• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Leadership styles

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

In this task I will describe leadership styles and their use in the uniformed public services. I will include examples of public service situations when each style may be used. I will also compare different leadership styles used in the uniformed public services, evaluate the effectiveness and draw conclusions about why this is the case and consider whether the styles make the team leader effective or not and why. Leadership Styles A leadership style is the manner and approach of providing direction for a team, implementing plans and motivating people to complete a task. There are several different leadership styles, each with advantages and disadvantages. The public services are constantly changing in response to changes in public expectations, the law and the current political environment and so the styles of leadership they use change and evolve too. Authoritarian leadership - is a very direct leadership style where the leader tells the team members what they must do. Sometimes this style is also described as autocratic. It is often considered a classic leadership style and is used when a leader wishes to retain as much power as possible and maintain control over the decision making process. It involves the leader telling the team members what they must do without any form of consultation or negotiation. Team members are expected to obey orders without receiving any explanation. Appropriate conditions when you might use this leadership style are: * You have all the information to solve the problem * You are working to a tight deadline * The team is well motivated and used to working for an authoritarian leader. ...read more.

Middle

In a public service context, a good example of this would be a murder enquiry where the supervising officer would employ a laissez-faire approach to a scene-of-crime officer or a forensic investigator. The experts know what they are there to do and can be safely left to get on with it, leaving the supervising officer free to attend to other tasks. Transactional leadership - is a very direct style of leadership and uses rewards and punishments to motivate the team. This is similar to autocratic but not as extreme, even though transactional leaders, like autocratic leaders, are direct and dominating and spend a great deal of time telling others what is expected of them. Transactional leaders are very common in businesses where people receive rewards such as bonuses, training or time off if they demonstrate good performance. Transactional leaders use conventional rewards and punishments to gain the support of their team. They create clear structures whereby it is obvious what is required of the team and what incentives they will receive if they follow orders (salary, benefits, promotion or praise). Team members who perform adequately or accomplish goals will be rewarded in some way that benefits their own self-interest. Those who don't perform or meet the standard required will be punished by the leader through the 'management by exception principle', whereby, rather than rewarding work, they will take corrective action against those who don't work to the required standards. Table: The advantages and disadvantages of transactional leadership. Advantages Disadvantages * The leader actively monitors the work and each individual's performance. * Leaders tend to be action oriented and focus on short-term tasks. ...read more.

Conclusion

A disadvantage of this is that it can focus so much on the well-being of the team that the job they do is neglected. Task-orientated - style is about getting the job done. The completion of the task rather than the needs of the team is the key goal. Task-orientated leaders focus mainly on getting the task done, whether it is structured or unstructured. They will define the work and the roles required, put structures in place, plan, organise and monitor with little thought for the well-being or needs of their teams. This approach can have many flaws, such as difficulties in motivating and retaining the team. This style of leadership is the opposite of people-orientated leadership. In practice, most leaders use both task-orientated and people-orientated styles of leadership. As an example, a police inspector organising crowd control at a football match may use a task-centred approach, but back at the station, when dealing with junior police officers, she might employ a people-centred approach. Appropriate style for the situation The public services receive their strategic plans either directly from a government ministry or they must draw up their own plans under the prevailing political will of the time. This means that even very senior officers often have no input into the goal setting of the organisation but are given authoritarian dictates that they have to impose on their employees. Despite this a public service leader must be ready to respond to the challenges and changes that they may arise in society with a whole range of leadership techniques that can be deployed singly or all at once. Public service leaders must be highly adaptable and comfortable using all styles of leadership. ?? ?? ?? ?? Leadership Styles ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

3 Stars - A very thorough, well organised and well written assignment that considers a wide range of points.
Where this piece could be improved is through more consistent use of practical examples that demonstrate the theoretical points. Also, with proof reading and editing it would become more apparent that there are passages that are repetitious.

Marked by teacher Dan Carter 26/09/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Impact of government policies

    3 star(s)

    They may be killed or seriously injured by the enemy, by civilians who resent the military presence or even by friendly fire. There is also an effect on the relatives of military personnel who may experience extreme worry and stress about their loved one.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    How effective is the British Constitution in protecting the rights of its citizens?

    3 star(s)

    Parliament has a close hold over the British Constitution. As discussed earlier it is uncodified and can therefore be amended by each party who holds a parliamentary term. Any amendment must first go through both houses of parliament before a Royal Assent finalises it and makes it into an Act.

  1. "Differences between power and authority"

    the power to influence the way in which people both think and even vote to such a great extent that sometimes politicians are seen to go to him before a general election and try to persuade him to portray their political party in a good light.

  2. The argument that the media have an effect on political attitudes and opinions is ...

    Again, there is not enough evidence to either conclusively prove or disprove this, but the available evidence points to it being more likely than unlikely, with the spate of ministerial and junior ministerial resignations after newspaper revelations about them suggesting the validity of this theory.

  1. To what extent is Labour still a Socialist Party?

    The party held power for 16 years; from 1945-1979, but the Tories were in power and the party split between the left-wing of the party, represented by Michael Foot and Tony Benn, and the right-wing of the party, represented by Denis Healey, who had said that the party was moving too far towards the left, making it potentially unelectable.

  2. "Parliament carries out none of it's function adequately". Discuss

    Another function of Parliament is scrutiny - to check that the government does its job: govern. This is, arguably, the most important function, as it is responsible for calling the government to account and ensuring a responsible government. Parliament attempts to scrutinise the government in a number of ways.

  1. How far was New Labor influenced by Thatcher?

    Jones does provide a factual and impartial argument using evidence to support both sides of the debate regarding Tony Blair?s ideological stance. Making the source extremely valuable. Nevertheless, despite these differences that existed in policy detail which is explored by Jones, the ideological stance of New Labour overall tended to

  2. Northern Ireland. Assess the view that MLAs have been effective in holding the ...

    Statutory Committees are concerned chiefly with shadowing each Executive Department. They work on scrutinising legislation, Ministers and Departments. They also look over proposed legislation and add amendments. From 2010 to March 2013 12 Bills passed through the committee stage of the legislative process.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work