• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is it true to say that the UK now features Prime Ministerial rather than Cabinet Government?'

Extracts from this document...


'Is it true to say that the UK now features Prime Ministerial rather than Cabinet Government?' In order to answer this question we must look at the leading styles of the past Prime Ministers, and evaluate their individual techniques for running the government, and compare them to one another. The first person that we shall look at is Margaret Thatcher, the longest serving post-war Prime Minister who ran her government and lead the country for 11 straight years. Margaret Thatcher, or the Iron lady as she has since been labelled, was a very strong and positive leader, notoriously making decisions with little or no help from her Cabinet and colleagues. Her style of leadership was very much Prime Ministerial and worked very well for most of her time in power as you can tell for the amount of time that she was kept in, however it was also to be her downfall, and as she became stronger and stronger towards the end, possibly with a sense of invincibility and faith in her own decisions, both the country, and her cabinet grew more and more dis-gruntled with her over-powering forcefulness, and a string of unpopular decisions led to her demise. 1990 brought her the realisation of how people in general viewed her, after bringing each member of her cabinet into her office one by one and asking them individually whether they thought that she could stay in power. ...read more.


For the first term that he was in power, the return to the traditional method seemed like a welcome change from the forceful and dominant manner in which Thatcher had led, however it was his lack of conviction and dominance which was his downfall, and most argue that this was the main factor which led to his election defeat in 1997, however there were also other reasons and collectively his reign of power diminished and was subsequently handed over to Tony Blair with his New Labour Party. As we come to the end of Tony Blair's premiership, we can see the similarities in the way that he has run the government for the past 10 years, to that of both John Major, and Margaret Thatcher respectively. At first Blair seemed to collaborate the strengths of both of his predecessors, by keeping a strong cabinet of ministers with regular meetings and debates over policy decisions, however he also showed that he was strong enough to stand by the manifesto that had got him into power in the first place, and with the help of his seemingly overwhelming majority of 179, he was able to push most of his legislative programme through parliament in the first year alone. At the beginning of Blair's Premiership a lot of evidence can be found to support the theory that a more traditional Cabinet and leading Chief Executive Prime Minister partnership ...read more.


his premiership and the decisions and policies that were set we find a much more balanced and traditional style, although in my opinion it was never a Cabinet Government. After establishing that Blair has run his Government in a Prime Ministerial style, and even more prominently in the latter years with his introduction and use of more personal/special advisors, or Kitchen Cabinet as it has been dubbed, the question that presents itself is; what is the problem with a Prime Ministerial Government? The main argument is that the advisors that Blair filled number 10 with are not necessarily members of parliament, meaning they are helping the Prime Minister with decisions that will affect the whole country, when they haven't been elected by the people themselves. However it can be argued that the ministers who have been elected aren't as experienced or as qualified in the relevant fields as those that the Prime Minister can choose personally. It is also worth noting that the decisions made by the Prime Minister and his 'Kitchen Cabinet' will also have to be passed through Parliament, and should the policies completely lose touch with reality and start becoming absurd, the government will still have a certain amount of control with it's powers of restraint, and it's also worth taking into account that a Prime Minister can still be virtually forced out by his/her Cabinet, as we saw with John Major. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Leadership styles

    3 star(s)

    * Formal systems of discipline are in place. * Team members do exactly what the manager tells them to do and have no authority. * The team is fully accountable for its actions and will be sanctioned for failure. * The team might not have the resources or capability to carry out a task.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Do We Have a Cabinet Government or Prime Ministerial Government?

    3 star(s)

    * The expansion and increased status of the Prime Minister's office. * The impact of British membership of the EU on top decision-making has strengthened the prime minister's hand and weakened Cabinet. * The prime minister's position at the centre of the Cabinet committee system enhances his or her power.

  1. Does the UK have a Prime Ministerial government?

    Another way there has been a move from cabinet government is that the prime minister has become able to push their own policy forward with little or no support from their parties for example Thatcher pushed through the poll tax bill even though the party was more or less united in opposition to the idea.

  2. Arguments that the British Prime Minister is an elective dictator are arrant nonsense. The ...

    Thus central power is taken away from the hands of the Prime Minister. It is considered that by keeping these three branches separate, the liberty of citizens will be protected.

  1. Does Britain have a Prime Ministerial or Cabinet Government?

    policies and people they effectively have control over MPs, which makes them very powerful. Another factor that gives the Prime Minister power is the growth of the civil service. It has become such a large organisation that it can no longer be controlled by the Cabinet.

  2. priministers power

    * Thatcher and Blair as Presidential figures - Margaret Thatcher's premiership has been seen by some commentators as validating the prime ministerial power thesis . Tony Blair has been seen as going even further than Mrs Thatcher in centralising power in his own hands.

  1. Evaluate the above statement and consider the extent to which you think it is ...

    such a question is by practical experimentation, and would probably achieve the net result of piling one constitutional crisis atop another, and translating a crisis into a disaster. The single greatest argument against describing the British Prime Minister as an elective dictator is the fact that general elections are still statutorily held at least every five years.

  2. Is the UK Prime Minister now effectively a president?

    The coalition government proves that the presidential-style government is not inevitable for David Cameron. Furthermore, Prime minsters are unable to become presidents due to the circumstance they are under which effect the amount that they can exercise their powers. This is illustrated during Browns premiership because of the economic crisis

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work