• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is the 'New Right' a departure from or a continuation of traditional British Conservatism?

Extracts from this document...


Is the 'New Right' a departure from or a continuation of traditional British Conservatism? The New Right, as it is called, has had a phenomenal impact in Britain and the United States since 1979. Both its successes and failures have led to an intense ongoing debate, especially within the British Conservative Party, as to what extent the New Right represents a departure or continuance of, what some perceive as, traditional Conservatism. The long and rich past of the Party has made the citation of a particular period of its history, as being either a source or illustration of traditional Conservatism, very difficult indeed. Nonetheless, certain tenants transcend the breadth of its history to form the criteria by which the New Right can be judged. Conservatism is, first and foremost, composed of many conflicting strands of thought. It does not stand as a monolithic ideology offering an unalterable set of prescriptions which configure to some preconceived, and as yet, unrealised ideal of society. It is not surprising then that "there are many conservatives who would deny the attribution of ideology to their beliefs."1 British Conservatism is, therefore, more accurately, characterised by the prevailing strand or grouping at any given time. ...read more.


This is a very distinctive Conservative tradition. The New Right did, however, abandon any notions of paternalism and instead emphasised the importance of economics in emancipating the individual. Economics was above politics. This brought the New Right into conflict with the One Nationists who felt, like P. Norton and A. Aughey in 1981, that the "disposition towards economic policy may entail the disseveration of the concept of One Nation."3 The emphasis on free markets, deregulation and an non-interfering state has a strong tradition in Conservatism which stretches back to the publication of Adam Smith's The Wealth of Nations. It was, however, a departure from post-war Conservatism. There had always been mixed and opposing views within Conservatism on the merits of capitalism. Lord Hailsham had criticised capitalism as "an ungodly and rapacious scramble for ill-gotten gains" whereas Burke before him regarded "the laws of commerce" as being "the laws of nature, and consequently the laws of God."4 In this respect the New Right had roots within the longer history of Conservatism. The ferocity with which it economic policies were pursued, in the face of stiff opposition, represented something of a departure in the broad consensus of post-war Britain. ...read more.


Sir Robert Peel, back in 1846, had split the entire party due to his refusal to compromise over protectionism for the land-owning classes. By contrast, the Party managed to hold together under the leadership of Thatcher for ten years and even went on to win a further Election in 1992. A simple majority of MP's had supported Thatcher in the internal ballot of 1989. There must have been common ground under the New Right for all this to have been achieved. The New Right saw themselves as an ascendant strand of traditional Conservatism and did not regard themselves as a complete departure. "Between lasting values and changing circumstances there must be a constant dialogue" Thatcher had said in 1977. It was or is its uncharacteristic ideologicalism which obfuscates the issue of continuity making it seem like a departure. It refused compromise and objected to any tempering of what it thought the best way to proceed. The New Right was not really new because it related to many aspects of Conservatism which had gone before: "the New Right is in fact a renewed Right." It prized freedom, was thrift, classless, populist, nationalistic or patriotic and authoritarian to name but a few. Neither its contradictions or an erroneous view of traditional conservatism should allow it to be labelled a wholesale departure from traditional Conservatism, it is not. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    How Similar was Thatcherism To Traditional Conservatism?

    4 star(s)

    Therefore initially before ay analysis of measures taken it can argues it is an example on conservative pragmatism, which is flexible to change and to push out the influence of left-wing policies. It has been argued though that the process of disengagement does contradict traditional conservatism in the idea of

  2. To what extent is there continuity between traditional Conservatism and the New Right? (45 ...

    Conservatives on the whole see negative freedom as a licence for anarchy, especially as the context of the development of the New Right (the age of individualism) could lead to profound global social unrest if society was not kept in check.

  1. Why and to what extent have conservatives supported tradition?

    The word 'radical' only applies if you consider a very limited timeframe, however. The commitment to economic individualism likely came from the fact that, until recently, richer classes had to contribute very little tax. This neo-Conservative principle led to significant change: it has been applied more or less egalitarianly, reducing

  2. To what extent can Conservatism be considered an ideology?

    They believe people are born unequal as people are born with different skills and talent. With this said there must be leaders and there must be followers. This moves society from being an aristocracy to meritocracy. Furthermore, Conservatives will argue that authority should be the epicentre for everything.

  1. To what extent is there continuity between traditional Conservatism and the New Right?

    This society is one which is expected to evolve and learn, and opposes the liberal notion of a gessellschaft, in which negative freedom, the right to do what you want as long as it doesn't impose on the rights of others, reigns supreme.

  2. How Similar was Thatcherism To Traditional Conservatism?

    The change she ushered through was moulded around a distinct ideology set on principles and beliefs that stemmed from the values of Traditional Conservatism and Classical Liberalism, however fundamentally, it was a modern day progression of the values laid down by the original thinkers of Conservatism .

  1. Are we Living in a 'Post - Ideological Society'?

    An ideology is a set of guidelines, giving explanations and justifications for a particular political structure and general way of life. Ideologies can be seen as 'regimes of truth'. They provide us with a language of political discourse, a set of assumptions and presuppositions about how society does and should

  2. Notes on John Stuart Mill's On Liberty

    latter part of On Liberty in favor of the new principle of the assignable obligation. This new principle is stated in this way by Elizabeth Rapaport: A person ought to be subject to social coercion only to prevent a violation of a "distinct and assignable obligation to any other person or persons."

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work