• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is The US Constitution Too Rigid To Be Effective?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Is The US Constitution Too Rigid To Be Effective? The United States Constitution has served as a vital framework for the government and as a guarantee of the individual freedoms of US citizens since 1788, but from its creation, people have had ideas on how to improve this fundamental document. The vast majority of these ideas have been unsuccessful due to the rigid nature of the Constitution and the lengthy process involved when trying to amend it. Whether or not the inflexible nature of the constitution is an advantage or disadvantage is debatable as there are arguments that suggest the Constitution is made ineffective since it is so hard to change but also points arguing otherwise. Within 18 months of the Constitutions creation, the Bill of Rights was passed, adding 10 amendments to the brand new document. From 1789 to 1992, the Constitution was amended 27 times, and through judicial review, the meaning of various parts of the Constitution has changed many times. ...read more.

Middle

This method has been used only once; to ratify the 21st Amendment repealing Prohibition. The Supreme Court has also stated that ratification must be within "some reasonable time after the proposal." Beginning with the 18th amendment, it has been customary for Congress to set a definite period for ratification. In the case of the 18th, 20th, 21st, and 22nd amendments, the period set was 7 years, but there has been no determination as to just how long a "reasonable time" might extend. This long period of time taken to get proposals through the systems in place and time taken to ratify means that proposals rarely make any headway and the moment of their need has often passed by the time they are through Congress. This suggests that the system is too rigid to be effective as the time taken to get things done is ridiculous and often defeats the purpose of the amendment. Another problem with the inflexibility of the Constitution is due to the way it sets out how checks and balances operate. ...read more.

Conclusion

It can be argued that Americans have done well and that their constitution has been successful in both protecting their rights as well as providing the backbone for the 'beacon on the hill' nation that the US has become. The long amendment process has been able to prevent short-term political changes and instead people can rely on the Supreme Court to change their interpretation to match the times, allowing the Constitution to remain up to date. For example the Roper vs. Simmons in which the Supreme Court decided that there should be no death penalty for under 18's and deemed it unconstitutional to do so. The vagueness of the Constitution seems to combat its rigidness, as it is so vague that it can have many different interpretations, which, as mentioned earlier, allow the Supreme Court to keep it up to date with modern interpretation. This also allows different states to hold laws different to their neighbouring states such as policies on same sex marriages, capital punishment and gun laws. This means that states can accommodate the different needs of their people through initiatives/referendums. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. How well does the US Constitution Work

    be kept, as the needs of a nation and circumstances is something that would be altering rather than static and that would empower the people to make changes, as they perceived a need to do so. As a result, at times of calamity, governments have previously been able to deal with situations without infringing the liberties of citizens.

  2. How effective are the checks and balances of the Constitution today?

    Neither house can adjourn for more than three days, without the consent of the other house; this is an example of when the President can use his power of adjournment over Congress if neither house can agree on adjournment. The House of Representatives has the power to impeach the executive

  1. How is Britain's constitution changing in the 21st century?

    Europe is having an ever increasing impact on Britain in the scope of binding legislation and the incorporation of the ECHR which produces an international standard of a Bill of Rights throughout the E.U. I will identify how the form of the British constitution is changing due to Europe being a suprenational body.

  2. Outline the differences between the electoral systems for the US Presidency, the US Senate ...

    The framers of the constitution saw the House pf Representatives as the seat of major control in the country as the directly elected body representing the people. In their decision to directly elect the House, they were influenced by the ideas of the separation of powers, bicameralism and federalism.7 Along

  1. Using Suetonius and Res Gestae, assess how effective Octavian was in enlisting Senatorial Support ...

    as a single unity, but all senators were interested in the maintenance of the Roman Constitution and the pursuit of wealth. The magistrates, therefore, had an incentive to gain higher positions, but Octavian also wanted them to know that they had an essential role in governing a successful Empire, and he needed their co-operation.

  2. Assess the view that the US Constitution often ensures limited government

    However, this does not necessarily ensure limited government, and if anything, it puts the government more at risk of tyranny, since the executive is appointing the judiciary, and having a big influence over how the court operates, which goes against the separation of powers.

  1. Critically analyse the appointment and confirmation process for nominees in the US Supreme Court

    Clarence Thomas described the process as a ?high tech lynching? and continued ?I have heard enough lies. Today is not a day that in my opinion is not high among the days of our country. This is a travesty. You spent the entire day destroying what it has taken me

  2. How effective has the US been at defending civil liberties at a time of ...

    Bush's only ally was Justice Clarence Thomas, who argued that the president may suspend the Constitution at will if he believes, or claims to believe, that he is doing so to protect the country. The result is that the balance between effective government and personal freedom has tilted dangerously away from liberty, undermining the core principle of the Constitution.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work