• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is the practice of humanitarian intervention compatible with an international system that is based on the principle of state sovereignty?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Is the practice of humanitarian intervention compatible with an international system that is based on the principle of state sovereignty? Ever since World War II, after the horrifying period of Adolph Hitler's homicidal persecution of the Jews, state leaders have been receiving new found pressure from both media and the public due to humanitarian sentiment and increasing awareness, regarding their power and capabilities in making decisions which can pose danger against humanity within their borders. Nevertheless, the practice of humanitarian intervention remained controversial concerning its legitimacy. According to state's argument of state sovereignty, Sovereignty is the quality of having supreme, independent authority over a territory, and that the practice of humanitarian interventions have breached the principle of state sovereignty (Bueno, 2009). The controversy grew over recent post cold war conflicts and the question of whether the practice of humanitarian intervention is compatible with an international system based on the principle of state sovereignty. State sovereignty is said to be the most important factor and the fundamental foundation of international relationship base on the anarchical system of the current world, as there is no existence of a supreme world government. ...read more.

Middle

Despite of breaching Article 2.4 of the UN Charter (Baylis and Smith, 2001), NATO proceeded with their campaign against the critics who argued that doing so means breaking the universally applied laws of state sovereignty and non intervention.The actions of NATO were not condemned by the Security Council, and thus furthermore undermining the international laws preserving state sovereignty as undermining the power of the Security Council. Regarding this controversy, Professor Cedric Thornberry stated "failure to comply with existing rules must inevitably bring about a wider condition of disrespect for the law and, with it, a tendency to anarchy" (Schotle, 2000) President Boris Yeltsin also commented corresponding to this view "an action that is nothing short of undisguised aggression... Only the UN Security Council has the right to decide the use of force should be taken to maintain or restore international peace and security"(Bueno, 2009) On the other hand, supporters of intervention deem NATO's actions were morally justified by arguing that it would be international community's negligence not taking any action to defend the norms of human rights, and that massive violations of human rights are taking place, it is no longer a domestic matter and thus deserve the concern of the international community. ...read more.

Conclusion

To answer the question whether the practice humanitarian intervention is compatible with an international system based on the principle of sovereignty, many critics argue it is the end for state sovereignty as the current world has shifted into a new paradigm where human rights become the priority. However, sovereignty will not cease to exist as long as there are borders between nations, instead, sovereignty calls for a reassessment for its definition in order to cope with the globalization of human rights. Word Count: 1396 BAYLIS, JOHN and SMITH, STEVE (2001). The Globalization of World Politics 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp 72-93 BUENO DE MESQUITA, BRUCE (2009). Principles of International Politics. 4th ed. Washington DC: CQ Press. pp 124-136 HEYWOOD, ANDREW (2002). Politics. 2nd ed. London: Palgrave Macmillan. pp 232-234 JACKSON, ROBERT and SORENSEN, GEORGE (2003). Introduction to International Relations. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp 578. SCHOLTE, JAN AART (2000). Globalization a critical introduction. United States of America: ST Martin's Press. pp 56 WHITMAN, JIM. (2001). When is it right to intervene?. New Humanist Magazine. 116 (1), 16. KIERNAN, BEN (2002). The Pol Pot Regime, New York: Yale University Press pp 44 Benny Iu IR Foundation Campus 5/3/2011 Lulwa Al-Fadhel ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Nationalism is a recipe for peace and international order. Discuss

    It is because of this profound belief that it can be argued that liberal nationalism looks beyond the nation to ideas of internationalism. Liberal nationalists uphold the principles of natural harmony and apply it to the nations of the world.

  2. How have political sociologist understood globalization? Globalization is perhaps the central concept of ...

    . on behalf of cultural singularity and people's control over their lives and environment' (1997: 2). Far from being the fragile flower that globalization tramples, identity is seen here as the upsurging power of local culture that offers (albeit multi-form, disorganized and sometimes politically reactionary)

  1. Russia's Political Party System as an Obstacle to Democratization

    Fedorov had left Yegor Gaidar's Russia's Choice party immediately following the 1993 election. Others represented new entities attempting to find a niche somewhere in the ideological spectrum. For example, the nationalist Congress of Russian Communities (KRO) formed as a party in 1994 and became one of the most visible political players in 1995 (Belin and Orttung 1997, 51).

  2. Concepts exercise - Sovereignty

    (Heywood, 1997, p143). Due to the existence of a typology, the concept is more likely to be contested. The nature of sovereignty advocated can also cast disagreements as not all interpretations are based on a democratic regime.

  1. Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons

    In comparison with those who are in public office or who manage governmental and other political organizations, corporate managers live in splendid freedom. Paying attention to stakeholders is, like many other aspects of corporate policy, a matter of management's choice.

  2. Is humanitarian intervention justifiable?

    This therefore shows political untruthfulness due to the fact that nations are using humanitarian intervention as a cover for their personal interest. Additionally, there is also a view that the citizens and the issues of a certain country are of that county?s business only and outside intervention is unnecessary.

  1. What were the most important factors in the rise of the modern state?

    This was a crucial development in the rise of the modern state as it was the monarchy that was in the best position to exploit this new wealth and organise the economy by way of taxation and force if necessary.

  2. Why has the concept of humanitarian intervention provoked so much debate in political commentary?

    In June 2008, the US relinquished its observer status and disengaged from the HRC, much to the disappointment and concern of human rights advocates who felt that this greatly diminished the role of the IGO and sent a negative message about the importance of human rights around the world.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work