• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Identify and explain how the constitution attempts to create a separation of powers in the United States' political system.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

IDENTIFY AND EXPLAIN HOW THE CONSTITUTION ATTEMPTS TO CREATE A SEPARATION OF POWERS IN THE UNITED STATES' POLITICAL SYSTEM In the 18th Century, the French philosopher Montesquieu, who had been one of the inspirations behind the French Revolution, argued that limitation would be necessary within government within government in order to avoid tyranny. He identified the Executive, the Legislature and the Judiciary as the four braches of government which needed to be separated. To do this, he suggested the 'Separation of Powers', a mechanism built internally into government where each branch would have powers enabling it to limit those of another so no one branch becomes too powerful. The Founding Fathers of the American Constitution agreed with Montesquieu's ideas and introduced a system of checks and balances into the Constitution to support the Separation of Powers. There are several ways in which Separation of Powers is achieved by the Constitution. ...read more.

Middle

A two-thirds majority in both Houses of Congress in turn can again override this veto. Now to take the Legislature and Judiciary, the Judiciary in the US government is the US Supreme Court. The Senate, for example, must approve all judicial appointments. Congress has the powers to create new lower courts, change the number of judges and impeach/remove judges for misbehaviour. On the other side this time, the Supreme Court can rule an act of Congress as unconstitutional and interprets the laws passed by Congress. Last, we can also observe how the US Constitution creates Separation of Powers between the Executive and Judiciary. While the President appoints all federal judges, the Supreme Court can rule Presidential actions unconstitutional, can rule against the Executive in cases and can issue or refuse warrants to allow police search. ...read more.

Conclusion

Some since have argued that the 'checks and balances' should be reviewed because they may not provide satisfactory Separation of Powers. The system of checks and balances have also been under heat for not providing satisfactory Separation of Powers because some have observed how since the 19th Century right up to the modern day, the presidential authority seems to dominate in government. They observe how President Thomas Jefferson in 1803 authorised the 'Louisiana Purchase' without the consult of Congress. This more than doubled the size of the US and used up funds in the US budget therefore Congress is shown as weak for not forcing itself to take part in this crucial decision. Another example can be seen where President Abraham Lincoln ordered the blockade of southern ports and increased the number enlisted in the army again without Congressional authorisation during the Civil War. By the 1960's too, during the Vietnam War, the Presidents had undoubted primacy/hegemony in the handling of defense policy ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. Using examples, explain the limitations on the Supreme Courts powers.How do Presidents veto legislation, ...

    The president has three significant checks on the Court. Most importantly is the power to nominate judges to the Court. By choosing justices of a certain political and judicial philosophy, the President may seek to change the nature of the Court.

  2. How is Britain's constitution changing in the 21st century?

    This is making questions that are at national level become important at European level and smacks of the idea of a European super state, moving a unitary Britain to possibility of being a unit of a federal organisation, and further a written constitution for all EU member countries.

  1. Doctrine of the separation of powers.

    They have no direct power to initiate Bills but the president can recommend legislation in his message to Congress. He can veto legislation but can be overridden by 2/3 majority in both Houses. Treaties are negotiated by him but must be approved by 2/3 of the Senate.

  2. Presidential Powers

    However, it can then turn into a cycle as the President can bypass this by issuing further executive orders, but this has lead to conflict between the Legislative and Executive branches.

  1. An 18th Century Strait-jacket - Is this a fair description of the Constitution?

    Literalists are less likely to find room for flexibility in the Constitution. For example, let us take the following extract from Article 6 of the Constitution: "The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United

  2. To what extent is the American Constitution an elitist document?Why then did the framers ...

    Section 2 "Representatives [and direct taxes] shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective numbers"4 - taxation and representation based upon population. This meant in essence that a rich man paid exactly the same amount of tax as a poor

  1. Politics and Satire. In the United States the First Amendment protects satirists. There ...

    a forceful and tyrannical leader, which was what the rival Whigs intended (King Andrew the First). Cartoons have such an affect on people because the reader cannot refute the cartoon with a counter argument, as can be accomplished in a letter to the editor.

  2. American Government Term Paper #1. Discuss the theory of Checks and Balances as outlined ...

    The framers wanted to ensure the people that the Constitution would not be a danger to them, by stating any power not listed were not going to be granted at all (We the People). Expressed powers are specific powers granted to the Congress in the Constitution.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work