• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is a steady retreat from democracy a

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Is a steady retreat from democracy a necessary price to be paid for growing involvement in the European Union? Heywood (2002) defines the 'European idea' as the belief that Europe 'constitutes a single political community' with shared objectives and difficulties despite its historical, linguistic and cultural differences. In the 20th century the European community essentially concerned itself with defence, peace keeping, and economic progress partly in response to the devastation caused by the Second World War. However, the European Union is increasingly focusing on more domestic issues such as civil rights within the EU, environmental issues and social policy. This expansion of the EU was symbolically displayed with the introduction of the Euro, a single European Currency first introduced in the 1st January 1999 (dti, 2005). This has become a contentious issue within Westminster partly due to the economic risks and partly due to the perceived democratic deficit surrounding control of the Euro and all other European Union legislation. The debate over Britain's involvement also encapsulates whether there is actually any benefit in being part of a supranational organisation, which needs to be addressed in this essay. However, it is first essential to investigate whether the EU is undemocratic and whether Britain will become less democratic if it is fully subjected to a European constitution. This essay will then analyse whether this would be a worthwhile price to pay for involvement in the European Union. ...read more.

Middle

As the 'decision-making' (Heywood 2001) branch of the EU The Council of Ministers are responsible for initiating the process of turning the guidance of the EC into specific proposed policies and laws, however they are appointed rather than elected; held accountable through 'their own assemblies and governments' (Heywood 2001) and therefore not directly by the citizens of the EU. Pollack (2003) states that this is not the only legitimacy crisis within the EU as the method used to reach decisions is qualified majority voting which means not all ministers have to agree which creates the prospect of legislation 'that runs counter to the interests of member state governments and their electorates' (Pollack, 2003). However, qualified majority voting does speed up legislation and member states are able to opt out of some laws such as the introduction of a Single European Currency. The EU does appear to have a separation of powers which invites pluralist debate and constrains the possibility of domination. However, it would perhaps be in the interest of the electorate if more decisions originated from the European Parliament because of the legitimacy the elections give. However the current position of the EP has improved although Dykes (2003) states this as being an 'evolutionary process' he recognises the inter-institutional conference in 1992 as raising the issues of democracy, transparency and conciliation. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, in my opinion even with the constitution the EU is still flawed in its representation of the citizens of its member states. Poor electoral participation and the insufficient linkage between the electorate and the policy-making areas of the EU need to be addressed (Kitkat, 2004). The growing potency of the European Parliament clearly adds legitimacy to the EU; it is important that actions like these remain on the agenda, as it is possible discussions of democratic accountability will stagnate now the EU constitution has been signed. The European Union appears to have an elitist past which has conceded to change through the introduction of more member states and the expansion of the use of qualified majority voting which is more progressive that vetoing legislation (Bromley, 2001).. Evidently the political culture of the EU needs to change as much as its institutions and laws. I believe that a retreat from democracy is never an acceptable or necessary step for the benefit of being part of a supranational body. Particularly when so many improvements can be made, if the UK government feels the EU is undemocratic it is possible to highlight the democratic deficit that exists. It may be true that intergovernmental activity will be reduced in a more integrated Europe; however the loss of sovereign power is not necessarily the loss of democratic legitimacy as it is always possible for a connection between the electorate and state or supranational body. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. A clear explanation of key underpinning economic theories relevant to the EU.

    *Firms throughout the UK can seek mergers and commercial agreements with other European businesses. By co-operating with businesses whose strengths are complementary, organisations can derive benefits. Alternatively, take-overs might be the means by which businesses increase their scale to cope with the European market.

  2. Free essay

    Has British Politics been Europeanised

    that there are clearly two differing arguments to the debate, one that increasing EU intervention is acceptable so long as Britain benefits from it, however, the other states that it is important to maintain this clear division, otherwise is will grow to threaten the existing British political order.

  1. Is there a democratic deficit in the EU? What are its implications and how ...

    The Commission is a supranational body of civil servants which has been criticised for being undemocratic for many reasons. It is an unelected body, yet it contributes to policy and its actions have been described as 'steering the ship' i.e.

  2. The EU's CFSP and the Iraq Crisis: A Catalyst for Change?

    This split in opinion caused US Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld to make the distinction between "old Europe" and "new Europe", with the former being the anti-war countries of France, Germany, Belgium and Luxembourg, and the latter being the letter-signing countries who supported the US.

  1. Transformation of the U.S. Hegemony in Europe through NATO after the Cold War

    However, the U.S. enforced its role through the established institutions by adjusting them into the new conditions. Assuming the leadership of the Western world in the Cold War period, U.S. pursued the policy of transforming its hegemonic architecture, by making the redefinitions of the new security dimensions of Europe mostly through NATO.

  2. Economic and political integration between the member states of the European Union means that ...

    EU, World Trade Organisation & G8 EU is dealing with many parts of the world, actually with the whole world. Europe is seen as a great super power and this is because a lot of powerful countries have joined together as one.

  1. La mthode Monnet: What were the main driving forces behind the supranational integration of ...

    The Schuman Plan could be seen as a way of establishing a degree of control over Germany while they were relatively weak. Their immediate post-war strategy was to contain and suppress Germany: both the public and politicians of France were in strong opposition to German recovery so this suggestion is certainly feasible.

  2. To What Extent Does the EU Display a 'Democratic Deficit'?

    The use of PR systems raises the further problem of manifestos and mandates. Because one party on its own does not have a majority, it is difficult to decide which policies from which elected parties should be carried through by the European Parliament.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work