• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How might the House of Lords be reformed to make it more effective?

Extracts from this document...


How might the House of Lords be reformed to make it more effective? (25) Lords sat by reason of inheriting their titles and archbishops and bishops by reason of their rank in the church. Calls for reform of this distinctive chamber have previously been made, especially since the expansion of the franchise in the 19th century, producing a first chamber able to claim legitimacy through popular election. In 1884, after the Lords refused to pass the Franchise Bill, John Morley declared that the Lords should be 'mended or ended'. Lord Bryce declared that 'the House cannot go on as it is'. In the event, reform came in the twentieth century but demands for further change have continued. Before looking at we could reform the House of Lords, to make it more effective, we must first understand some of their weaknesses. ...read more.


However, only through appointment will the chamber be able to attract those who are not professional politicians- and particularly those who have no strong affiliation (union) to a political party. A mixed chamber allows the strengths of both the elected and appointed models to be combined. The Lords have peers who represent a wide variety of interests and expertise, being largely exceptional citizens with considerable specialised experience. This model also helps ensure that whilst the chamber gains legitimacy, it can never challenge the primacy of the fully elected House of Commons. Moreover, the mixed elected/appointed chamber has already been recommended by other groups that have reported on Lords reform, including the Royal Commission and the Public Administration Committee. The House of Lords currently has around 788 members. ...read more.


When the Commons voted, a majority of those taking part supported either a 60% or 80% elected House. Therefore, a second chamber which consists of 70% elected members would achieve broad public and political support, and meet the need for both greater legitimacy and protection of the independent element in the Lords. This will also ensure that the chamber represents the whole of the UK, and maintains a fair balance between the political parties. The inclusion of a large group of elected members will mean that the chamber is sufficiently legitimate in the eyes of the public to carry out its duties - including, at times, questioning the proposals/bills made by the government and the House of Commons. Overall, a part-elected, part-appointed chamber would have greater democratic legitimacy than the current arrangements and the fact that many members would be appointed would prevent too much party domination. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "The House of Commons is a highly effective parliamentary chamber" to what extent do ...

    4 star(s)

    Lastly, there have been recent reforms that have strengthened the legislative process. For example; since 2006, the committees scrutinising Bills have been given the additional power of taking evidence from experts. Also, the new backbench Business Committee has taken away some of the governments control over the parliamentary timetable.

  2. Draft a memorandum to the government evaluating the merits and demerits of differing reform ...

    party discipline especially if the constituencies were larger than those of the Commons elections. This undermines the purpose of the Upper Chamber in this country, namely to conduct freer and more reflective debate with fewer constraints and more independence. The second problem would be on how to find good candidates to stand for the new second chamber.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work