• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How valid is this interpretation of Disraeli's career and achievements in the period 1846-1880? In my opinion John Walton makes valid interpretation of Disraeli's political achievements

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"A schemer who hid his opportunism behind a smokescreen of high sounding phrases" (John Walton, an academic historian and specialising in modern British history written in a student textbook, Disraeli 1990) How valid is this interpretation of Disraeli's career and achievements in the period 1846-1880? In my opinion John Walton makes valid interpretation of Disraeli's political achievements within his career. It can be argued that Disraeli's existence within the political world was down to his opportunism. We know that Disraeli was fighting for a position in the House of Commons and to be taken seriously, however it was not until he married Mary Ann Lewis did his career conveniently start to advance. There is no denial he loved his wife, but he took an opportunity that presented itself, when he married her. Her former husband was an Mp and with her contacts and influence she helped kick start Disraeli's real political career. ...read more.

Middle

Another example of Disraeli's opportunism can be seen within the 1874 intoxicating liquors act. This achievement within in his career was an act of opportunism to benefit himself and his campaign. Disraeli extended the opening hours of pubs by 30 minutes. In exchange for this bill Disraeli received increased extra funding for his campaign. This is yet another achievement within Disraeli's career that had an opportunist motive behind it. When looking at the source from John Walton it must be acknowledge with some respect. He is an academic historian who clearly has a thorough understanding of Disraeli and his political career. The extract is taken from a text book about Disraeli so it is not a general sweeping statement. John Walton obviously knows a lot aboput Disraeli, well at least enough to write a book. The book was published in 1990, which tells us that this historian had a lot of time for reflection and worked with probably primary and secondary sources. ...read more.

Conclusion

They were acts to benefit all his party and the people he was representing. Disraeli made the conservative party ellectable again after years in opposition as a result of the 1846 split. He helped to improve its administration, setting up central office, He gave it some of its core beliefs in the crown, the church and the empire as well as making it the party that had an appeal to all classes and therefore expressed national unity. Disraeli genuinely believed in his ideas and did not have opportunist intention. A lot of his ideas and beliefs were not based on opportunism and the things he did like passing the many reform acts between the years 1874-1878 cannot be described as opportunism. In conclusion I believe that John Walton's interpretation of Disraeli's career and achievements was extremely valid and accurate. There is a lot of evidence that supports John Walton's idea. Also the fact that John Walton is an academic Historian who has studied Disraeli further strengthens the argument that his interpretation is valid. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Notes on John Stuart Mill's On Liberty

    b) Necessary social duties: A second exception is that a government may compel its citizens to perform certain tasks that are essential to the preservation of itself as an ordered society. For example, the government must be allowed to draft people for the common defense of the nation, and must be

  2. How have political sociologist understood globalization? Globalization is perhaps the central concept of ...

    Robertson's view of globalization is often referred to as the 'World Culture Theory' as it gives a particular insight into how participants in the process of globalization become conscious of and give meaning to living in the world as a single place.

  1. How are distinctions made between factual reporting, interpretation and distortion ?

    An individual's interpretation to any piece of information can be based on that's individual's personality. This is due to his/her imagination, ideology and the logic used to interpret the source. It is the individual who receives the information who decides whether the source is reliable or not, and whether he/she wants to believe what it is in it.

  2. To what extent did the key political ideas directly Influence change and development in ...

    whilst the majority of people would tire night and day helping the elite achieve their aims of being richer and more powerful. Marx also wrote on how every system that would take this form would be plagued with conflict, as the rich attempted to exploit the poor.

  1. Extent of key political ideas in directly influencing change and development .

    could be said to be speaking for the major part of the Confederation in international economic affairs. It could also be argued that the unification of Italy by France in 1859 shaped not only the timing but also the nature of German Unification as it revived fears of napoleonic armies crossing the Rhine.

  2. Why did caudillismo triumph over liberalism in the politics of Latin America before 1880?

    But, due to the population's bent towards custom and tradition - which meant the same oligarchies which ruled pre-independence Latin America still held sway - an impersonal bureaucratic state ruling from the centre was an unwelcome manifestation of their hard fought for independence.

  1. Russia's Political Party System as an Obstacle to Democratization

    Although a founding election might have reversed this trend, there simply was no incentive for the political leadership of the now independent Russian Federation to oversee such a political contest; the Soviet Union's collapse left them holding the reins of power, and they could claim legitimacy on the basis that they had been popularly elected, albeit under the old system.

  2. Roosevelt's political career in years to 1932

    Roosevelt did not agree with their choice because Sheelan had too many connections with big businesses and would not pay any attention to the poor people in the state. So he and some fellow party members decided to block Sheelan's election by refusing to vote for him.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work