• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is the Conservative Party today still genuinely conservative?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Is the Conservative Party today still genuinely 'conservative'? David Cameron has introduced much reform into the Conservative Party since his ascension into power of the Conservative Party, in December 2005. He has, in many ways, modernised the Party, and has introduced measures that are so wide reaching, that his brand of Conservatism has a name, Social Conservatism. Social Conservatism, introduced by Cameron, differs from conventional, traditional conservatism in many ways. Largely, economic policies have remained the same, and the Conservatives are still regarded as 'business-friendly'. However, although low tax is important, and Cameron realises this, Social Conservatives argue that tax can merely be lowered as long as public services are not affected detrimentally. Therefore, one can see, from merely one example that Social Conservatism has brought the Party to the left slightly. However, his supporters argue that conservatism has always taken the middle ground, and hence, he is doing the right thing by changing Conservative economic policies slightly. ...read more.

Middle

This is true, for a socialist can create a party and call themselves the Conservative Party, yet they would not have 'conservative' ideals. Again, traditional conservatism espouses harsher penalties on criminals, harsher immigration laws, and generally has a more pessimistic outlook towards human nature than most other ideologies. Social Conservatism, however, suggests that humans are generally good, and this is reflected within their social policies. Social Conservatism suggests that the perpetrators of crime should not be punished as severely as traditional conservative values would suggest, but should be rehabilitated and there should be a greater understanding of why people commit crime. This is a liberal view, if any, and since liberalism takes a positive view of human nature as the norm, one can logically link this back, to Social Conservatism. Essentially, this shift to the left, and this escape from traditional Tory values can be seen in a real world example, the (traditional) Conservative member shift to more right-wing parties, such as the British National Party. ...read more.

Conclusion

This is merely logic. However, because Social Conservatism is not necessarily conservative, this does not mean that every member in the Party is a Social Conservative. Therefore, as long as there remains a significant group, representing traditional conservative values within the Party, one could suggest that a portion of the Party is conservative. However, one must be careful, and realise that the whims of the current leadership do not necessarily reflect the values of all members. Hence, one cannot simply say that the Conservative Party is not conservative, if the leadership is not, because there are significant proportions of membership who still uphold Tory values. Without these members however, one could suggest that the Conservatives are no longer 'conservative'. In brief then, Social Conservatism is not 'conservative' for it sways too far to the left for it to represent traditional conservatism. Therefore, the leadership, and Cameron, are not 'conservative' yet one cannot apply that to all members of the Party, and hence, the Conservative Party are not wholly 'conservative' but there are a significant number of Tories who are 'conservative'. 1 http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2002/oct/08/uk.conservatives2002 2 http://www.stopthebnp.org.uk/index.php?location=news&art=536 3 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Cameron ?? ?? ?? ?? Lloyd Riley 11W 6th October 2008 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Is the 'New Right' a departure from or a continuation of traditional British Conservatism?

    Again, it ushered the Party further in a new direction - away from its previous acceptance of such arrangements and the general consensus which had surrounded the essential matters of politics since the War. The Party examined itself and the national condition, remodelling itself accordingly.

  2. How far did Conservative governments conform to traditional conservatism between 1945 and 1990?

    Britain became more focused on Burke's ideas of economic freedom and reducing taxes while also continuing to be very Pro-Capitalist, particularly because of Communism spreading from the USSR. The Conservative government of the 1950s also encouraged home-ownership, with over 300,000 houses being built a year.

  1. In defining whether Thatcherism was different from conservatism we must first understand which form ...

    This was very much alien to the conservative approach of centralisation and control. Second was consumer choice was good which emotively hit home with much appeal and joined the third principle of freedom of contract. These were all clearly liberalist in there approach.

  2. Russia's Political Party System as an Obstacle to Democratization

    In the words of one Russian observer at the time: "Russian politics is increasingly becoming restricted to private, top-level intrigues. One can talk of retrogression: Before, a proto- (or quasi) multiparty system ensured a semblance of feedback between the authorities and society and guaranteed a certain transparency of political life,

  1. Is the labour party a socialist party.

    The party has shifted gradually during this period away from socialist ideas in general, despite holding a few of the principles of socialism. The Labour party still claim that they are a 'democratic socialist party', which believes that 'by the strength of our common endeavour we achieve more than we achieve alone'.

  2. Wilted Socialist Rose?: Changing fortunes of the French Socialist Party

    the lack of a clear ideology, resulting in membership loss and electoral decline (Machin & Wright 1977). The SFIO had long been unpopular because of the lack of a clear ideology. The appearance of several radical Socialist parties further left made the SFIO more of a centre party instead (Cobban 1948).

  1. Survival of the fittest or the adaptation of conservative and liberal states

    The role that the government has in either political theory is directly related to how these doctrines perceive religion, tradition, the individual, and the source of authority. Scruton argues against the liberal idea of a government legitimized by a social contract.

  2. Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons

    It does mean, however, that organizational change is extraordinarily difficult to carry off, given the magnitude of inertial forces (Kaufman 1981). The budget process and goal displacement in the public/political sphere are additional factors that impinge on an orientation to action.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work