• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is there a democratic deficit at the heart of the European Union

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Is there a democratic deficit at the heart of the European Union The question of the democratic deficit involves not just a discussion of the role of the European Parliament, but also an examination of the roles of other institutions, and especially the need to look at the way in which these institutions relate to each other. The main emphasis lies with the three main "institutions" of the European Union - the Commission, the European Council and Council of Ministers and the European Parliament. The European Union continues to play an important role in traditionally domestic areas of policy, but many people however see the union as distant, and believe they have extremely little involvement and influence. The only body over which they have any control, the European Parliament, is by far the weakest, and important decisions are seen as being taken behind 'closed doors'. This lack of public accountability in the European Union is known as the 'Democratic Deficit.' The term, 'Democratic Deficit' refers to, "The growing gap between the power and authority of EU institutions". As more aspects of national sovereignty are transferred to the European level, the ability of citizens to influence and supervise this new power base has declined significantly. ...read more.

Middle

Just as the European Commission can be viewed as the body of supranationalism, the European Council can be seen as the epitome of the intergovernmental ideal. Basically, the Council consists of the leaders and foreign ministers of the nation-states of the European Union together with the Commission president (Prodi). The European Council also has a proven track record of effectiveness, as many decisive turning points in the history of the European Union came about at Council meetings, such as that at Maastricht in 1991. An important point to make in regard to the European Council is that national governments, since the Single European Act of 1986, no longer have the right to veto proposed initiatives, rather decisions are taken using a system known as Qualified Majority Voting (QMV). The Council of Ministers mirrors the European Council, dealing not with national issues but with sectional affairs such as agriculture or transport. It plays a valuable part in co-ordinating the efforts of national governments on a continent wide basis. Critics state that in many ways, its powers make the representive Council more like the legislature body than the elected Parliament. Parliament has no authority to endorse appointments, and indeed has no influence over selecting candidates. ...read more.

Conclusion

The idea of a Parliament of Europe, to represent the hopes and aspirations of Europe's people is a noble ideal. However, it is a concept, which the people are not ready for. The view of Euro co-operation in the Parliament is an attractive one, but does it really make a difference, which way votes go when the Parliament makes little or no difference to policy making? Ultimately, the people of the European Union do not want a powerful European Parliament, most wish for questions of national interest, to continue to be resolved at a intergovernmental level rather than a supra-national level. That said Parliament does have a role in addressing concerns common to all European Union citizens, issues such as the environment and human rights, which at present are dealt with largely by the unaccountable Commision. From this it is clear that the democratic deficit will never be resolved until the European Union is willing to strike a balance, and change the framework of the European Union's institutions. It has to be remembered that this was only ever an economic body, which has evolved into a political arena and the levels of accountablity haven't evolved similarly, allowing for a Union devoid of accountability and lacking a mandate to implement legislation. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. How important is the European Parliament?

    Even in Italy, where voting is compulsory, there was only a 73.1% turnout in 2004. Low turnout results in a lack of authority, some would argue, but others would argue that the EP's laws are implemented and apply to all, regardless of turnout, as the state is not optional, and thus low turnout has a negligible effect on authority.

  2. European Union

    Traditionally, two methods of EU policy making have been contrasted: inter-governmentalism, with decisions led by national governments and depending on consensus support in the Council of Ministers; the 'Community' or supra-national method, led by the Commission, with majority voting in the Council of Ministers that can override the objections of particular member states.

  1. can the European Parliament be regarded as an effective legislative

    'While only a handful of legislative procedures are blocked by the European Parliament-under co-deicision only nine have been blocked since the end of 2005-many proposals are significantly altered including on matters of political substance' (Nugent, 2006)

  2. Is there a democratic deficit in the EU? What are its implications and how ...

    they target and lobby the Commission and the Council of Ministers than they are the Parliament. The disproportionate amount of money and expertise that different pressure groups have, and their knowledge of the workings of the EU far outweigh that of ordinary citizens and can be seen as a hindrance to democracy.

  1. What does citizenship mean in the European context?

    that citizenship reinforces and renders more tangible the individual's sentiment of belonging to the Union; and b. that citizenship confers on the individual citizen rights which tie him to the Union.[5] Something was going amiss in the public relations of the Union.

  2. Economic and political integration between the member states of the European Union means that ...

    This currency was than later named Euro who was firstly mentioned in 1969 at the European Summit in The Hague. 10 years later in 1979 the process was re-launched with the creation of the European Monetary System (EMS), which constituted an unprecedented transfer of monetary autonomy.

  1. To What Extent Does the EU Display a 'Democratic Deficit'?

    The situation improved marginally in 2004, with a UK turnout of 38%. Throughout Europe a steady downward trend in turn out to European elections can be seen since 1979. One way of tackling this problem is to make voting compulsory; this method has been adopted in Belgium and Luxembourg.

  2. To what extent is there a democratic deficit in the EU?

    In the 1999 European elections the voter turnout for Britain was just 23%. The party 'List' method of elections has caused a great deal of controversy and there is a strong argument that the system can be regarded as undemocratic.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work