• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Islamism is far more diverse than a violent political ideology. Discuss.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Islamism is far more diverse than a violent political ideology. Discuss. Especially after the event of 9/11, Islamism has been increasingly frowned upon in societies. Political Islam and its seemingly uncooperative nature have brought forth connotations of terrorism, suicide bombings and political instability. The world continues to be on their guard against terrorist threats, and hatreds continue to be harbored, especially in the West. However, little is known about their diversity, which is important in achieving non-biased views on Islamism as a holistic movement. In truth, Islamism is a complex phenomenon with multiple dimensions and various ramifications. According to Ayoob (2004), in practice, no two Islamisms are alike because they are determined by the contexts within which they operate. This essay will argue firstly, that Islamism, like Islam, is not monolithic. It has a diverse array of political objectives and tactics in a Muslim world spanning Africa and Asia. The essay will argue therefore, that Islamism is not an inherently violent political ideology. It will discuss the media's overemphasis on violent Jihadi groups, which has presented many misconceptions about Islamism. ...read more.

Middle

Understanding this would create space for the notion of a 'varying Islamism'. Islamism, or an Islamism, is also largely dependent on the context in which it is placed. 'What works in Egypt, will not work in Indonesia. What works in Saudi Arabia, will not work in Turkey' (Ayoob, 2004). According to Ayoob (2005), there are almost as many varieties of political Islam as there are states that are predominantly Muslim. Like Islam itself, Islamism is context-specific, as a result of the many different interpretations of religious precepts and local culture (Levin, 2006). By understanding the existence Islamism, or any other worldwide political movement, we are able understand how it is impossible for it to survive without diversity, and solely on violence. Lawrence (1998) suggests that the principal reason for the negative view of Islam as violent, and alien, is the predominance in popular thinking of the 'public Islam'. 'Public Islam' is defined by Lawrence as the Islam identified by political scientists, journalists, and policy makers, mostly as adversaries (Lawrence, 2005). ...read more.

Conclusion

Although Islamism as a political movement is one that is antidemocratic and bears a holistic vision of Islam, whose final aim is the restoration of a worldwide caliphate, many Islamist groups have seen to put violence out of the agenda. The jihad, which Claiming that Islamism has tried to achieve its political means solely through violence, is unfair to the far greater majority of Islamist groups which have and still carry out peaceful political activity in whatever their context. Violent jihadist groups such as the Al-Qaeda, Islamic Jihad and al-Gamaa al-Islamiya (Egypt), Laskar Jihad and Jema'ah Islamiah (Southeast Asia), and Lashkar-i-Taiba and Jaish-i-Muhammad (Pakistan) are in fact a very small minority of Islamist groups (Ayoob, 2005). Islamism faces its own danger of a small but growing fraction of their Muslim fundamentalist-fanatic minority which embraces violence. But their embrace of violence is more the result of a lack of modern education, than Islamist theory. According to Mahmood (2002), because of the lack of education in Muslim nations, Islamists tend to be more emotional than rational and pragmatic. This does not mean that they are inherently violent, however they would be more susceptible to being violent than the more contemporary political religions. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. This essay is aimed to discuss the meaning of ideology and it different uses ...

    For liberal the belief of the primacy of individual is the characteristic theme and has had important implication for liberal thought. Conservatism aspires for the preservation of the best establishes society, and opposes radical change; a desire to maintain established customs and institutions.

  2. 'Parties do not matter anymore.' Discuss.

    Furthermore, the national committees and other party committees e.g. the National Republican Senatorial Committee, have played an increasingly assertive role in fund-raising activities. They co-ordinate and distribute funds to party candidates, particularly in close contests and in open seats in which there is no incumbent.

  1. Assess critically Marx's distinction between ideology and science

    Marx thus became a prophet of the proletarian revolution: he called upon the workers of the world to overthrow the oppressive institutions. The point of the communist revolution a la Marx broadly corresponds with the visions of the Young Hegelians - the liberation of the oppressed and the destitute.

  2. Russia's Political Party System as an Obstacle to Democratization

    This impression was derived from one event: his decisive conducting of the second Chechen War. For the Unity Party in particular, part of its success was due to not enabling voters to clearly identify that party's place in Russia's ideological space.

  1. Free essay

    Nationalism is inherently aggressive and expansionist. Discuss

    The UK, for example, is a union of four cultural nations. Nationalism is a political doctrine based on the principle that a group of people bound by common values (a nation), have the right to form a state. Because it is a doctrine as opposed to an ideology, nationalism is compatible with various opposing political beliefs.

  2. Breaking down the Walls: A Discourse of Ideology and "Otherness"

    Similarily, Wright foregrounds how the racial ideology of America shapes the so called truths attached to not only blacks, but every race. Like Richard Wright, I fully agree and declare that the ideas that are attached to all races are mere ideological constructions.

  1. This essay will firstly look at the divisions within Canada and how these divisions ...

    Firstly, we must first define political culture and toryism. The question of political culture is important because it establishes the 'rules of the game' for poltics1. For politicians, political culture is the answer to electoral success because it provides an answer to what the public envisions from its political leaders.

  2. Nationalism is inherently expansionist and destructive - discuss

    However this is not the case as liberal nationalism has clearly been evident within the twentieth century. This can be seen in the growth of support for self-determination in Scotland in the latter half of the century, ultimately resulting in devolution of power.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work