• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In what ways was Soloman a successful king?

Extracts from this document...


In what ways was Soloman a successful king? John Drane came to the conclusion that 'Judged by the standards of world powers, Solomon was outstandingly successful, the greatest of all Israel's rulers. But judged by the moral and spiritual standards of the covenant, he was a miserable failure.' I agree with Drane in this statement because there were indeed many things Solomon did in his reign that were beneficial to the people and the country. However, for a man working for God, he does not seem to apply the covenant of Yahweh very much to the decisions he makes as king. Previously, during the reign of David, a new kingdom was beginning to be established. The small towns of the tribal confederacy were developing into larger cities throughout the land, noted for their economic and political importance. Israel was growing into a powerful nation, while David's powerful armies were defeating others around it. Therefore, when Solomon became king, he inherited an already large and stable kingdom in a secure position, with relatively large military forces and a reasonably content population. He also had the great example of his own father to follow, unlike Saul previously. However, his Father advises him to follow the word of God, which he does not take much heed of. He did many things within his reign that consolidated not only his own position, but also aided the position of Israel. Solomon was 'born to the purple' (Anderson), and never knew anything but the sheltered, extravagant life of a king's palace. However, it was this influence that made him want to demonstrate his power and wealth to the surrounding nations, therefore both building up the strength as well as the image of Israel. ...read more.


He also caused friction by apparently having no regard for the old tribal confederacy and putting up the tax borders geographically, deliberately splitting tribes up. Solomon however did collect a considerable amount of income from the taxes he imposed on the caravans that travelled through Israel from Arabia. Solomon's true genius lay in the realm of industry and trade. He was able to recognise the economic significance of his position astraddle the major trade routes. His commercial ventures were numerous and, since foreign trade was largely a royal monopoly, a source of great wealth to the state. Solomon's projects must have meant that thousands more were employed and although were taxed, would still probably been better off. Bright says that 'Israel enjoyed a security and material plenty such as she had never dreamed of before and was never to know again'. The living standards of people would have gone up considerably during Solomon's reign Solomon was particularly renowned for his building projects. The first major building he constructed was his palace on the hill of Zion, which, in total took thirteen years to build. It was mainly constructed by Tyrian craftsmen due to Solomon's alliance with Hiram, the King of Tyre, made previously by his Father David. He paid Hiram with 97000 gallons of olive oil and a considerable amount of grain. 80000 men worked in the quarries and 70000 were burden bearers, some of these were employed under conscription. The palace was often called the 'House of the forest of Lebanon' due to the amount of cedar trees taken for the building of Solomon's home. ...read more.


We are told in 1Kings4 that he had an extensive knowledge of beasts, birds, reptiles and fish, and wisdom in such topics was very highly regarded. The wisdom of Solomon was so infamous that the Queen of Sheba came to visit him and test him with hard questions to test his knowledge and wisdom. For a variety of reasons, there was ill feeling and resentment against the style of Solomon's rule. He established a strong central administration system, with tax districts under the control of an officer. Many people were angered, and felt that they were being led by an elite and privileged group, that went against the notion that all were equal before God. I agree with Drane when he says that 'the old ways were being eroded; instead of twelve tribes serving God, there were twelve districts serving the king'. In many ways Solomon was a successful king: he brought military strength, strong alliances and trading routes, great wealth and efficient central administration. All of these are imperative to a stable and successful kingdom. However Anderson argues that all of this glory and security was achieved through 'harsh measures of exploitation', which is evident through the evidence of taxation and forced labour Solomon inflicted on the country. Drane and Bright both agree that 'He had become like the kings of other nations in every bad sense', and he was 'the embodiment of all a king ought not to be'. Solomon's reign is a controversial one, and although he was successful in many ways, his greed and desire for absolute luxury brought out qualities that led to the disintegration of himself and Israel, particularly as a nation that followed Yahweh. Melanie Sawyer 13.6 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Middle east section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Middle east essays

  1. The Lebanon Civil War: Syria’s Role in Lebanon

    signed the Camp David accords in 1979 with Israel without Syrian approval. All this helps us to understand why Syria meant Lebanon as an important issue of its overall national security, either through its historic and geopolitical ties, or through the developments of the Palestinian cause.

  2. It seemed like an ordinary night. The soft whine of the wind echoed throughout ...

    The security room was very dimly lit. Two rusted lockers stood against the faded brown wall next to an old office. A pile of small monitors sat on the desk next to a miniature black lamp. Trevor sat down on one of the wooden chairs next the desk; he placed the newspaper and radio on its scratched surface.

  1. Armed Islamic Group [ Gia ]

    against mujahidins.The only convergence between GIA and AIS was over the question of attacking press.16 It is said that GIA was formed out of a bitter struggle for control of Algeria between Islamists and the country's authoritarian leadership. After winning independence from France in 1962, the country was governed by a socialist party called the National Liberation Front (FLN).

  2. Israel's Security Barrier

    A reason that will probably contribute to this are the Israeli settlements that have already been constructed beyond the "Green Line" and can therefore only be enclosed by the fence if it follows the "maximalist" or "pragmatic" route, Steinberg claims5.

  1. Palestinian refugee problem - source related study

    The source isn't very reliable in finding out about the attack on Deir Yassin, because its main aim is to make the Israeli's look bad. The source is from a pamphlet by the PLO, which means it was made for the public to read.

  2. The land of Israel, home of the holy land Jerusalem, has been around for ...

    capita newspaper readership being one of the highest in the world (Capri 63). Before Israel was established as an independent state in 1948, newspapers were often used as a tool to gain support for various political movements. Newspapers later began to share this responsibility with radio and television after independence had been established.

  1. Morocco is an incredibly diverse country, both historically and geographically.

    The first people to inhabit the area were the Berbers. It is tempting to call them natives, but most likely they are not indigineous. Most books say the Berbers appeared around the second millenium B.C but fail to mention where they came from.

  2. To what extent is the city of Jerusalem vital to the followers of three ...

    The Hill of Golgotha, is where Jesus was crucified, while, Gethsemane is believed to be where Jesus ascended to heaven. Although numerous pilgrims head annually to the church to visit and remember Jesus, there wasn't any historical proof of a connection between Christians and Jerusalem until the fourth century, which

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work