• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Liberalism has a dual commitment both to individual freedom and equality. How does liberalism try to reconcile these two commitments? Does it succeed? Can freedom and equality really co-exist?

Extracts from this document...


Liberalism has a dual commitment both to individual freedom and equality. How does liberalism try to reconcile these two commitments? Does it succeed? Can freedom and equality really co-exist? The ideas of liberalism have been around for more than three hundred years and inevitably these ideas have changed over time. These changes led to the development of two strands of liberalism, which are referred to as 'classical liberalism' and 'modern liberalism'. These two liberal traditions clashed over their views on certain aspects of society, particularly on the role of the state. Many key political ideas were derived from liberalism, both classical and modern. The work of the classical liberalist Adam Smith on protections in international and national trade could be clearly seen in Margaret Thatcher's economic policies and ideas on the free market. Her ideas on the role that the state should play in society also followed a classical liberalist approach. Due to the emergence of the two strands the ideology of liberalism was now subject to inherent contradictory beliefs. ...read more.


This would cause a severe inequality. Under this example the two cannot co-exist, one must give way to the other. For example, if one man wants to kill another man, it is impossible for both men to have absolute freedom of choice. It is this which led modern liberals to the conclusion that, the very existence of freedoms leads to a necessity for restrictions. If equal restrictions are placed on each and every individual then perhaps it becomes possible for freedom and equality to co-exist. Individual freedom itself provides a commitment to equality. The belief that all individuals are born equal is embedded in a set of basic and irrefutable human rights. All liberals unite in the belief that individuals should not be disadvantaged in society on the grounds of gender, class or ethnicity and that every individual should be granted equal legal and political equality. It is clear that liberals believe that every individual must have an equal opportunity to achieve success. ...read more.


A huge obstacle on the narrow path to deciding whether individual freedom and equality can really co-exist is the presence of both conservative and socialist ideas which both help lay the foundation of liberalism. This mixture of ideologies within liberalism has led commentators to argue that it is best described as a "general attitude and not a distinct set of political beliefs2". Perhaps the most accepted answer in modern society is that individual freedom and equality do co-exist to an extent. However, many would argue that it is impossible to achieve individual freedom and equality unless all wealth including property was redistributed first. Others would disagree claiming that the cream would always rise to the top and even after wealth had been redistributed and freedom and equality co-existed successfully an elite would once again come to be in a better position due to the theory of meritocracy. Perhaps it is best to see individual freedom and equality co-existing as much as they can and at certain times maybe one has more influence over the other, interchangeably. Thank you 1 Heywood 2 Freeden pg 141 ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How and to what extent has modern liberalism departed from the ideas of classical ...

    5 star(s)

    Although classical liberals believed in equality before the law, they were decidedly sceptical of any attempt to create material equality, and indeed believed that inequality was inevitable. This viewpoint persevered until well into the 1800s, and was reflected in public opinion - in 1859 Samuel Smiles famously wrote that "heaven

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Analyse the similarities and differences between Classical and Modern Liberalism

    4 star(s)

    in the form of benefits people ion the basis of race, colour, gender or religion. They therefore have both legal and political equality resulting in equality before the law; "one person, one vote; one vote, one values." Liberals claim that people should have 'equality of opportunity' as thus have the same chance to rise or fall in society.

  1. Distinguish between negative and positive freedom and explain the implications of each for the ...

    Furthermore, since Liberals believe the key function of government is to protect individual's natural rights, namely the right to 'life, liberty and property", it should not interfere in men's private matters. This emphasises the separation of "public" and "private" matters, which Liberals see as vital.

  2. How and to what extent, have modern liberals departed from the ideas of classical ...

    It is the opposite of negative freedom as the working class would be no longer held back. Unlike negative freedom positive freedom removed the external constraints from the individual and it aims to empower the individual and safeguard the people against social evils.

  1. How far has Modern Liberalism departed form Classical Liberalism?

    However, there is a consistent view that there needs to be a society where individuals can fulfil their potential. Therefore, it is clear that modern liberalism has, on this issue, departed by quite an extent from the classical liberal beliefs.

  2. Notes on John Stuart Mill's On Liberty

    to this procedure and it is not possible to tell who those people are (or even what percentage of the population will have that reaction). In such a case, it would be a bad idea to risk this procedure - and it would surely be wrong to impose such a

  1. Liberalism has a dual commitment both to individual freedom and equality. How does liberalism ...

    Equality is achieved in society when all individuals are of the same merit. To achieve equality is to reach a state of sameness, balance and fairness.2 Liberalism commits itself to both individual freedom and to equality. A big problem with this is that a classical liberal would hold a different

  2. How and why does Locke explain the creation, value and protection of property?

    in serving the people and that there must not be parental, that is absolute authority. Yolton explains this like so, "If royal authority is derived from parental authority ... there would be as many kings as fathers... from parental power it necessarily follows either that that all fathers have royal

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work