• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In this report I will talk about four of the different types of voting system, and which one out of them I find most preferable.

Extracts from this document...


Which is the most preferable voting system? In this report I will talk about four of the different types of voting system, and which one out of them I find most preferable. The four systems I will talk about are; first past the post, Additional member system, single transferable vote and the proportional voting system. The first system I will talk about is the one used in England when a general election is held. This is called 'First Past the Post' (FPTP). England is split into constituencies and in each of the constituencies a candidate from the different parties stands to get elected. The people within each constituency vote for their favourite candidate in the hope they will get in. After all the votes have been counted the new consistency MP is announced, This all happens across the country and at the very end the amount of MP's from each party is counted to see how many seats they have gained in parliament, the party with the most seats becomes government. When talking in terms of proportionality, I feel that this method is not very, this is because the number of sets a party gets is not based on how many votes they received. ...read more.


This also opens up the degree of choice for people, as they are not limited to one vote, and the fact they have an extra vote opens up the possibility of having both, your favourite MP in your area and your favourite party in power, both of whom do not have to be from the same party. This system is also much fairer on smaller parties. This is thanks to the top up seats that the list system provides meaning there is a chance for them to get into parliament, but not have too much power if they are extremist parties. All these positive points would also affect turnout results, boosting them as people don't have to worry quite so much about wasted votes and tactical voting (through there is still the opening for both in this system). However there is one shortcoming for this system that stems directly from the second ballet. This being, which the MPs who are brought in through the second ballet don't look after a constituency and so are floating MP's. This is a concern as no one knows who they are or what their effects will be in parliament, or even what they believe and their ideologies. ...read more.


This would be due to the fact that MP's from different parties would have to be spread out after the election to see how many seats each party had gained. The proportional representation system is very fair on smaller parties and this is because of the high degree of choice it offers, and the possibility for any party to gain seats. However this is not always a good thing as it would pave the way to allow extremists into parliament. So in conclusion to my report I feel I have noticed an emerging pattern. The more proportional a system gets, the more likely a coalition is and the higher the choice levels and fairness to smaller parties. In comparing all these advantages and short comings, I feel the best system is the additional member system. This is because although it is not as proportional as STV or proportional representation it does allow for some proportionality. It also may allow more coalitions however when compared to the Italian government whom use Proportional Representation, the governments produced will be stable and will still allow bills to be passed. AMS also allows the strong constituency link to be maintained, as that is a big part to voters who like to know who is looking after their area. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. priministers power

    This group constituted those MPs whose loyalty was principally to the party itself, and to its electoral success, rather than to any particular strand of thought within the party/ As long as the leader provides competent and successful leadership, loyalty follows; if the leader falters, the party faithful start to waver.'

  2. Democracy and Voting

    Gladiators: Those that actually take part in the politics (MPs, forefront of politics, direct action) 2. Spectators: Those who observe and limit participation to voting 3. Apathetics are the non participants. Don't watch or care about outcome of elections. Parry et all findings: 23.2% involved in variety of activities beyond voting, 51% limited participation to voting, 25.85% were inactive.

  1. What is the main reason for the loss of faith and interest in our ...

    of the people who have the right to vote that actually use their vote. 7Below is a table created by a parliament department, with some staggering results that illustrate the changes to the voter turnout for general elections from 1945-2005. Election Turnout in the UK (%) Change in turnout (%)

  2. The Labour Party.

    List of some Key policies: * Pro Britain's entry into the European Single Currency. * Proportional Representation in elections. * Legalisation of Cannabis. * Scrap Tuition fees. * Fewer regulations for business and support of free-market. * Reduce voting age to sixteen.

  1. Unit 1 - Example of Evaluations

    use as well as the layout and what type of information they feature on their pages. Newsletter Evaluation The purpose of this document was to create a newsletter for the record label company; it contains information about the record label artists, a competition and a feedback page.

  2. Democracy and the British Voting System.

    One suggestion to improve democracy is lowering the voting age. There are lots of arguments in favour of this; such as 16 year olds are able to pay taxes, go to war, marry and have a child. For them to be able to fight and even die for our country,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work