• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is The US Constitution Too Rigid To Be Effective?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Is The US Constitution Too Rigid To Be Effective? The United States Constitution has served as a vital framework for the government and as a guarantee of the individual freedoms of US citizens since 1788, but from its creation, people have had ideas on how to improve this fundamental document. The vast majority of these ideas have been unsuccessful due to the rigid nature of the Constitution and the lengthy process involved when trying to amend it. Whether or not the inflexible nature of the constitution is an advantage or disadvantage is debatable as there are arguments that suggest the Constitution is made ineffective since it is so hard to change but also points arguing otherwise. Within 18 months of the Constitutions creation, the Bill of Rights was passed, adding 10 amendments to the brand new document. From 1789 to 1992, the Constitution was amended 27 times, and through judicial review, the meaning of various parts of the Constitution has changed many times. ...read more.

Middle

This method has been used only once; to ratify the 21st Amendment repealing Prohibition. The Supreme Court has also stated that ratification must be within "some reasonable time after the proposal." Beginning with the 18th amendment, it has been customary for Congress to set a definite period for ratification. In the case of the 18th, 20th, 21st, and 22nd amendments, the period set was 7 years, but there has been no determination as to just how long a "reasonable time" might extend. This long period of time taken to get proposals through the systems in place and time taken to ratify means that proposals rarely make any headway and the moment of their need has often passed by the time they are through Congress. This suggests that the system is too rigid to be effective as the time taken to get things done is ridiculous and often defeats the purpose of the amendment. Another problem with the inflexibility of the Constitution is due to the way it sets out how checks and balances operate. ...read more.

Conclusion

It can be argued that Americans have done well and that their constitution has been successful in both protecting their rights as well as providing the backbone for the 'beacon on the hill' nation that the US has become. The long amendment process has been able to prevent short-term political changes and instead people can rely on the Supreme Court to change their interpretation to match the times, allowing the Constitution to remain up to date. For example the Roper vs. Simmons in which the Supreme Court decided that there should be no death penalty for under 18's and deemed it unconstitutional to do so. The vagueness of the Constitution seems to combat its rigidness, as it is so vague that it can have many different interpretations, which, as mentioned earlier, allow the Supreme Court to keep it up to date with modern interpretation. This also allows different states to hold laws different to their neighbouring states such as policies on same sex marriages, capital punishment and gun laws. This means that states can accommodate the different needs of their people through initiatives/referendums. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. How well does the US Constitution Work

    be kept, as the needs of a nation and circumstances is something that would be altering rather than static and that would empower the people to make changes, as they perceived a need to do so. As a result, at times of calamity, governments have previously been able to deal with situations without infringing the liberties of citizens.

  2. Has the US Constituion Protected Individual Liberties?

    In the 1969 Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District case, several students who were punished for wearing black arm-bands to school in protest against the Vietnam War, were able to look to the first amendment for protection. The Supreme Court ruled that freedom of expression rights extended to

  1. How effective are the checks and balances of the Constitution today?

    President, if this ten days comes to an end while Congress is adjourned, the bill seizes to exist, this is usually used as a tactic by the President so that he does not loose face. Because of the way that bills are passed through Congress, the President can 'arrange' if

  2. Using Suetonius and Res Gestae, assess how effective Octavian was in enlisting Senatorial Support ...

    as the senators and: "exchanged social calls with many noblemen" (Suetonius 53) He therefore wanted the upper class to feel loyalty to the principle of the constitution, and willingly participate in the government. The Senate was comprised of many different men with many different agendas and so cannot be perceived

  1. Assess the view that the US Constitution often ensures limited government

    However, this does not necessarily ensure limited government, and if anything, it puts the government more at risk of tyranny, since the executive is appointing the judiciary, and having a big influence over how the court operates, which goes against the separation of powers.

  2. Critically analyse the appointment and confirmation process for nominees in the US Supreme Court

    A Republican controlled Senate would endeavour to not select a candidate with a philosophy of judicial activism, similarly a Democrat controlled Senate may not select a candidate with a philosophy of judicial restraint. Thus in given instances the senate manipulate the appointments and confirmation process for their own gain, politicisation ensues as a result.

  1. How effective has the US been at defending civil liberties at a time of ...

    They argue that the constitution is too flexible and complain that it has allowed the government, especially the executive branch, to use periods of crisis to steadily undermine those mechanisms in the constitution which protect liberty, which should protect citizens from the accumulation of power by the national government.

  2. American Government Term Paper #1. Discuss the theory of Checks and Balances as outlined ...

    This protection from double jeopardy was at the core for the Palko v. Connecticut case, which was in 1937. The court decided that double jeopardy was not one of the provisions in the Fourteenth Amendment as a restraint on the powers of the states.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work