• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is Liberalism compatible with democracy?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Is Liberalism compatible with democracy? Liberalism is a political view that seeks to foster the development and well-being of the individual. Liberals regard the individual as a rational creature who can use his or her intelligence to overcome human and natural obstacles to a good life for all without resorting to violence against the established order. Liberalism is more concerned with process, with the method of solving problems, than with a specific programme. In the 18th and 19th Centuries, Liberalism emphasised the full development of the individual, free from the restraints of government. In the 20th Century, Liberalism has seen a change of direction in that it looks to government as a means of correcting the abuses and shortcomings of society through the use of positive programmes of action. Today's Liberals would see the government as a positive force in issues involving, for example, civil rights when the government can use its authority and power to change society for the good so that individuals can experience a positive benefit to their lives brought about by government action. In this sense, modern Liberals do not see the government necessarily as a major threat to individual freedom. ...read more.

Middle

In other words, there is nothing about democracy per se that guarantees freedom rather than a tyranny of the masses. The coinage Liberal democracy suggests a more harmonious marriage between the two principles than actually exists. Liberals strive after the replacement of absolutism by limited government; a government by consent. The idea of consent suggests a democracy. At the same time, the founders of the first Liberal democracies feared mob rule, and so they built into the constitutions of Liberal democracies checks and balances intended to limit the power of government by dividing those powers among several branches. For Liberals, democracy is not an end in itself, but an essential means to secure Liberty, individuality and diversity. Liberals have expressed reservations about democracy, not just because of the 'tyranny of the masses' but also because of the make-up of the majority in modern societies. J.S. Mill was very precise when he stated that political wisdom is not equally distributed, and that it is largely related to education. The uneducated are more liable to act according to narrow class interests, whereas the educated are able to use their wisdom and experience for the good of others. ...read more.

Conclusion

The liberal element in liberal Democracy is the belief in limited government, the idea that the individual should enjoy some protection from the subjective action of public officials. The democratic element represents the fact that the government should be accountable to the people which it represents. Liberal Democracy tries to restrict or regulate government intervention in political, economic and moral matters affecting the population. Liberal Democracy also tries to increase the scope for religious, political and intellectual freedom of citizens. It questions the demands made by vested interest groups seeking special privileges. Liberal Democracy tries to develop a society open to talent and which rewards citizens on merit, rather than on rank, privilege or status. Possibly the most important factor is that it tries to maximise the well-being of all or most citizens. Liberalism is compatible with democracy as long as democracy does not fall into a 'tyranny of the masses' or a 'rule by the mob' society in which some minority needs are not cared for. A suitable compromise is Liberal democracy, which helps people gain the individual freedom they wish to have so that they can pursue their self-interest, and at the same time makes sure that government does not become too powerful, because of all the checks and balances which have been put into place. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Does democracy bring peace?

    Commercial pacifists argue that open market societies are deeply against war. While they accept that democracy contributes to peace, they believe the more important reason for pacifism within and amongst democracies was commerce. Contrary to the argument of "democratic peace" theorists, commercial pacifists contend that democracies in the past have

  2. Notes on John Stuart Mill's On Liberty

    but each also might have some very bad effects, in each case we simply cannot tell which will happen. Thus, in neither case should we take the risk. [See part 9,b below for further explanation] 7) What constitutes harm? a)

  1. How and why does Locke explain the creation, value and protection of property?

    How can Locke's universally known theory be applied to each person? The answer to this question is that Locke's theory of property can not incorporate each person into it's meaning. The information that Locke wrote applied to the sixteenth century.

  2. Russia's Political Party System as an Obstacle to Democratization

    Union are all rated either "Partly Free" or "Not Free" (including Moldova, although it is the closest of these states to being rated "Free"). Of the latter group of states, all except Moldova use single-member district elections to elect some or all of their legislatures.

  1. Is the practice of humanitarian intervention compatible with an international system that is based ...

    Finally intervention was taken after 3 and a half years of this murderous regime in December 1979. However, Vietnam rejected the justification of this intervention basing on humanitarian grounds, instead, they claimed that they acted according to Article 51 of the UN chapter where stated all states are entitled the right to act in self defence (Kiernan, 2002).

  2. Indonesia: Transition and Prospects for Democracy

    They supported the New Order, but sometimes made liberal concessions in hopes of holding on to power; they adopt the rhetoric and some of the outer trappings of democracy (North et al., 1998), such as elections. Elections were held every five years only to "lend an aura of democratic legitimacy" (Neher & Marlay, 1995)

  1. Why 19th Century Liberals Feared Democracy

    a culture of dull conformism, where people according to Mill become transformed into mere ?industrious sheep? as they defer to the judgments of the majority based on the unfounded assumption that the majority is always right. Consequently democracy gradually strangles originality and individuality.

  2. Participation is the essence of democracy Discuss

    is no point to vote because getting out of the red and into the black is the highest priority on the peoples mind. If there is no change then, it can be seen as a wait vote. Party participation is the absolute importance for a democracy to be in affect

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work