• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is war Inevitable?

Extracts from this document...


What is war? Many people think of it as fighting for something and others think of it as a struggle. War is defined in the Oxford English Dictionary as a quarrel usually between nations conducted by force. In my opinion war is never going to end, it is inevitable. If war comes to an end it will be from failure of human wisdom. As far as we know, war has always been part of our human history, and it probably occurred from time to time, in one form or another, even throughout our prehistory, that is, for as far back as humans existed. Why do people have war? My answer is so that they can accomplish political objectives, such as to move borders or move them back to acquire land or get it back, to acquire resources or get them back. ...read more.


Some people will say, "I'm not going to go to war, why should I risk my life?" but they still go to war either to better their way of life or to protect their way of life. We are taught from an early age that patriotism is a virtue. One of the reasons for this is that the only power leaders of countries have lies in their ability to get people to kill and die for them. People do not decide to have wars; the leaders of countries make those decisions. They are made for a variety of reasons, and the people are rarely told the real reason. People have war because it is the nature of trade, to gain pride and power, the environment and because it is the nature of mankind. There have been many wars that have occurred around the world, two of the biggest wars that have happened in the world are clearly World War I and World War II. ...read more.


Furthermore, soldiers, as well as civilians tend to run the risk of being injured, maimed, killed, and sometimes brainwashed. So many people have lost their loved ones in a war, it was and still is a huge problem in the world, but we really have do not have a choice. In conclusion war will always be a problem in this world, whether we like it or not, we need war to settle and get things straight. But as far as I'm concerned fighting is in the blood of humans, it is a state of mankind, and therefore we will never be able to stop it. For that reason, war is inevitable. We are at a new beginning, and the view ahead, though cloudy, is rich with promise. War will continue for a while, certainly during the rest of our lives, but it will no longer be functional in an evolutionary sense, and it will wither away as everyone comes to realize and accept the essential unity of humankind. :) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

2 Stars - Although articulate in places, this is a superficial piece of writing which deals in generalised comments and narrative rather than analysing or evaluating the causes or effects of warfare. Examples of warfare are abundant in human history, but these examples are used only cosmetically in this piece rather than for support or enlightenment.

Marked by teacher Dan Carter 15/10/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Compare the views about the nature and development of Carl Rogers and George Kelly. ...

    Both Rogers and Kelly considered Adler to be a strong influence within their personality theories and both joined the American Association of Humanistic Psychology. Because of Kelly's and Rogers' background in Humanistic Psychology, their views on motivation of the human personality were similar, as they felt the ultimate aim for

  2. Compare and contrast the pluralist, elitist and Marxist theories of the state.

    As it turned out the results favoured the joining of the EEC. This perfect example depicts the elitist concept that individuals or groups are able to exercise power be preventing those who take a decision by limiting the amount of decisions they are allowed to take.

  1. Why and to what extent, have conservatives supported One Nation principles?

    They believed that the state had an obligation to intervene in the economy to provide welfare services to prevent abject poverty.

  2. This essay is aimed to discuss the meaning of ideology and it different uses ...

    Its other central beliefs are human imperfection, Organic society, Authority and Property. (A. Heywood, 1992 pp27+69). Socialism is a political and economic theory or system of social organisation, based on collective or state ownership of the means of production, distribution and exchange similar to capitalism, it takes many diverse forms, and it is a continually developing concept.

  1. Is the 'New Right' a departure from or a continuation of traditional British Conservatism?

    Indeed, some of the differences within Conservatism are reflected in the tremendous difference between these two giants of Toryism or Conservatism alone. This complexity is not surprising considering the Party's long history which has seen Conservatives adapt and respond to changing circumstances in order to meet the needs of the Nation and Party.

  2. How far was the Decline of the Liberal Party in the Period 1867 to ...

    Therefore it can be argued that the development of class based politics as a result of the reform acts spelled an inevitable decline of the Liberal Party. However, universal suffrage was not granted until 1918. Only 60% of adult males could vote, and the majority of the working class was left out.

  1. Assess the view that most power in modern western societies is held by people ...

    Weber defined 3 types of authority: Charismatic Authority (The type of authority based on charisma), Traditional Authority (The type of power based on established customs) and Rational-legal authority (The type of authority devised from impersonal rules). Weber saw rational-legal authority as the dominant form of authority in modern societies, not only armies but also political, religious and educational organisations.

  2. Define hegemony and explain its significance for Global World Order. (15)

    The hegemonic state has a crucial stake in the system, by ensuring the stability of such system the hegemon is attending to its own long term interests. The Hegemon's ability to do so stems from the fact as a hegemon, the state has the ability to deliver public goods.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work