• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In what sense is the UK's Parliamentary System said to be undemocratic?

Extracts from this document...


In what sense is the UK's Parliamentary System said to be undemocratic? Over the years some people have argued that Britain's Parliamentary system in places is undemocratic. The arguments lie in the Elective system and Parliament. The most argued issue has been our "First Past the post" voting system. The FPTP questions the whole issue of democratic elections in that the majority will of the people within one constituency may be reflected in the electoral outcome. Of the Candidates standing in a given constituency, the one who receives the highest number of votes is elected. The system works fine when there are only two parties, but it becomes undemocratic as soon as you introduce a third candidate but in practice in the vast majority of constituencies there will be more than two parties standing as candidates. ...read more.


Critic's point out that what decides general elections happens in a small number of marginal constituencies. Usually, around 500 seats are "safe" seats in these seats; the result is almost a foregone conclusion. The winning party gains more votes than it needs to win. Votes for other parties count for little. In marginal seats every vote is important. The results in marginal s determine the complexion of the government. In Britain we have a fusion of powers unlike the Americans who have a separation of powers. This means that the Prime minister and the House of commons are directly linked and the commons holds the majority of the Prime minister s party. ...read more.


Recently Tony Blair has emphasised that the amount of Hereditary peers in the House of Lords in Undemocratic. The criticism has been that, as an un-elected body, which is not accountable to the electorate, it is an undemocratic institution. Other criticisms have been that the Prime minister can recommend the appointment of life peers since this gives him the power of patronage. The other is the fact the House of Lords is out dated. Not only is the hereditary principle is out dated, they argue, it also helps to restrict the social composition of the house. Heredity and patronage, critics argue, can no longer be justified as the basis for choosing part of the legislature. It is the matter of political principle that those chosen by the electorate in an election since elections ensure that representative are accountable for their actions. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. In what sense is the UKs Parliamentary System said to be undemocratic?

    gained 16.8% of the vote but only got 46 seats. The Tories gained 4 % more (30.7%) of the vote but gained 165 seats. Labour won 43.4% of the votes and gained 419 sears. At a proportionate level, the liberal Democrats should have got around 106 seats in Westminster if

  2. 'Britain is in desperate need of electoral reform. The FPTP system is undemocratic.' Discuss.

    Single Transferable vote, however, is a proportional representation system which means that the number of votes an MP gets is proportional to the number of seats they win. This system uses fewer, larger multimember constituencies and voters, again, number the candidates in order of preference.

  1. Do we have an effective parliamentary democracy?

    They can also amend laws and pass legislation. At the moment, the executive has a parliamentary majority so the government can't be defeated unless a lot of their MP's don't tow their party's line which is unlikely unless the law is contraversional.

  2. What is the main reason for the loss of faith and interest in our ...

    Change in turnout (%) 1945 75.5 - 1950 83.6 +8.1 1951 84.0 +0.4 1955 76.8 -7.2 1959 78.7 +1.9 1964 77.1 -1.6 1966 75.8 -1.3 1970 72.0 -3.8 1974 (Feb) 80.9 +8.9 1974 (Oct) 72.8 -8.1 1979 77.9 +5.1 1983 72.7 -5.2 1987 75.3 +2.6 1992 77.7 +2.4 1997 71.4 -6.2 2001 59.4 -12.0

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work