• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Invisible Primaries, USA.

Extracts from this document...


A. How important is the invisible primary in the presidential election campaign? The invisible primary is the period in between where candidates first announce their intentions to stand for presidency and when the first primary ballots are cast. The invisible primary generally consists of heavy fund raising (in excess of $100 million) as well as opinion polls, used by the media, to gauge who the front runners for the election are. Generally speaking, those who are able to raise the most money are going to appear as the strongest candidates and as a result, will be able to command greater donation power from those who are reserved until they have a clearer idea of who may win. The creation of informal and semi formal networks is crucial. Democrat, Hillary Clinton didn't announce her 2008 presidential intentions until after the 2006 mid-term elections, but her team had already begun to build a national fundraising committee to rival the Democratic National Committee, which was perceived to be unpredictable. The front loading of the primaries and caucuses means that candidates need to build up a significant amount of capital during the invisible primary 'process'. ...read more.


Michigan, Missouri and Mississippi, both the Republicans and Democrats allow any citizen of the state to vote, irrespective of their political affiliation, and so, achieving 'grass roots democracy'. This large scale participation has been seen to achieve a quasi-pure democracy since 1972 with the eradication of party hierarchical selection. The USA has always had a low level of voter turnout for general presidential elections. But, as exemplified with the Democrat primaries in the Clinton vs. Obama, younger voters in greater numbers are partaking in the political process. In New Hampshire (D), turnout accelerated to 52.5%. The primaries are there to give the 'backbenchers' in the party, the opportunity to make their opinion known in the process of selecting a presidential candidate. Since the wide scale development of the 24/7 media culture, the candidates in the primaries receive their share of public scrutiny, with the free media giving their view on the proceedings. Internal party debates are of paramount importance, and indeed, Obama was allowed, through the debates of the 2008 campaign, to rise ahead of Clinton. This draws parallels with the 2004 presidential campaign, where Kerry was seen to be the "most elect able" candidate. ...read more.


This is less favourable for the lesser known candidates, who lack the support base and resources of the more prominent candidates. The political calendar in the US is becoming more limited and the time frames are becoming more intense. To conclude, the disadvantages of the primaries far outweigh the benefits that they bring to American politics. They are just plainly ludicrous; there is massive apathy towards voting in the USA, and even in the more significant elections such as the Iowa caucus, there is a mere 6%. Even British local government elections poll more with turnout at about 35% on average. There is also the completely ignored factor that people from the Republicans may turn out and vote for the weakest Democratic candidate and vice versa. Front loading is also a very crucial factor as to why the primary elections are essentially, a complete shamble. Minor candidates are able to get ahead of the 'big wigs' and a complete lack of investigation, scrutiny and examination for such a significant public roll all contribute to the weakness of the primaries as a democratic electoral process in American politics. It is quite likely that the electoral process in Mugabe's Zimbabwe is more meaningful. The primaries are not democratic, and the process does not yield balanced and meaningful results. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Consider the view that the arguments for having an electoral college to elect the ...

    5 star(s)

    Moreover, the more extreme plan of directly electing the President by the popular vote could be adopted, however this comes with a myriad of problems. As mentioned the smaller states would lose out and swing states may end up with far more inconclusive results due to close races, similar in style to the Florida happenings of 2000.

  2. Consider whether the growth of primary elections in the Presidential nomination process has reduced ...

    Indeed, by the start of the 2008 Democrat convention it was still somewhat unclear over whom would be the party's Presidential candidate. Both Obama and Clinton had a high number of delegates and both had received support from previous candidates who had since dropped out.

  1. Consider whether the activities of pressure groups help or hinder the operation of a ...

    Professional lobbyists are an expensive resource; the wealthy groups that use them raise money through membership fees and Political Actions Committees (PAC's) which are used to gather donations which can then be used to pay for lobbyists and for donations to members of Congress.

  2. Explain the significance of the New Hampshire Primary and the Iowa Caucus in the ...

    George McGovern, the Democratic contender in the 1972 election, explained the significance of Iowa like this: "Iowa is terribly important. It's the first test in the nation, where we get any test at all". That test comes from 'average' voters.

  1. "What Factors contribute to a 'Failed' presidency? Illustrate your answer with examples from the ...

    This divide also looked unfavourable on Nixon as the 1970's were seen as time to 'get things done'. His eventual end of Presidential power was crippled with controversy due to the 'Watergate' Scandal, he lost the support of officials within The White House and the respect of public opinion soon followed.

  2. Consider the importance of invisible primaries in US Presidential elections.

    By the 31st December he had raised over 56 million dollars of the total 85 million by the Republican Party candidates. Finally Invisible primaries are important as they enable candidates to endorse party support and to gain momentum for their campaign before the gruelling campaign to come.

  1. How far do you agree the USA remains a global hegemony today?

    obtain their goals and were subsequently defeated by a counter force of nations. Throughout its early history, the United States used force, intimidation and a number of other methods in order to secure its power within North and South America.

  2. Evaluate the role of Televised debates in US presidential campaigns

    Kerry just before the debate, found the face a dead heat immediately after the debate. Viewing figures for the debates vary significantly from one election cycle to another. The all-time high point for debates viewership is still the 1980 debate between President Carter and his Republican challenger Reagan, which logged nearly 81 million viewers.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work