• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How revolutionary were Lutheran and Calvinist theories of authority?

Extracts from this document...


How revolutionary were Lutheran and Calvinist theories of authority? Lutheran and Calvinist theories of authority were revolutionary as they laid the foundations of a radical shift in attitudes towards obeying authority. Political thought changed from a view that it was never legitimate to resist authority to the notion that 'like any other wild animal, a tyrant can be killed.' However it was later Calvinist theories that were more revolutionary than Calvin's own work On Civil government and Luther's On Secular authority. Moreover rather than promoting revolutionary theories of authority, Luther and Calvin were concerned to preserve order. Revolutions occurring throughout Europe in the sixteenth and seventeenth century were to an extent legitimised by Lutheran and Calvinist theories of authority but this was certainly not the original intent of the writings. Luther and Calvin were after all theologians, not political philosophers. The Lutheran and Calvinist theories of authority were a radical departure in political thinking in the sixteenth century in terms of an obligation to submit to authority. The tradition of biblical thought suggested that obligation was fundamental and thus, it was not considered legitimate to resist authority. Christian political theory was underpinned by the divine word of God, which stated 'obey the powers that be.' (Romans 13) ...read more.


'I will not obey' if a prince or secular Lord invokes laws which is against their conscience and would not be fulfilling their duty to God. 'The spread of the Reformation led to a general upheaval in political thinking which was the direct consequence of his theology'.7 'It is doubtful how far Luther himself recognised the revolutionary consequences of his teaching at the beginning.'8 On reflection Luther said, I simply taught, preached, wrote God's word: otherwise I did nothing. And when, while I slept, or drank Wittenberg beer with my Philip and Amsdorf, the Word so greatly weakened the papacy that never a Prince or Emperors inflicted such damage upon it. I did nothing, the word did it all.'9 'Luther was first and foremost a theologian. When he addressed political issues he did so as a theologian.'10 'Despite their non-revolutionary aims, Martin Luther and his co-reformers profoundly changed central and northern Europe for good.'11 Luther's arguments were essentially conservative in responding to authority emphasising the duty of not obeying ungodly political authority. Luther preferred the principle of non-resistance. 'Rebellion was, in Luther's eyes, the worst of all possible sins, for it threatened the very foundations of civil society.'12 All the early reformers, including Calvin, shared Luther's belief in the divine character of government and the sinfulness of rebellion. ...read more.


He maintains that it is misleading to look to sixteenth century Calvinist theories as the originators of radical resistance theory. Although Skinner concedes that the sixteenth century European revolutions were led by professed Calvinists, he argues that the justifying theories behind these actions were not specifically Calvinist. 21 For example Skinner claims that Buchanan was restating the ideas of John Mair (1467-1550). Mair was the channel of the radical scholastic ideas to the Calvinist revolutionaries. His pupils included Calvin, John Knox and George Buchanan. Moreover Skinner sees the Calvinist theories as based upon the foundation of earlier Catholic political philosophy of the radical scholastics. Thus Skinner's perspective asserts that Calvinist theories of authority were not as revolutionary as Walzer asserts as their origins were rooted in earlier political thinkers. Although Luther and Calvin broke with the simplicity of Romans 13, the argument developed by Luther and Calvin laid considerable stress on the language of religious duty and the office of inferior magistrates. Emphasis was on inferior magistrates acting on behalf of the people against a tyrant rather than calling private men to arms. They were thus concerned to reinforce authority. Luther and Calvin did not seek to encourage rebellion against authority but were more concerned to preserve social order. They still fundamentally believed that resistance against authority was offensive to God. Nonetheless Lutheran and Calvinist theories of authority were revolutionary to the extent that Europe in the sixteenth century radically changed as a result. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Ethos, Pathos & Logos in Dr. Martin Luther King's "Letter from Birmingham Jail"

    The conditions under them, therefore, call for immediate action. To communicate effectively, ethos is never enough. People respond to emotions and personality as well. In the following two quotes, Dr. King's vivid details invite readers to experience the daily lives of African Americans under the laws of segregation.

  2. Can feminism be thought of as a theory of law or, otherwise, fundamental in ...

    This is coupled by the notion that parenting is predominantly the female's role, which is highlighted by the "very limited provisions for paternity leave."13 The underlying problem here is that, in order to be treated fairly and without any prejudice women are required to meet a norm set by existing

  1. What exactly is Weber's Protestant Ethic Thesis?

    Sociologists generally use the term 'capitalist' to describe a particular way in which economic production is organised. Karl Marx is considered to be the major interpreter of modern society as capitalist society, and more specifically, he saw capitalism as an economic system in which the main priority is the maximization of profit, achieved through the exploitation of labour.

  2. Deontology- a theory based purely on obligation or duty.

    The natural obligation that all human beings have helps to form the idea of universal law mentioned above. This idea, formulated by Immanuel Kant, defines deontology, briefly restating the theory and emphasizing its dependence on obligation or duty. Robert Nozick, another well-known philosopher and supporter of deontology, branches off from Kant's argument with his theory entitled side constraints.

  1. Compare and contrast some of the ways in which major political thinkers have tried ...

    According to Hobbes the established civil state backed by the sovereignty becomes the supreme authority with absolute power, therefore make the law and enforces it by such powers, this implies that whoever went against or offended the law was to be punished or convicted thus citizens will fear to break

  2. Why was the Dreyfus Affair so bitterly divisive in France? The Dreyfus Affair began ...

    The issues which divided these two so bitterly will be discussed. During the early 1890's France was going through a period of trade depressions. Prices were falling, rents were down, and there was high unemployment and hunger.7 France had also suffered an embarrassing military defeat at the hands of Prussia in 1871.

  1. "Hegel legitimised the French Revolution but not the Revolutionaries themselves" Discuss.

    the will is thought or reason, and the will is only free when it follows nothing but its own thought, the thought or reason in question turns out not to be that of man alone, rather than of the cosmic spirit which posits the universe.3 Here again it can be

  2. Compare Hobbes and Locke's views on the obligation to obey the law.

    Political obligation is meant to be an obligation to obey the laws of your own state, the state of which you are a citizen, not the laws of any state you happen to be resident in or travelling through.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work