• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is the strike no longer necessary?

Extracts from this document...


Is the strike no longer necessary? 'A strike has been defined as a temporary stoppage of work by a group of employees in order to express a grievance or enforce a demand.' (Hyman, 1984) Being the most overt and demonstrative form of industrial action, the strike is arguably the most misunderstood feature of industrial relations because of the critical way in which it is depicted in the media. Strikes, discouraged by UK legislation, arise for many reasons, some of which include disputes about pay, conditions of work, union recognition, demarcation disputes, health and safety, discipline and job security. In recent years there has been a general tendency for strikes to be defensive; they seek to defend existing wages, which is evident in the ongoing fire-fighters strike, and also existing working conditions, which is evident in the recent train strikes. The biggest single cause of strikes has traditionally been disputes over wages; the famous Pilkington strike of 1970 provides an excellent example of this. However, many strikes are also held because of fears about job certainties. This was reflected in the long and bitter Miners Strike in 1984, where workers were to lose jobs in the coal industry. Strikes tend to be viewed by union members as a last resort; disputes need not lead to a strike if there are alternative methods of resolving differences. They have a symbolic significance because they are the ultimate form of power in which damage can be inflicted in order to extract concessions or to defend existing positions. However, strikes have declined greatly since the 1980s. ...read more.


With the added pressure during the economic downturn of the early 1990s, where it was difficult for individuals to push for higher wages, and then the low inflation environment of the UK since then (low levels of inflation reduce employee expectations of higher pay increases whilst high levels of inflation tend to encourage strikes as concern with maintaining real income grow), unions have found it more productive to try and work with employers rather than fight them. This suggests that strikes are no longer necessary because there is an increased understanding between employers, subordinates and unions today. Although recent developments suggest that strikes are no longer necessary, we only have to look at current employment relation issues in the British economy to see that conflicts of interests still exist and that strikes are still occurring. Modern examples include strike action being taken by public sector workers including fire-fighters, teachers, university academics, and tube and rail workers. It is apparent that these individuals feel that they need to strike in order to demonstrate their determination on an issue or because negotiations have developed in such a way that a strike is seen as unavoidable. Current economic pressures in Britain propose suitable reasons as to why strike activity is still necessary. The 'London Weighting' dispute argues that the cost of living in London is too expensive, in relation to elsewhere in the UK, thus public sector workers want to be compensated for the higher cost of living. One aspect of the Association of University Teachers (AUT) case is that since 1992, the cost of living in London has risen substantially. ...read more.


Although strikes have intangible economic costs, they are occasionally necessary as we have discovered in the arguments presented above. In my judgement, strikes are only justified to an extent. Individuals should only resort to strike action if alternative methods of action have proved to be useless or if their complaints are not being taken seriously. However, I believe that many strikes today are unnecessary, particularly those that are economically motivated, because strikers cannot expect their full demands to be achieved, without some other sacrifice having to be made. For example, increases in salaries may mean a certain amount of job shedding is required and this can have potentially dire consequences for the rest of the economy. The fire-fighters case is a good illustration; whilst the fire-fighters argument is well presented, a 40% increase is too much to expect in a short time span. (This does not however mean that they are not entitled to an increase in pay) Nevertheless, if they are given the increase they want, other professions will soon be demanding the same, which could potentially cripple the economy. Therefore in the majority of cases it is not financially feasible to meet strikers' demands, as is evident in the fire-fighters case, thus suggesting that strikes are unnecessary. All things considered, conflicts of interests will always exist. It is unlikely that employers and employees will ever agree on all matters because both sets of individuals possess different interests. For example, employers' interests may include profit maximisation whilst employees' interests may include increased pay. Until organisations are able to balance these contrasting objectives, conflicting interests will continue to exist and individuals will continue to take severe forms of industrial action, through strikes if necessary, in order to convey their true feelings of contempt. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Trade Unions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Trade Unions essays

  1. To what extent has British employment relations changed since 1980?

    The undermining of collective bargaining added to the changes of employment relations. Due to the reduction in Trade Union membership, Collective Bargaining has also decreased. Other key measures introduced by the Conservative's were the reduction of statutory and protection rights of individual employees.

  2. Causes of the General Strike

    The government had now resigned to the fact that a general strike was imminent and began to make preparations for it. The government brought in an extra 131,000 police constables to stop potential trouble, gave detailed instructions to the army navy and police to guard docks, telephone exchanges and power

  1. Explain fully and clearly the importance of negotiation within industrial relations to resolve disputes

    > Not to be bullied by unions and public pressure. The government need to be aware of how the public is thinking as they have a strong influence on disputes. > Make sure the public doesn't swing too much against them.

  2. What were the main effects of the 1979-1997 Conservative governments’ reforms to collective ...

    New closed shops now needed 80% of its' work force to be in agreement or 85% of all those voting in order to make their place of work a closed shop. A right to be re-instated after maternity leave was introduced, the trade union recognition procedure was repealed, a code

  1. Why did the General Strike of 1926 take place?

    Coal was no longer in very high demand since new fuels and materials such as oil and gases were becoming available consequently an excessive quantity of coal was being produced. This caused the price of coal to drop dramatically; so many wages had to be reduced.

  2. Conflict at work: Industrial Disputes

    The whole issue with Manchester airport boils down to there being no winners in this industrial dispute, both workers and the bosses are affected negatively. The bosses in that the running of their airport is in jeopardy, if industrial action takes place, it will inevitably cost the airport a substancial amount of money.

  1. Discuss the view that industrial relations represents a redundant and anachronistic form of management ...

    There was becoming a widespread belief that the unions had become too powerful in 1970s. They go on to say, "the government's antipathy to unions went much further than this. Given the ideological commitment to free markets, to managerial authority and to individualism, the existence of unions was considered a hindrance to the proper working of the labour market."

  2. This paper explores the history of government, employee and employer associations and their effects ...

    Another form of union strategy was that of inclusive control. This strategy was based on the belief that once everyone had joined the relevant union, membership solidarity would prevent employers exploiting the weakness of individual employees. This of course has proved extremely difficult to achieve with any real consistency (Keenoy and Kelly, 1998)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work