• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Karl Heinrich Marx (1818 - 1883) grew up in an age of repression.

Extracts from this document...


The latter part of the nineteenth century was teeming with evolved social and economical ideas. These views of the social structure of industrial society came about through the development of ideals taken from past revolutions such as the Industrial Revolution which steamed ahead paving the way for growing commerce, and widened the gap between the classes. The development of a capitalist society was a very favorable goal in the eyes of the bourgeoisie. But it had negative implications on was the working-class and the proletarians who were exploited a great deal under the reign of capitalism. During this era of turmoil and anxiety, Karl Marx and Max Weber were two of the most influential sociologist. Both their views on the rise of capitalism have various similarities and differences. Karl Heinrich Marx (1818 - 1883) grew up in an age of repression. Marx's feeling of oppression was heightened by his family's conversion to Lutheranism just prior to his birth in order to escape the legal roadblocks and stigma of being Jewish (Pfohl 433). Marx thus was exposed to systematic discrimination and a strong desire to eliminate this oppressive system with a system that, instead of benefiting a select few, was concerned with the social welfare and social justice for all. ...read more.


Further bureaucratization and rationalization seemed to Weber an almost inescapable fate. Alienation on the same grounds is a subjective feeling, a feeling of individual powerlessness and detachment from self. In the 'Paris Manuscripts' (1844) Marx outlines four key forms of alienation, firstly, that the worker in the capitalist system has lost control of his labour, secondly, through the division of labour, thirdly, man is alienated because his work relationships with his co-workers is not one of natural human unity and fourthly, the worker is denied his true nature through the lack of self expression in his work. Marx's works have been fight against alienation to bring into being his essential political belief that communism is the true nature of humankind; his work is an attempt to battle the ideological superstructure of Capitalism and so he is fighting to relieve false consciousness. Exploitative relationships and false consciousness generated by alienation, made the worker feel like a commodity and thus, planted the seeds of Communism in Capitalism's very womb. 'A spectre is haunting Europe - the spectre of Communism.' (Taylor, 1967:78) For Marx man's labor is his self-expression and by alienating him from it, he is alienated from himself. Therefore both Marx and Weber agree that the new world of rationalized efficiency has turned into a monster that threatens to dehumanize its creators. ...read more.


Therefore, according to Weber, a person's class situation is basically their market situation. Weber identifies several other factors, which can determine group formation and the stratification of society. In particular, groups form because their members share a similar 'status situation.' Whereas class refers to the unequal distribution of economic rewards, status refers to unequal distribution of 'social honor.' Weber also identifies another important factor in determining social stratification, that of 'party.' Weber defines parties as groups, which are specifically concerned with influencing policies and making decisions in the interest of their membership - that is, they are concerned with the acquisition of 'social power.' While Marx argued that classes formed the only significant groups in society, Weber argued that the interplay of class, status and party led to the formation of social groups. Karl Marx and Max Weber's conceptions, lead them to very distinct conclusions about the rise of modern capitalism. Upon careful comparative analysis, a conclusion can be made about the extent to which these theorists are complementary or competing. Marx was too mechanistic, closed off to other causal factors besides that of the economic base. He took historical materialism and historical laws to an extreme and may have been stuck in the one-dimensionality of its causal chain. Weber, on the other hand, was quite ambivalent. He avoided making conclusions about the primacy or significance of certain variables and seemed to lack focus in this respect. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. What exactly is Weber's Protestant Ethic Thesis?

    God is promised to all who have faith in Jesus Christ and who live according to his teaching. During the Reformation in the 16th century, Martin Luther challenged the theory that salvation could be earned or secured by doing 'good works'.

  2. Socialist uses of workers' inquiry

    Pizzorno, together with a group of Italian militant-intellectuals, (including Romano Alquati and Danilo Montaldi7) would begin to transform and radicalise these methods between 1966 and 1967 applying them practically to struggles in the province of Cremona. During the sixties and the seventies, the use of the worker inquiry and co-research

  1. Compare and contrast Marx and Engels with Mill regarding social and economic progress

    who believes that it is the fact that we are conscious of our species, Marx and Engels believe that "productive life.....is species life". They believe that whilst animals produce to satisfy immediate needs, human beings produce free of any immediate needs and to Universal standards.

  2. Russia's Political Party System as an Obstacle to Democratization

    chances at the presidency, a strategy that was successful for the Unity Party since Primakov withdrew from the presidential race after the 1999 election. Neither Unity nor Fatherland-All Russia established well-defined identities within the electorate, as evidenced by the fact that a scant seven days before the election, focus groups

  1. Karl Marx's (1818 - 1883) theory of capitalism.

    Marx's critiques of the capitalist system - its tendency towards crises, the necessity of inequality - are still relevant today. The Dialectic Marx's powerful critique has as it basis a unique approach to reality - the dialectic. Taking from G.W.F.

  2. What did Karl Marx mean by 'exploitation' in a capitalist economic system?

    Marx continued their work. He rigidly proved and consistently developed this theory. He showed that the value of every commodity is determined by the quantity of socially necessary labour time spent on its production. (Giddens, 1983) Where the bourgeois economists saw a relation of things (the exchange of one commodity for another), Marx revealed a relation of men.

  1. Karl Marx' Exposed Life: Both Controversial and Scheming.

    A government left as dictator has no recourse to its competitors because it has no competitors and acts as the central controller, as would a monopoly, over all goods and services. This implies that Karl Marx ignored these facts when proposing his new socially driven society known as communism.

  2. Which theorist is most applicable to understanding work today, Marx, Weber or Durkheim?

    This appears to be occurring in work today. Workers who engage in the exhausting physical production rarely earn half of what the 'thinkers' earn. Therefore the transformation to a capitalist society (one similar to the society we live in today), as Marx believed it would, has distorted many aspects of society, including the notion of freedom.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work