• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In what ways, if at all, might it be said that democracy ensures power by the people, for the people?

Extracts from this document...


SSCPL2080 Power and Decision-Making in Britain. In what ways, if at all, might it be said that democracy ensures power by the people, for the people? Rachael Fowler-251152 The word 'Democracy' derives from the ancient Greek words 'demos' and 'kratos' with a modern translation of rule by the people. Democracy as a word and concept is often contested in today's day and age as Bernard Crick states 'Democracy is perhaps the most promiscuous word in the world of public affairs' (Crick, 1962). Robertson also argues quite similarly stating that ' Democracy is the most valued and also the vaguest of political terms in the modern world.'(Robertson,1986). Due to the early Greek writings 5th century Athenians formed a 'direct' form of democracy where every citizen was given the right to vote. It was this form of democracy that inspired the democracy that we have come to adopt in Western Europe .But who truly exercises power in the UK is democracy that 'ensures power by the people, for the people' or does democracy ensure power to the elites? A pluralist view of democracy derives from a classic liberal way of thinking and is often called liberal democracy. ...read more.


Dahl proved his theory through participant observation of a small town (New Haven) where he selected a number of issues and the outcome. Dahl concluded that the decision making process was not an elitist but a pluralistic one with any major decision making process the leaders present were from a number of different groups promoting discussion and preventing a elitist rule. People had active participation through voting and although relationships between groups and group actors may be hierarchical there is evidence of competition. Critics of Dahl argue that not all groups are retranslated, there are some groups such as mentally ill or animals that are unable to represent themselves so they rely on others to do it for them. Not all people vote so it can't act as a check on the decision making process and with the continuous growth of apathy in UK this is a major problem. Also a group of competing decision making doesn't make the decision making process pluralistic it just makes it a competing group of elites. (Hill, 2005) Others believed that the decision making process never existed for the people as the choices we were allowed to make were already 'non -decisions'. ...read more.


However the reality or an elitist reality would be that although a select committee is democratic as it acts as a power check on government, government ultimately control the outcome as MP's which are controlled by party whips who will want an out come that can align with party policies. Quangos can also used as a bribery tool by whips to persuade MP's to the party's way of thinking. Pluralists believe that interest groups 'compete on a level playing field' and everyone has the chance to voice their opinions, however ' what a group achieves depends on it's resources and it's decibel rating' (Hill,2005). However elitists argue that this is not the case as government is more likely to use pressure groups that adhere to government policy. After examining pluralist democracy and elitism, it could be said that democracy does ensure power however it's not always by the people sometimes by an elite for the people. In the UK there exists a number of democratic institutions, however the question is are they controlled by a 'non-decision' process which as Hill (2005) can not be proved as we cannot study it. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Pressure Groups section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Pressure Groups essays

  1. Compare and Contrast Pluralist and Marxist Accounts of Power in the UK and US.

    logical to say that the more accurate information citizens have about the running of a country the better position they will be in to vote at elections. Dunleavy and O'Leary say: "Accurate and full information about politics is essential if [citizens] are to control politicians,"2 as if people know that a government is making decisions they disagree with.

  2. The wealthier and the closer the pressure group is to the government, the more ...

    However, wealth cannot be solely responsible for influencing the government. Without possessing similar ideological ideas to the residing government, it is highly unlikely that the pressure group will have any joy. The likes of Greenpeace and Father4Justice are prime examples of groups who rely heavily on direct action in order to influence the government due to their outsider status.

  1. What, in de Tocqueville's view, are the virtues and what are the vices of ...

    of the greatest advantages of democracy because it results in the movement towards democracy being accompanied by an equality of conditions for each citizen. The last major virtue of democracy that Tocqueville flags up is that it encourages a respect for law.

  2. This house believes that democracy is undesirable for a good society".

    Secondly, some people vote simply to follow others. For example, the Sun newspaper often changes its political allegiance. Often when it does, the party they support gains extra votes. Thirdly, people will vote with morals and so will vote on a particular issue, such as the war, rather than a party's whole manifesto.

  1. When The Arguments For and Against Have Been Taken Into Account, It Is Clear ...

    Insider groups are those are those with direct access to the decision makers they're trying to influence e.g. ministers/civil servants and outsider groups who don't. Pressure groups take numerous forms. They can be permanent or temporary, they can work together or be directly opposed etc.

  2. Politics - Democracy in the UK.

    Society is stable in this type of democracy as compromises are sought and the govt. acts on majority desires. There is evidence that this type of system works: westerns economy has flourished under this type of democracy. It provides certain amounts of freedom and equality i.e.

  1. Analyse whether Britain is a true democracy

    In addition to that there is the Totalitarian state. Totalitarianism and democracy are worlds apart in this typological differentiation. A totalitarian state has the rule and existence of only one party, and they don't take notice of elections and which does not recognize restrictions to its power in the form of a popular will.

  2. Pressure groups in a democracy.

    are a part of the direct decision making process this enables them to use direct methods in order to exert influence on the government. A good example of this is the Trades Union Congress. The Labour government meets in a conference with this group with all the high profile ministers

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work