• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is the Conservative Party today still genuinely conservative?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Is the Conservative Party today still genuinely 'conservative'? David Cameron has introduced much reform into the Conservative Party since his ascension into power of the Conservative Party, in December 2005. He has, in many ways, modernised the Party, and has introduced measures that are so wide reaching, that his brand of Conservatism has a name, Social Conservatism. Social Conservatism, introduced by Cameron, differs from conventional, traditional conservatism in many ways. Largely, economic policies have remained the same, and the Conservatives are still regarded as 'business-friendly'. However, although low tax is important, and Cameron realises this, Social Conservatives argue that tax can merely be lowered as long as public services are not affected detrimentally. Therefore, one can see, from merely one example that Social Conservatism has brought the Party to the left slightly. However, his supporters argue that conservatism has always taken the middle ground, and hence, he is doing the right thing by changing Conservative economic policies slightly. ...read more.

Middle

This is true, for a socialist can create a party and call themselves the Conservative Party, yet they would not have 'conservative' ideals. Again, traditional conservatism espouses harsher penalties on criminals, harsher immigration laws, and generally has a more pessimistic outlook towards human nature than most other ideologies. Social Conservatism, however, suggests that humans are generally good, and this is reflected within their social policies. Social Conservatism suggests that the perpetrators of crime should not be punished as severely as traditional conservative values would suggest, but should be rehabilitated and there should be a greater understanding of why people commit crime. This is a liberal view, if any, and since liberalism takes a positive view of human nature as the norm, one can logically link this back, to Social Conservatism. Essentially, this shift to the left, and this escape from traditional Tory values can be seen in a real world example, the (traditional) Conservative member shift to more right-wing parties, such as the British National Party. ...read more.

Conclusion

This is merely logic. However, because Social Conservatism is not necessarily conservative, this does not mean that every member in the Party is a Social Conservative. Therefore, as long as there remains a significant group, representing traditional conservative values within the Party, one could suggest that a portion of the Party is conservative. However, one must be careful, and realise that the whims of the current leadership do not necessarily reflect the values of all members. Hence, one cannot simply say that the Conservative Party is not conservative, if the leadership is not, because there are significant proportions of membership who still uphold Tory values. Without these members however, one could suggest that the Conservatives are no longer 'conservative'. In brief then, Social Conservatism is not 'conservative' for it sways too far to the left for it to represent traditional conservatism. Therefore, the leadership, and Cameron, are not 'conservative' yet one cannot apply that to all members of the Party, and hence, the Conservative Party are not wholly 'conservative' but there are a significant number of Tories who are 'conservative'. 1 http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2002/oct/08/uk.conservatives2002 2 http://www.stopthebnp.org.uk/index.php?location=news&art=536 3 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Cameron ?? ?? ?? ?? Lloyd Riley 11W 6th October 2008 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Is the 'New Right' a departure from or a continuation of traditional British Conservatism?

    Again, it ushered the Party further in a new direction - away from its previous acceptance of such arrangements and the general consensus which had surrounded the essential matters of politics since the War. The Party examined itself and the national condition, remodelling itself accordingly.

  2. How far did Conservative governments conform to traditional conservatism between 1945 and 1990?

    Britain became more focused on Burke's ideas of economic freedom and reducing taxes while also continuing to be very Pro-Capitalist, particularly because of Communism spreading from the USSR. The Conservative government of the 1950s also encouraged home-ownership, with over 300,000 houses being built a year.

  1. Russia's Political Party System as an Obstacle to Democratization

    by Rybkin-which were intended to represent the pro-Yeltsin forces and the loyal opposition respectively. The expectation was that the more moderate parties from both directions would gravitate toward these two blocs, strengthening the political center and weakening the extremist parties, such as the LDPR, that had done very well in 1993 (gaining the second most number of seats).

  2. In defining whether Thatcherism was different from conservatism we must first understand which form ...

    Conservatism had no grand designs to change the world but a simple pragmatic view of what is best. Conservatism did survive, perhaps because of strong party unity and a deference to those in authority ie: party leaders, but it was radically shaken up when Mrs.

  1. Is the labour party a socialist party.

    The party claims that its policy is to develop a society 'where we live together, freely, in a spirit of solidarity, tolerance and respect and a society where the rights we enjoy reflect the duties we owe'. This policy encourages capitalism a lot more than socialism does.

  2. Wilted Socialist Rose?: Changing fortunes of the French Socialist Party

    and rival parties like the young and creative United Socialist Party (PSU) stole members away from the SFIO. Furthermore, the SFIO's presidential candidate Gaston Defferre barely garnered 5% of the votes in the 1969 elections. The lack of clear ideology and political competition resulted in a loss of membership and electoral support, inducing the emergence of the new PS.

  1. Survival of the fittest or the adaptation of conservative and liberal states

    In his theory the social contract could not exist with out a pre-existing social order, where contractual sides could commit (Scruton: 20). In his view a state's authority emanates from the given fact that "...we exercise it understand it and submit to it."

  2. Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons

    [These self-regarding goals] distort policy orientations and block institutional reforms by making individual self interest or collective partisan advantage the focus of attention and the criterion of action' (p. 337). Mayhew (1974) found that the best explanation for the action orientation of members of Congress is the strength of each member's the desire be reelected.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work