• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is There A Need For Constitutional Reform?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Is There A Need For Constitutional Reform? No government in modern times has ever been elected with such a commitment to reforming the constitution as the Labour administration that won office in May 1997. Within months of its election, Scotland and Wales were on the road to devolution. Within a year, although in a very different context, the framework had been set for a devolved, power sharing government in Northern Ireland. A year after that the process was well under way for reform of the House of Lords, eliminating, in the first instance, peers whose place in the legislature was by inheritance. In May 2000, London elected its first mayor. In early 2003, there was the affirmation of a commitment to allow English regions to choose to elect assemblies. Then in the Cabinet reshuffle of June 2003 it was signalled that the post of Lord Chancellor would be abolished and the judicial functions of the House of Lords transferred lo a Supreme Court. Above all, the government held out the promise of Britain signing up to a European constitution sometime in 2004-5, which would formally subjugate British law to European law and have many other consequences for political accountability in Britain. ...read more.

Middle

Only time will tell whether this is really so. However, the immediate perception is that this extra layer of government has so far achieved little except to enrich the politicians who serve in it. The English taxpayer is subsidising the exercise, and nothing has yet been done to correct constitutional unbalances. Matters on which the English have no say in Scotland are matters on which Scottish MPs at Westminster have a when they concern the English. Scotland is overrepresented at Westminster, although that be partially rectified by the time of the next; general election, when representation is to be on the same basis as in England. Despite the establishment of administrations in Wales and Scotland, there are still ministers with responsibilities for those parties of the kingdom in London. The British Cabinet is more than a quarter Scottish. Both the Health Secretary, John Reid, and the Transport Secretary, Alistair Darling, have responsibility for policies that do not - because they represent Scottish seats affect their own constituents. It seems as the one set of constitutional injustices - if, indeed, is really what the old system amounted to - merely been replaced by another, although replacement is one in which the rights of majorities no longer (unlike in most democracies) ...read more.

Conclusion

Unsurprisingly, the party that now expresses the greatest enthusiasm for radical constitutional change - English regional government, elected mayors, proportional representation, an elected second chamber and an unspecified reduction in the few remaining powers of the monarch - is the Liberal Democrats, who have no realistic chance of forming a government. The Conservative Party, which despite being so against constitutional change has engineered more than its share of it over the years (such as the peerage reforms of 1958 and 1963, and the 1972 European Communities Act), still has to take a defined position on many of these questions, although it has announced its outright opposition to the proposed European constitution. The significance of the European proposals is that they must now take centre stage in the government's programme of constitutional reform. They will also, though, take the whole question out of the government's hands to some extent as the pace is being dictated by an external power. The government refuses to consult the electorate on them. The prospect was not included in the 2001 Labour manifesto. This pursuit of vast constitutional change without a mandate could yet derail not just the programme of reform but even the whole government. ?? ?? ?? ?? Daniel Jenkins 12Et ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How successful has constitutional reform been since 1997 ?

    3 star(s)

    Senior judicial appointments are controlled by an independent committee of senior judges .However the new largely appointed house of lords falls well short of being properly accountable , authoritative and representative . Only a fully elected second chamber , they argue is acceptable.

  2. priministers power

    'The Prime Minister can arrange visits abroad, which usually draw considerable press and television coverage as do his receptions for statesmen visiting Britain. ' (Macintosh). * Crossman emphasises the Prime Minister's control of government publicity and the 'gloss' he can put on government policies.

  1. The Labour Party.

    * They quickly gained popularity from certain elements of British society and obtained 11.6% of the vote in 1983. * Ideologically the Liberals and the Social Democrats were very similar and at the 1987 General Election they formed an Alliance.

  2. House Of Lords Reform - What did the 1999 act reforming the lords ...

    If the peers were part of a political party or followed a certain ideology, then if they were to disagree with that party's policy, then the peers could not be deselected or forced out of a job like MP's can under party whip systems.

  1. Media or Manifesto?

    the great political minds believe the media holds important influence, and perhaps that time spent focussing on the media is time that could be better spent focussing on the electorate. Blair even thanked the sun after victory for its "magnificent support which really did make the difference".14 One argument against

  2. WHAT WAS THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE LIBERAL ELECTION VICTORY OF 1906

    The Liberals introduced this, but the Labour Party pressed for its alternative bill. The Government gave in and passed the Labour bill as the Trades Disputes Act 1906, giving unions immunity from legal proceedings. Another significance is there was public outcry against the use of Chinese slave labourers in the Transvaal gold mines.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work