• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is Iraq ready for democracy??

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Is Iraq ready for democracy?? Systems based on guaranteed freedoms, the rule of law, and peaceful electoral transitions are obviously desirable for all. Today's debate over bringing democracy to the Muslim Middle East often centers on whether the region is "ready for democracy" (Newsom). A number of problems the US has to face during transferring democratic essentials seems to just increase: ongoing fights in whole Iraq, a lack of governmental structure, a shortage of charismatic political figures, who would be acceptable by American side, and finally the lack of cultural experience in democratic governing. Giving the power over to Iraqis must be done, but the process has to be careful and proceeded by serious soul-searching of the case ("Trudny"). Democratic regimes in the region would face populations feeling humiliated by the West and vulnerable to politicians who would seek to exploit the deep-seated resentments relating to Israel; ethnic and religious divisions; and the intrusion of foreign, particularly Western influence. ...read more.

Middle

Each will be followed closely in Washington. If new policies are unacceptable, strong demands will be made, either for a forceful removal of the offending government or for sanctions. It may not be enough for proponents of diplomacy to point to the risks of setting aside an elected government or to urge dialogue with the new authorities, arguing that the experience of power often modifies the most radical of governments. The US commitment to the results of democracy will be sorely tested. The temporary government in Iraq struggles with a lot of difficulties. The first is the disappearance of all previous government structures - following the war there was chaos within these, like: army, police, and all Baas party councils, even officials in national departments and villages' leaders. Although action was necessary, experts warned that the situation in Iraq wouldn't be like in Germany (where after Hitler's collapse a government was quickly re-build) ...read more.

Conclusion

The Sunnites, who used to wield authority, are now just a small (15% of population) minority and are afraid of losing power to a major group - the Shiite. Third group - the Kurd don't want to lose their autonomy. The New York Times from 19th March 2004 expressed anxiety that, while in Iraq there is no culture of confidence and compromise, any Iraqi election is going to give the power to Shiites, limit Sunnites influence and will leave Kurds, who desire to separate their part of Iraq, to be ruled by people they have no trust ("Trudny") The process of transferring the power in Iraq to its citizens will be a long, difficult task. It is going to cost next millions of dollars and require the presence of international troops for next few years; however, it is job which must be done properly to provide peace in the Middle East and real end of terrorism in Iraq, hopefully in whole world. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Does democracy bring peace?

    Furthermore in democracies there are internal institutional constraints preventing leaders from rushing into hasty military action. Prior to attacking a foreign country, almost all democratic leaders would have to seek support from the legislature and because of regular elections also ensure they had sufficient public support.

  2. Communism VS Democracy

    In many democracies, such as the United States, both the executive head of government and the legislature are elected. In typical constitutional monarchies such as Great Britain and Norway, only the legislators are elected, and from their ranks a cabinet and a prime minister are chosen.

  1. Evolution of Democracy and the Athenian Constitution

    led the Shore. His first set himself up as tyrant through appealing to and inciting the people (peasants). As documented in Plutarch(p: 73) and Aristotle (p: 157) he wounded himself accusing his opponents for the act and so secured by popular consent a bodyguard of fifty club bearers for himself.

  2. The Foreign Policy of an Islamic Presidential Democracy.

    Furthermore, the Preamble defines Algeria as being "a land of Islam, an integral part of the Great Maghreb, an Arab land, a Mediterranean and African country". The affirmation is not far from the truth, if one is to take into consideration the facts and figures readily available on the CIA World Factbook.

  1. Is consociational democracy democratic?

    In all democracies power is necessarily divided to some extents between the central and non-central governments in order to avoid a concentration of power25. The 'consociational' school, inspired by the writings of Tocqueville, sees decentralisation of power as the essence of democratic government26.

  2. Indonesia: Transition and Prospects for Democracy

    Wahid was impeached in 2001 due to suspicions of corruption, and was replaced by his vice-president Megawati. Megawati's three-year presidency was stable, but she did not address many problems Indonesia was facing, such as poverty and unemployment which were aggrieved by the 1997-8 crisis.

  1. Can a plausible case be made for participatory democracy under modern conditions?

    presents in The Social Contract, we notice in fact that Rousseau himself claimed that such a system could occur in practice only in 'small, peasant' communities and, hence, he himself appears to have realised the impracticalities of a fully participatory system on a large scale.

  2. Russia's Political Party System as an Obstacle to Democratization

    were better concentrated on the party-based proportional representation contests, and candidates learned that party backing is not the key to victory in single-member district races. There are three related factors that substantially mitigate against any change in this situation. First is that the rules governing nomination as a candidate deemphasize the role of parties.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work