• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is Liberalism compatible with democracy?

Extracts from this document...


Is Liberalism compatible with democracy? Liberalism is a political view that seeks to foster the development and well-being of the individual. Liberals regard the individual as a rational creature who can use his or her intelligence to overcome human and natural obstacles to a good life for all without resorting to violence against the established order. Liberalism is more concerned with process, with the method of solving problems, than with a specific programme. In the 18th and 19th Centuries, Liberalism emphasised the full development of the individual, free from the restraints of government. In the 20th Century, Liberalism has seen a change of direction in that it looks to government as a means of correcting the abuses and shortcomings of society through the use of positive programmes of action. Today's Liberals would see the government as a positive force in issues involving, for example, civil rights when the government can use its authority and power to change society for the good so that individuals can experience a positive benefit to their lives brought about by government action. In this sense, modern Liberals do not see the government necessarily as a major threat to individual freedom. ...read more.


In other words, there is nothing about democracy per se that guarantees freedom rather than a tyranny of the masses. The coinage Liberal democracy suggests a more harmonious marriage between the two principles than actually exists. Liberals strive after the replacement of absolutism by limited government; a government by consent. The idea of consent suggests a democracy. At the same time, the founders of the first Liberal democracies feared mob rule, and so they built into the constitutions of Liberal democracies checks and balances intended to limit the power of government by dividing those powers among several branches. For Liberals, democracy is not an end in itself, but an essential means to secure Liberty, individuality and diversity. Liberals have expressed reservations about democracy, not just because of the 'tyranny of the masses' but also because of the make-up of the majority in modern societies. J.S. Mill was very precise when he stated that political wisdom is not equally distributed, and that it is largely related to education. The uneducated are more liable to act according to narrow class interests, whereas the educated are able to use their wisdom and experience for the good of others. ...read more.


The liberal element in liberal Democracy is the belief in limited government, the idea that the individual should enjoy some protection from the subjective action of public officials. The democratic element represents the fact that the government should be accountable to the people which it represents. Liberal Democracy tries to restrict or regulate government intervention in political, economic and moral matters affecting the population. Liberal Democracy also tries to increase the scope for religious, political and intellectual freedom of citizens. It questions the demands made by vested interest groups seeking special privileges. Liberal Democracy tries to develop a society open to talent and which rewards citizens on merit, rather than on rank, privilege or status. Possibly the most important factor is that it tries to maximise the well-being of all or most citizens. Liberalism is compatible with democracy as long as democracy does not fall into a 'tyranny of the masses' or a 'rule by the mob' society in which some minority needs are not cared for. A suitable compromise is Liberal democracy, which helps people gain the individual freedom they wish to have so that they can pursue their self-interest, and at the same time makes sure that government does not become too powerful, because of all the checks and balances which have been put into place. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Does democracy bring peace?

    Commercial pacifists argue that open market societies are deeply against war. While they accept that democracy contributes to peace, they believe the more important reason for pacifism within and amongst democracies was commerce. Contrary to the argument of "democratic peace" theorists, commercial pacifists contend that democracies in the past have

  2. Notes on John Stuart Mill's On Liberty

    There are going to be a lot of hard cases concerning this (e.g., your offense at the nudity of me on the beach, or your financial harm when I move in next door and cut down all the trees on my property and use my back yard as a smelly compost heap).

  1. Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons

    This model leaves little room for pluralist inputs and local diversity. Pluralist democracies and federal systems thrive (most of the time) on their multicultural dimensions. Rather than eliminate diversity, it is honored and encouraged. In the corporate world, much of what is claimed about decentralization, 'planning from the bottom up', and individual empowerment often is spurious.

  2. How and why does Locke explain the creation, value and protection of property?

    How can Locke's universally known theory be applied to each person? The answer to this question is that Locke's theory of property can not incorporate each person into it's meaning. The information that Locke wrote applied to the sixteenth century.

  1. Communism VS Democracy

    It was succeeded, after a lengthy period of political upheaval, by the Bolshevik faction of Russian Marxism-later known as the Communist Party-led by Lenin (Foreman 123). From its inception, Communist rule in the Soviet Union faced a variety of problems.

  2. Evolution of Democracy and the Athenian Constitution

    invested them with dignity. Though power was still in the hands of the aristocracy as the thetes were not eligible for office there was a balance between the poor and the rich in that only the Areopagus could propose

  1. The study of international or rather global politics, seeks to provide an account of ...

    monarchy, aristocracy or democracy. By doing so, Bodin highlights that the way in which power is executed is dependent on the form of government but regardless of form the government is still a sovereign. As he explains, "Sovereignty is that absolute and perpetual power vested in a commonwealth...I have described it as perpetual because

  2. Do you agree with Churchill's statement that "democracy is the worst form of government ...

    What is the purpose of this essay? A. To show the understanding of Democracy. B. Argue or Agree with Winston Churchill?s assertion. What is the Arguments? [Neutral] A. Democracy is not perfect, however we can?t say dictatorship will bring more advantages.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work