• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is there a democratic deficit in the EU? What are its implications and how could it be reversed?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Is there a democratic deficit in the EU? What are its implications and how could it be reversed? When the Santer Commission resigned in 1999 many political commentators thought that the EU's key areas of democratic deficit would be addressed. However, 7 years later with the Andreasen scandal still in progress, little seems to have been done. Within the EU there is only one directly elected body, the European Parliament, whilst the two other main legitimising institutions, the Council of Ministers (CoM) and the Commission (Com) remain unelected. The implications upon the functions and roles of these institutions and their need to be reformed, especially in relation to the weakness of the European Parliament in relation to the Commission, has urged many commentators argue that there are issues of transparency and accountability which need to be reformed for the democratic deficit (D.D.) to be resolved. This is recognised and solutions are offered by the Constitutional Treaty (C.T.) which is in the process of being ratified by all member states. Despite being the only fully elected body in the EU the supranational European Parliament often deals with criticism for having a democratic deficit for many reasons. ...read more.

Middle

Also it is questionable as to how much the Commission has reformed since 1999, the Court of Auditors are very unhappy and refuse to sign off 'the books' suggesting that perhaps there is still financial mismanagement occurring. The present Andreasen Affair shows that reforms have not gone far enough and that stronger checks need to be in place. The Council of Ministers (which can be both supranational and intergovernmental depending upon voting methods and the issues concerned) is regarded as a more democratic institution of the EU as ministers are supposed to be accountable to their own Parliament but in some member states such as the UK there can be little control over the their ministers due to the electoral system (in the UK the FPTP system usually returns a strong majority despite voter preferences: in 2005 Labour formed a government with a majority of 67 despite winning 36% of the vote against the Tories 33% and having gained only 22% of the total adult vote). The issue of secrecy and lack of transparency within the Council of Ministers, as with the Commission, is indispensable to the debate of the democratic deficit. ...read more.

Conclusion

D'Estaing's Convention in 2002 looked at the reform of Parliament, i.e. making it more representative, accountable and effective. This is a large issue but also a very important one because the European Parliament is the only directly elected institution. To make the Parliament more effective, the council of ministers could be made directly accountable to the Parliament. Also the Parliament could be given the power to appoint and dismiss individual commissioners. This would most certainly improve the relationship between the branches of EU government and make the institutions more accountable to Parliament and in doing so the EU public. The likelihood of this happening however is remote: the CoM members are drawn from their national governments and such governments are unlikely to want to be more accountable to other member states when it is their own electorate who put them into power. If the Democratic Deficit is not tackled future EU devolvement may be stifled as it could lack citizens' support and fuel the rise of European scepticism. With an increasingly powerful yet unaccountable Commission and future enlargements (Romania, Bulgaria 2007, then perhaps Turkey and Croatia in the future) on the horizon the solutions offered to these problems need to be put into action swiftly if the EU dream is not to crumble. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    ‘The main democratic deficit in the European Union is psychological, not institutional.’ Discuss.

    4 star(s)

    European parties are also not indicative of policy preferences in each country e.g. New Labour amalgamated into Party of European Socialists. Nevertheless, so far I have only pointed out the so-called 'institutional' aspects of the democratic deficit within the EU.

  2. A clear explanation of key underpinning economic theories relevant to the EU.

    In return results in production increases, benefit to the country, and could also benefit from economies of scale. The single European market dose not implement the following trade barriers and by doing so trade is encouraged between member's states: (treaty of Rome)

  1. To What Extent Does the EU Display a 'Democratic Deficit'?

    Finally, constituencies may have many MEPs representing them (e.g. in the South East constituency there are 10 MEPs) but the constituency size is huge (the South East region covers 6 million eligible voters) meaning that each MEP represents over half a million voters (in contrast with MPs who typically represent just 70,000 voters).

  2. EU functions

    Each DG is given a policy area and is then answerable to one of the commissioners dealing in that area. It is actually the DG's that are behind any legislation proposals, they draft and prepare them but these proposals are only recognised as being an official proposal when a commissioner adopts it to a commission meeting.

  1. can the European Parliament be regarded as an effective legislative

    The European parliament does act as quite an effective legislative system, although it has a more power in certain areas than it does in others. There are certainly a few problems with the parliamentary set up with regard to the power in which it can exercise itself as a effect legislative.

  2. Which EU institution is the most powerful

    The Commission is made up of a President and the College of Commissioners (the political arm), and the Directorate Generals (DGs) and other specialised agencies (the administrative arm). The current Commission (1999-2004) consists of 20 Commissioners, including the President (Jose Manuel Borroso), who are appointed by common agreement among the

  1. Is a steady retreat from democracy a

    If they are held during mid-term of national parliament they tend to register an anti government swing'. This means those who do vote are not doing so out of preferences for future EU policies or dissatisfaction of the previous MEP's performance instead the electorate is voting over national issues.

  2. Issues pertaining to the professional conduct of IT professionals

    This is evidently due to the phenomenal rise of the 'Information System' era that has benefited BCS immensely as it saw an increase in memberships, which lead to an increase in BCS's power of influence. BCS has also gained global respect and is steadily growing outside of the UK as well as outside of Europe.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work