• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Marx & Engels Materialist Theory Of History.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Marx & Engels Materialist Theory Of History In 1859, in the preface to his Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy, Marx wrote that the hypothesis that had served him as the basis for his analysis of society could be briefly formulated as follows: "In the social production that men carry on, they enter into definite relations that are indispensable and independent of their will, relations of production which correspond to a definite stage of development of their material forces of production. The sum total of these relations of production constitutes the economic structure of society, the real foundation, on which rises a legal and political superstructure, and to which correspond definite forms of social consciousness. The mode of production in material life determines the general character of the social, political, and intellectual processes of life. It is not the consciousness of men which determines their existence; it is on the contrary their social existence which determines their consciousness." This hypothesis was later called Historical Materialism. Marx applied it to capitalist society, both in The Communist Manifesto and The German Ideology. Basically he comments that social reality is composed in this way; beneath everything in society lays the real basis of society, economic structure (infrastructure). Marx starts with the observation that in order to survive humans must produce food and material objects, we therefore must enter into social relationships. ...read more.

Middle

Feudalism followed this, one rich owner had a lot of land that needed to be farmed and worked. He would employ serfs (peasants) to work the land and in return they would receive a meagre wage and accommodation. This wage would have been food and water and other very basic necessities. Capitalism was the next epoch. Capitalism is about profit and increasing profit. Most of the means of production are privately owned and production is guided and income distributed largely through the operation of markets. People work for a wage, and with this wage they can purchase items for consumption. In capitalism whatever is needed more at the time is worth more (supply and demand). Communism, the final epoch is a system of political and economic organization in which property is owned by the state and all citizens share in the common wealth, more or less according to their need. Karl Marx successfully predicted Capitalism and his materialist theory of history seems to work. It is almost poetic in its simplicity. The theory flows as if he had not created it, it was the truth and had always been. But there are limitations to his theory. Historical Materialism is a body of knowledge based on observation. An epoch will develop into a new one, thesis, antithesis and then synthesis, followed by a new epoch. ...read more.

Conclusion

Libertarians assert the freedom of will and go directly against Marx's theory, which is deterministic. Contemporary libertarians cite quantum physics and "the principle of uncertainty" as evidence that determinism is false. Marx and Engels theory of history was the basis for their whole work, and has therefore changed the face of the world forever. The Soviet Union was under communism for many years, from 1922 until 1991, and this republic as played a major role in the history of the world. Arguably the main Country in ending Hitler and Nazi Germany, after their heroics at Stalingrad. Whatever flaws can be seen in Marx's philosophy, it was enough to scare the US into a war. The cold war was the US fearingthe Marxis Soviet Union, and suspecting that they had much power. Enough power to threaten the mighty USA. However, Communism failed in the Soviet Union, this could be down to the basic flaws in the theory. Historical Materilamsm was the basis and was not 100%. But the Soviet Union did not engage capitalism. They skipped an epoch and went straight from feudal to communism. Its could be argued that this is why it failed. The Communist state was a Utopia, destined to fail by defintion. Utopia comes from the greek word ou, meaning "not" and topos, meaning "a place". "Not a place". An alluring idealogy and theory of history, yet not workable in reality. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. What exactly is Weber's Protestant Ethic Thesis?

    This emphasis on the importance of a fixed calling provided an ethical justification of the modern specialised division of labour - an undeniable characteristic of capitalist economies. In addition, utter devotion to work also ensured that the individual's time was not wasted through sociability, idleness or other worldly pursuits.

  2. A Study of Carl Rogers' Theory of Personality

    However, some studies have found that openness to experience and organismic trusting did not intercorrelate, contrary to expectations (Pearson, 1969, 1974; cited in Maddi, 1996).

  1. Marxism - political theory

    The primary reason for exchange is to obtain a commodity for use. Under capitalism, money is used to purchase a commodity, which is then sold to create a greater amount of money (M1 - C - M2). The purpose of this form of exchange is to create greater and greater sums of money.

  2. Assess the merits and limitations of the ideas of Karl Marx

    Also 'The Growth of Social Mobility': The class system does appear to have some form of Meritocracy, where individuals can move between classes, most often this is intergenerational between occupations. Finally 'The Growth of Equality', both Social and economic, have been reduced both through the Welfare State and the Human Rights Act, 1998.

  1. Marxism, Idealism and Nationalism

    Freedom to express one's feelings on nationalism comes hand in hand with these ideologies. If we are able to support our views on freedom of rights, we, society, must recognize all the nationalistic views that exist. These views should be recognized as constructive suggestions on preserving the unique societies of the world.

  2. What did Karl Marx mean by 'exploitation' in a capitalist economic system?

    A modern aspect of exploitation is due to the recent rise in globalisation and the growth of trans national corporations in the last thirty years. These global corporations have grown in size and influence while the worldwide trade union movement remains unable to deliver any meaningful protection to workers in corrupt countries where the rule of law is not respected.

  1. How did Marx conceive the transition from capitalism to communism?

    For the reasons mentioned above Marx believed that the transition could not be as smooth as to shift directly from Capitalism to Communism. The socialist stage would therefore come in between for as long as class antagonism continued. The period of socialism as Marx would describe would be the dictatorship

  2. Why did Marx and Engels believe that history was on their side?

    One can see here the origins of the modern dispute about the effects of automation. By and large, technological advance seems not to have caused widespread unemployment. But the issue is repressed in most modern growth theory, which simply assumes full employment.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work