model people vote according to their class but the Lib Dems do not have a voting class and sometimes accused for being "unclear" about their ideology therefore must gain support from their policies.

  2. Analyse the main differences between Liberal and Marxist ideology

    This view of society is that the talented and best equipped people to lead and rule will rise to the top and do so accordingly. Another core value of liberalism is called civil society. This means that although individuals are given the opportunity to achieve "self mastery" in society, many

  1. Is the Liberal perspective on world politics too idealistic?

    One such example was the trial of Slobodan Milo´┐Żevic for war crimes and crimes against humanity during the Yugoslavia war. Futhermore, increased economic ties between countries resulted somewhat in the decline of the significance of nation borders. Nations are not neccesarily seeing security as the primary concern.

  2. Political Parties, Role and Ideology/Policies Qa (i) Ideology is the core fundamental beliefs ...

    areas, although in other areas there are still clear differences On the issue of tax and the economy which traditionally would have seen a clear divide in policies between the two parties but recently it has all changed, now they both favour only limited intervention in the economy that comes in the form of regulations implemented by the DTI.

  1. Assess critically Marx's distinction between ideology and science

    They have no history, no development; but men, developing their material production and their material intercourse, alter, along with this their real existence, their thinking and the products of their thinking.

  2. Why did the New Liberals attach so much importance to the reform of social ...

    Here they studied the poverty and plight of poorer citizens and considered remedies for the ills quantified. While these activities were initially not political it would be these men who found allegiance and even office in the Liberal party of 1906.

  1. Russia's Political Party System as an Obstacle to Democratization

    They conclude that a sizeable plurality of Russian voters is exhibiting signs of three criteria for the development of partisanship. First, attachment is growing with an accumulation of political experience. Second, as attachment grows, other views are acquiring more partisan consistency.

  2. How did Lenin add to Marxism up to 1905, and with what consequences?

    He wanted to control the party and maintain it as a fully organised and prepared revolutionary organisation. In these three statements Lenin has already added to Marxism. Marx did not state what the role of the communist party would be.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work