• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Israel And Her Neighbours 1945 - c.1994.

Extracts from this document...


Israel And Her Neighbours 1945 - c.1994. Assignment 2. Question a. Source A shows two women demonstrating outside the Israeli Embassy in 1973. One of the women is a Palestinian Arab who was born in Palestine and the other is an American Jew who was born in America. They are holding signs which state how the rule of "right to return" affects them. The message they are trying to get across seems to be that it is unfair that an Arab who was born in Palestine and considers it his/her home should not be able to live there, while the Jew, born in America can. The fact that the two women are demonstrating side by side, and fighting for the same cause with the same views shows that the Jews and Arabs are not all that different and some are able to get along and agree. Source B is an extract taken from a historical book describing the great differences between Arabs and Jews. The writer's view is that the two peoples differ so much in language, religion, culture, conduct and social behaviour that they could not possibly live together as one nation. The messages of the two sources are quite conflicting, as source B states that "there is no common ground between them", meaning that they are so different in every way that it would be impossible for them to get along, while source A contradicts this and proves that it is possible for Arabs and Jews to agree, and to act together in the same way. ...read more.


However, as it is a piece of political propaganda written by Jewish politicians, so therefore biased towards the Jews. It is not a useful source if you want to know about the real feelings and ideas of ordinary Jewish people in Palestine and also the Arab point of view. Source G is by a Palestinian Arab writer who grew up in one of the refugee camps outside Israel. He is talking about the experience of ordinary Palestinian Arabs living for a long period in the refugee camps, and always longing to return to their homeland. I think it is much more useful that source F in helping us understand about the feelings of a lot of ordinary people involved in the conflict. It is useful as it could help us understand why so many Palestinians chose to stay un the camps instead of being given homes somewhere else, and why the Palestinian national feeling is still strong. It is a first hand account, which does not talk about pride and right of lands, only the wish to return. On the other hand, source G is just the opinion of one person while source F represents the views of a group of Jewish leaders. Both these sources do however, give us an insight into the nature of the problem, and help us to understand what was going through the minds of many people at the time. ...read more.


I believe that the Jews definitely deserve a homeland of their own, and as is mentioned in source F, Palestine is holly for the Jews but you have to consider that in 1948, it was not theirs to claim, as it was already the home of many more Palestinian Arabs. Taking all this into consideration it is very difficult to decide who has a greater claim to Palestine, as both sides have a strong argument. But it is the only home to people and it is not fair that either should be left without a home to return to. However, I still believe that the Arabs have a greater claim for the land, because although the Jews had lived their many centuries ago, and claim it was given to them by God, they had no right to take it from the current inhabitants in 1948. Nevertheless the fact that the Arabs have even less land now, I think is partly due to them, because their attempts to overthrow Israel failed numerous times, and because of these failures and constant hostility and threats to Israel and also the fact that Israel won. Israel was able to take other parts of Palestine that had belonged to the Arabs. This has made the situation much worse for now the Palestinian Arabs live in refugee camps along the boarder, with no really land to call their home. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Middle east section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Middle east essays

  1. Assess the effectiveness of the Arab and Israeli peace initiatives from the 1970s to ...

    Sadat's visit initiated peace negotiations between Israel and Egypt that went on sporadically through 1977 and into 1978. Reaching a deadlock, both Sadat and Begin accepted President Carter's invitation to a US - Israeli - Egyptian summit meeting at the Presidential retreat, Camp David (in Maryland) on September 5, 1978.

  2. Why was the State of Israel successfully established in 1948?

    and therefore can be seen as an vital factor in Israel's successful establishment. The traditional argument is that following the British pullout, the Israeli army had to be created almost from scratch to deal with attack from the Arab nations.

  1. What are the main differences between the beliefs of Palestinian Arabs and Israeli Jews?The ...

    That was one significant thing for the Palestinians. Their lives were now restricted, they were constantly under heavy police surveillance. Those who didn't live in the occupied territories had to flee to neighbouring Arab states as refugees, 250 000 went to Jordan alone. The Palestinians lost all faith in their support, The Arab states.

  2. Arab and Israeli conflict - source related study.

    When he phrases "in reality no such country exited" this shows that the Palestinians were fighting a war for no purpose. Source F is written from a history book and says that the PLO was not prepared and impatient. He also mentions that "These Palestinians achieved very little" showing that

  1. Middle east conflict - There have been several attempts to bring peace to this ...

    The destruction of the camps did cause outrage in Tel- Aviv where 250,000 protested to the Wars in the Middle East. By 1993, tensions between the Arabs and Israelis were at breaking point. The recent Intifada - a Palestinian rising was increasing fears among the Israelis that many would be killed by terrorists.

  2. British policy towards Palestine in the creation of Israel, one must carefully analyze British ...

    beginning blocks in creating complexity, tension and problems in the disputed territory of Palestine. The Zionist movement would use the disunity among the Arabs, at this time to there advantage in eventually creating a Jewish homeland. The final British pledge, and the one that formally committed the British to the Zionist cause, was the Balfour Declaration of November 1917.

  1. Why is it difficult to keep peace talks going in the Middle East?

    Economics Israel is wealthy since it has control of others are poor. Recently it has been said on Radio 4 that international involvement in the Middle East has caused many problems than it has solved. Do you agree with this statement?

  2. The role of International law in regards to The Palestinian Dilemma.

    The Sub-Committee stated that "the General Assembly is not competent to recommend, still less to enforce any solution other than the recognition of the independence of Palestine" and that "the settlement of the future government of Palestine is a matter solely for the people of Palestine..."

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work