• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In this essay i will be discussing why many British colonies demanded independence from Britain in the years immediately after the Second World War.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History GCSE coursework Independence for India Question 1 In this essay i will be discussing why many British colonies demanded independence from Britain in the years immediately after the Second World War. The two colonies involved were Kenya and India. In 1900 the largest empire was British and they had ruled over India for 200 years. Also, a lot of African countries were part of the empire. One of the countries Britain ruled in Africa was Kenya, where white farmers owned much of the land. Before world war two, Indians were quite happy living under Britain and they enthusiastically supported the British Empire. However, when the war began, Britain needed more money and so they raised taxes in India to get the money they needed. India, in total gave Britain over �120 million over the two years. As the war went on, foods and materials were sent to Britain creating shortages. It was because of this that it became more expensive to get food and cloth, so as a result the standard of living for the Indians fell. This made Indian people unhappy living under British and soon riots and fighting broke out, as India demanded their independence. Another reason that Kenya and India wanted their independence is because they didn't have social justice. ...read more.

Middle

In the 1940's people began talking about the 'united states of Europe.' This meant that the American led west Europeans combined together to form a superpower. The ECSC stood for 'European coal and steel community.' It was set up so that the coal industries on both sides of the river Rhine could work together easily. The six members of the ECSC were France, West Germany, Belgium, Holland, Luxemburg and Italy. They agreed to put all coal and steel production under a joint authority on which all six governments could be represented. In the 1950's the success of the ECSC led to the setting up of the EEC (European Economic Community.) It had the same six members as the ECSC and it was organised to so that there was free trade between the six countries. There were 180 million people in all six countries and so the manufacturers would have a very big market to sell to. There was also a council of ministers set up, to have control of the new system, and a commission of officials were used to run it. Britain decided not to join the EEC and instead to join the rival organisation of the EEC, EFTA (European trade association.) the main reason they didn't the EEC was because Britain saw them selves as a world power, not a European one. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, so far, Britain hasn't joined. In this section I will be discussing how the EEC has affected Britain socially and culturally. One way it has affected us is that 10 % of money from the EEC goes towards helping poorer areas of Europe, where there is high unemployment and homelessness. Also, 7 % of EEC money goes towards building schemes and training of the unemployed. Being part of the EEC has affected us socially because the EEC countries now trade with poorer countries. Britain and France still trade with countries that used to be in their empire. They give them foods, and manufactured goods to pay for roads, schools and hospitals in third world countries. At first this seems a good idea but high interest rates makes poorer in the long run. Another way it affects us culturally is that we have EEC passports instead of British ones which allows us to travel freely around EEC countries and even get a job there. I conclusion, the British was effected in many ways by the EEC. In my opinion, the most important effect has been the economic effect. This is because it has given farmers more profit as they have a bigger market to sell to. The negative effect of the EEC is that even though we give money to third world countries, it actually makes them poorer because of high interest rates. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. Why did Britain join the EEC in 1973 and not in 1957?

    Britain had the strongest coal and steel industries in Europe, the industries being the basis of the Labour party's political power, it was a great British strength. By joining the ECSC Britain was being asked to share it. Foreign Secretary Herbert Morrison comment to Cabinet about how the miners would

  2. Why did many British colonies demand independence from Britain in the years immediately after ...

    Indians were also increasingly angry because of what happened in the Anritsar massecar. There was a large unarmed crowed gathered in the Jalianwalla bagh, an open space enclosed by walls. Dyer marched with so soldiers to the scene and without ordering the crowed to move, he lined his men

  1. Free essay

    Has British Politics been Europeanised

    had produced war in 1939."7 This illustrates the idea that the European Union reduces the autonomy of countries and furthermore, interferes with the governing of the countries. This consequently results in European countries adjusting their governing system to suit the European Union, and therefore, resulting in them becoming 'Europeanised'.

  2. Transformation of the U.S. Hegemony in Europe through NATO after the Cold War

    and then to underline the determination for a better cooperation among the European Union nations (solidarity). The modern efforts go back to 1940s. The creation of Western Union (WU) in 1948, the Pl�ven plan in 1950 and later the refusal of European Defense Community by the French parliament in

  1. The question of whether Britain should gravitate toward adopting the euro is indeed an ...

    if they're going to be able to survive with exactly the same interest rate as all the other countries (Member States) (The Economist v. 266 March 1, 2003 p. 53). In the event that the British economy was to exhibit little to no growth, financial adjustments could be made to keep the deficit from exceeding the GDP.

  2. The aim of this essay is to present the reason of British government changing ...

    It was at this point that pro-European movements and supporters of federalism moved into action and vigorously promoted the idea of European unification. Closely associated with financial circles and demonstrating allegiance to a particular political tendency, or seeking, on the contrary, to mobilize the mass of public opinion, these movements,

  1. Road freight transport - Paying its way?

    about 23% of total carbon dioxide emissions, and within this, road traffic is one of the fastest growing sources. While, road transport accounts for the highest proportion of all CO2 emissions from transport (CfTI 2001), the European Council and the European Parliament have targets to reduce CO2 emissions from motor vehicles by 2010 (EDIE 2002).

  2. An examination of British policy with regard to European Unity during the period 1945 ...

    Having outlined and discussed events of the post war period, the reasons behind British policy can next be established. This will form this main part of the essay. The extent to which the 1945-1951 Labour government's anti-European Unification stance was warranted will be viewed and the major explanations of an isolationist British policy, outlined.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work