• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is there a democratic deficit in the EU? What are its implications and how could it be reversed?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Is there a democratic deficit in the EU? What are its implications and how could it be reversed? When the Santer Commission resigned in 1999 many political commentators thought that the EU's key areas of democratic deficit would be addressed. However, 7 years later with the Andreasen scandal still in progress, little seems to have been done. Within the EU there is only one directly elected body, the European Parliament, whilst the two other main legitimising institutions, the Council of Ministers (CoM) and the Commission (Com) remain unelected. The implications upon the functions and roles of these institutions and their need to be reformed, especially in relation to the weakness of the European Parliament in relation to the Commission, has urged many commentators argue that there are issues of transparency and accountability which need to be reformed for the democratic deficit (D.D.) to be resolved. This is recognised and solutions are offered by the Constitutional Treaty (C.T.) which is in the process of being ratified by all member states. Despite being the only fully elected body in the EU the supranational European Parliament often deals with criticism for having a democratic deficit for many reasons. ...read more.

Middle

Also it is questionable as to how much the Commission has reformed since 1999, the Court of Auditors are very unhappy and refuse to sign off 'the books' suggesting that perhaps there is still financial mismanagement occurring. The present Andreasen Affair shows that reforms have not gone far enough and that stronger checks need to be in place. The Council of Ministers (which can be both supranational and intergovernmental depending upon voting methods and the issues concerned) is regarded as a more democratic institution of the EU as ministers are supposed to be accountable to their own Parliament but in some member states such as the UK there can be little control over the their ministers due to the electoral system (in the UK the FPTP system usually returns a strong majority despite voter preferences: in 2005 Labour formed a government with a majority of 67 despite winning 36% of the vote against the Tories 33% and having gained only 22% of the total adult vote). The issue of secrecy and lack of transparency within the Council of Ministers, as with the Commission, is indispensable to the debate of the democratic deficit. ...read more.

Conclusion

D'Estaing's Convention in 2002 looked at the reform of Parliament, i.e. making it more representative, accountable and effective. This is a large issue but also a very important one because the European Parliament is the only directly elected institution. To make the Parliament more effective, the council of ministers could be made directly accountable to the Parliament. Also the Parliament could be given the power to appoint and dismiss individual commissioners. This would most certainly improve the relationship between the branches of EU government and make the institutions more accountable to Parliament and in doing so the EU public. The likelihood of this happening however is remote: the CoM members are drawn from their national governments and such governments are unlikely to want to be more accountable to other member states when it is their own electorate who put them into power. If the Democratic Deficit is not tackled future EU devolvement may be stifled as it could lack citizens' support and fuel the rise of European scepticism. With an increasingly powerful yet unaccountable Commission and future enlargements (Romania, Bulgaria 2007, then perhaps Turkey and Croatia in the future) on the horizon the solutions offered to these problems need to be put into action swiftly if the EU dream is not to crumble. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. A clear explanation of key underpinning economic theories relevant to the EU.

    In return results in production increases, benefit to the country, and could also benefit from economies of scale. The single European market dose not implement the following trade barriers and by doing so trade is encouraged between member's states: (treaty of Rome)

  2. To What Extent Does the EU Display a 'Democratic Deficit'?

    Finally, constituencies may have many MEPs representing them (e.g. in the South East constituency there are 10 MEPs) but the constituency size is huge (the South East region covers 6 million eligible voters) meaning that each MEP represents over half a million voters (in contrast with MPs who typically represent just 70,000 voters).

  1. can the European Parliament be regarded as an effective legislative

    While in principle the European parliament does have these powers of veto and therefore is quite an effective legislative body, the powers of the council out stip the parliament and therefore significantly reduce parliaments influence in the European Union. Another area where the Parliaments powers fall down slightly is that

  2. Which EU institution is the most powerful

    If these proposals are approved, they become law and it is another role of the Commission to administer what now become EU policies. Moreover the Commission has been the source of some of the most important policy initiatives such as the single market program and the 'Euro' and has been

  1. Is a steady retreat from democracy a

    This linkage can be improved which would strengthen the legitimacy of the European Parliament. However, even the most representative and legitimate European Parliament could be ineffective in ensuring levels of democracy if its abilities and powers within the framework of the European Union are weak in comparison to other EU institutions.

  2. Issues pertaining to the professional conduct of IT professionals

    This is evidently due to the phenomenal rise of the 'Information System' era that has benefited BCS immensely as it saw an increase in memberships, which lead to an increase in BCS's power of influence. BCS has also gained global respect and is steadily growing outside of the UK as well as outside of Europe.

  1. To what extent is there a democratic deficit in the EU?

    The very complexity of the legislative procedures also means that it is virtually impossible for even experts to understand them. In addition much of the decision making takes place behind closed doors. They have also targeted European elections as decentralised, apathetic affairs.

  2. In view of the limits on the powers of the European Parliament it isoften ...

    My first reason for agreeing with the democratic flaw is based on the distribution of seats in the European Parliament. Members of European Parliament according to each member state are determined largely on population; the number of MEP's of a member state should reflect the population, however this is not exactly the case.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work