• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How successful have the UK constitutional reforms been since 1997?

Extracts from this document...


How successful have the constitutional reforms been? (Since 1997) Constitutional reform is a process in which the government or the relationship between the government and the state is changed. Since 1997 there have been several reforms to our constitution, but there is a constant debate to whether the reforms have brought success to our country or not. Firstly, The House Of Lords reform, whereby lords are not brought in via family, they will be elected a lord based on achievements and specialized skills, for example Lord Sugar was brought in to influence the UK?s business. The House of Lords reform act (1999) decreased the number of hereditary lords to just 92. If lords are elected into the second chamber it will cause a dead lock between the House of Commons and the House of Lords as the two houses are mirrored. This will cause our government to become less decisive and this will lead to negativity for the population of the UK. On the other hand the reform act brings success, as the elected lords will improve the democracy compared to the current arrangements this will allow smaller parties to be represented in a better fashion. Also if the lords are elected via proportional representation this will also increase the democracy of the population of the UK as they choose who they want to represent them. ...read more.


Also the Freedom of Information act also allows for the public access to governmental documentation, this is thought to have been one of the acts successes as it is working towards a more open government. But today information is so widely available that even our government is scared. Tony Blair said ?it?s the worst mistake of my life?. This reference to the Freedom of Information act clearly shows that MP?s cannot voice their true and legit opinions on matter without being scrutinized. They can be scrutinized via the media. The expenses scandal is a prime example. MP?s expenses were shown to the public and the media set off a huge firework and ripped certain MP?s via complete exposure, but from another perspective this can be seen as a positive as the FOIA stops corruption with funds and expenses. The FOIA also brings a few negatives. The easily obtainable information is a large reason to why MP?s don?t voice their opinion as they may also be pushed into the hot seat for saying something wrong. The lack of MP?s being open could have a negative impact on the way the country is run, as issues may not be rectified and discussed properly. So the two arguments are balanced but as you can see the positive effects of the FOIA are much larger, overall it ensures that MP?s don?t set foot out of line. ...read more.


So in 2003 the decision was taken to reform the judiciary. This brings its strengths and weakness? to whether the reform is regarded as successful. Firstly an advantage is the fact that the judiciary can claim to be fully independent this prevents any political influence upon the judiciary. The independence of the judiciary has improved via the reform as the government has less of an influence on the judiciary?s decisions. Secondly the reform eliminates the ambiguity of the role of the Lord Chancellor, this again separates the judiciary from the government, this brings great success as it portrays a much more democratic system and allows citizens to seek judicial advice easier than the previous system. Lastly the reform brings Britain into line with modern constitutional practice, the JAC was set up in the reform to insure that judges were put to power regarding their qualifications instead of political views. Overall we see the success of the reform through its increase in democracy and prevention of political influence. This reform supports Britain?s proposal of a modern democracy. Overall we see that the various reforms to our constitutions have been either successful or successful with slight gaps such as the HRA. Many argue for and against the post 1997 reforms. Our constitution allows for flexibility so as time continues the success of reforms shall increase. The reforms above mainly propose an increase in democracy and in many peoples views have delivered success. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How successful has constitutional reform been since 1997 ?

    3 star(s)

    They proposed the incorporation of the European convention of human rights into british law . Also the Freedom of information act . However , this act wasn't passed till 2000, and wasn't effective till 2005 . It afforded the public the right to see official documents .

  2. To what extent have constitutional reforms since 1997 reduced the powers of the UK ...

    For example education is now run by the Scottish Parliament. At birth of devolution it was argued that hardily any powers have really moved as the labour party had a majority in all the devolved parliaments and was in government.

  1. Discuss the indepedence of the UK Judiciary

    Secondly, that nobody 'not even the prime minister, or a government minister' is above the law, so anyone can be brought to trial if they break the law. Third, Dicey stated, the constitution itself to some extent consists of judicial decisions created in the past that guarantee the right to

  2. How, and with what success, have governments attempted to improve the provision of health ...

    This is by slashing spending on NHS QUANGO's. They attempt slash spending on the QUANGO's by 20% and the pay of health service managers as to their accordance 'The NHS is a bureaucratic monster'. The Conservatives are in consensus with this as announced on their 2009 conference they believe �1.5bn a year can be saved on bureaucracy.

  1. Apart from referendums, explain three ways in which democracy in the UK could be ...

    Supplementary Vote (SV) The Supplementary Vote system is used to elect the Mayor of London and other elected mayors in England and Wales. The SV system is very similar to the AV system.

  2. Evaluate the effectiveness of the various ways in which participation and democracy could be ...

    there is also no definite way of ensuring that the vote was cast in secret and without undue pressure. Those opposed to E-voting have also argued the lack of success in causing a considerable increase to turnout in E-voting pilots.

  1. To what extent have constitutional reforms introduced since 1997 made the UK more democratic?

    to the untrained eye it will look like these countries can be their own. However, the plan for devolution wasn?t really as clear as people thought, and it could even be argued that instead of making the country more democratic, it?s just caused rifts between people, as Parliament still holds

  2. British policies that have taken place since the end of the Second World ...

    The next ideology I?m going to look briefly at is Marxism also known as socialism. Marxism was first introduced by Karl Marx who believed in having a classless society in the 1600?s. Marxists believed that there were two main groups who were relevant in making the economic system worked.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work