• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Marx & Engels Materialist Theory Of History.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Marx & Engels Materialist Theory Of History In 1859, in the preface to his Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy, Marx wrote that the hypothesis that had served him as the basis for his analysis of society could be briefly formulated as follows: "In the social production that men carry on, they enter into definite relations that are indispensable and independent of their will, relations of production which correspond to a definite stage of development of their material forces of production. The sum total of these relations of production constitutes the economic structure of society, the real foundation, on which rises a legal and political superstructure, and to which correspond definite forms of social consciousness. The mode of production in material life determines the general character of the social, political, and intellectual processes of life. It is not the consciousness of men which determines their existence; it is on the contrary their social existence which determines their consciousness." This hypothesis was later called Historical Materialism. Marx applied it to capitalist society, both in The Communist Manifesto and The German Ideology. Basically he comments that social reality is composed in this way; beneath everything in society lays the real basis of society, economic structure (infrastructure). Marx starts with the observation that in order to survive humans must produce food and material objects, we therefore must enter into social relationships. ...read more.

Middle

Feudalism followed this, one rich owner had a lot of land that needed to be farmed and worked. He would employ serfs (peasants) to work the land and in return they would receive a meagre wage and accommodation. This wage would have been food and water and other very basic necessities. Capitalism was the next epoch. Capitalism is about profit and increasing profit. Most of the means of production are privately owned and production is guided and income distributed largely through the operation of markets. People work for a wage, and with this wage they can purchase items for consumption. In capitalism whatever is needed more at the time is worth more (supply and demand). Communism, the final epoch is a system of political and economic organization in which property is owned by the state and all citizens share in the common wealth, more or less according to their need. Karl Marx successfully predicted Capitalism and his materialist theory of history seems to work. It is almost poetic in its simplicity. The theory flows as if he had not created it, it was the truth and had always been. But there are limitations to his theory. Historical Materialism is a body of knowledge based on observation. An epoch will develop into a new one, thesis, antithesis and then synthesis, followed by a new epoch. ...read more.

Conclusion

Libertarians assert the freedom of will and go directly against Marx's theory, which is deterministic. Contemporary libertarians cite quantum physics and "the principle of uncertainty" as evidence that determinism is false. Marx and Engels theory of history was the basis for their whole work, and has therefore changed the face of the world forever. The Soviet Union was under communism for many years, from 1922 until 1991, and this republic as played a major role in the history of the world. Arguably the main Country in ending Hitler and Nazi Germany, after their heroics at Stalingrad. Whatever flaws can be seen in Marx's philosophy, it was enough to scare the US into a war. The cold war was the US fearingthe Marxis Soviet Union, and suspecting that they had much power. Enough power to threaten the mighty USA. However, Communism failed in the Soviet Union, this could be down to the basic flaws in the theory. Historical Materilamsm was the basis and was not 100%. But the Soviet Union did not engage capitalism. They skipped an epoch and went straight from feudal to communism. Its could be argued that this is why it failed. The Communist state was a Utopia, destined to fail by defintion. Utopia comes from the greek word ou, meaning "not" and topos, meaning "a place". "Not a place". An alluring idealogy and theory of history, yet not workable in reality. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. M-theory is a solution proposed for the unknown theory of everything

    This lends an inference that they must end on a preferred surface. Superficially, this notion seems to break the relativistic invariance of the theory, possibly leading to a paradox. The resolution of this paradox is that strings end on a p-dimensional dynamic object, the Dp-brane.

  2. Compare and contrast Marx and Engels with Mill regarding social and economic progress

    However Marx clearly points out that the problem does not lie in anything spiritual but is within society itself; therefore society would need to be re-organised in order for bargaining to be abolished and this problem on 'The Jewish Question' would be resolved.

  1. How did Marx conceive the transition from capitalism to communism?

    Stalin thereafter achieved rapid industrialization and total eradication of private enterprise. This building of socialism conformed more closely to Marx's theories as the did not contained any centralized or mixed economics as in Lenin's period. In 1929 agriculture was collectivized, and farmers had to work on collectivized, or common, land.

  2. What did Karl Marx mean by 'exploitation' in a capitalist economic system?

    These examples emphasise that a capitalist system, which Marx suggested, is definitely still in existence. Marx did not predict, however, that capitalism would be around up until now and he believed that capitalism would eventually collapse into a new form of socialism.

  1. What exactly is Weber's Protestant Ethic Thesis?

    It also satisfies Protestant asceticism, as the worker is fully committed to the work that God called him to do. The importance of each worker having his own calling was a prominent feature of the Protestant Ethic. Outside of a calling his work might be considered casual and irregular, and

  2. Karl Marx was the greatest thinker and philosopher of his time. His views on ...

    Marx is considerate to be the greater of the two philosophies. The one contrast was the way in which one solved problems. Marx would use historical research to solve a problem, as apposed Engles who used his imagination and pure mind to come about a solution.

  1. A Study of Carl Rogers' Theory of Personality

    While Rogers sees the common human condition as one of incongruence between self and experience, this does not minimize his ultimate belief in the autonomy of human beings. Rogers (1977, p15) sees the human being as: "capable of evaluating the outer and inner situation, understanding herself in its context, making

  2. Examine the history of and different types of Anarchism

    Anti-statism Anarchism is the negation of the principle of authority. It sees authority as an offence against the principles of freedom and equality. It corrupts those who exercise it and oppresses those who are subject to it. In the words of Pierre-Joseph Proudhon: ?To be governed is to be watched

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work