• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Membership to the EU and Loss of Sovereignty

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Shape of the Modern World (Political History) - Task 6 After previous vetoed applications in 1961 and 1967 to what was then known as the European Economic Community (ECC), Britain was finally allowed to join the European Union (EU) in 1973 after becoming a signatory to the Treaty of Rome, under Labour Prime Minister Edward Heath. Since this however, some critics have argued that membership to the EU has led to a significant loss of parliamentary sovereignty. The term sovereignty refers to the right of a state to pass laws within its own territory or as Hinsley (1966) described, "The idea that there is a final and absolute authority in the political community". In this case, it could be the belief of some people that too much power has been transferred from our government to the EU - an organisation made up of mainly appointed representatives as oppose to being elected. ...read more.

Middle

College of Europe in Bruges, that Britain had surrendered too much sovereignty, even though there were less than half as many member states as there is nowadays. There may be more who share Margaret Thatcher's view now there are 27 member states altogether, with the possibility of more being added soon. The more states that join however may result in it becoming more difficult to become an integrationist society as the entire process would be slowed down. In other words, it is simpler for a handful of states to integrate as oppose to 27 states. Whether in favour of or against membership to the EU, it is common for people to argue that the concept of parliamentary sovereignty is a myth, and that the decision making process is firmly in the hands of the Government instead of parliament. ...read more.

Conclusion

For example, large international organisations such as General Motors could be seen as above national law as they can decide where in the world they want to locate, and parliament will want them in our country providing jobs etc. The organisation may therefore be able to negotiate the terms in which they base themselves in the UK which undermines sovereignty. Also, with people being able to freely move from country to country and even access the globe via the internet, it has become increasing difficult to control what goes on it the country. The growth of terrorism, which is present around the world, provides an enormous threat to a lot of nations and their sovereignty, whilst a rise in human rights has also restricted authority and put more power in the hands of the people. If it's true what some people believe, and that parliamentary sovereignty is a myth or just an outdated concept, then membership to the EU cannot sacrifice it. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

4/5 This is a good essay. It makes a number of relevant points, communicates a good amount of information, and is well written. It would benefit from a stronger structure and argument communicated in the introduction and throughout. It could also benefit from more detailed consideration of the meaning of sovereignty, and potential benefits of surrendering or pooling it (and, which it is in the case of the EU).

Marked by teacher Grace Thomas 24/04/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Has the creation of the Single European Market been a success?

    4 star(s)

    high politics of decision making.5 The Common Agriculture Policy, as Dennis Swann pointed out, "its original creation was an outstanding political achievement, and without such a developed common policy the EC would have became less integrated institution"6 and its existence gave the EC a forum for collective international policy making,

  2. Why did Britain join the EEC in 1973 and not in 1957?

    With the lowering interest in the Commonwealth around 1955 and without the Soviet threat Britain should have re-evaluated its world position and found that it needed to take its place as part of Europe. He supports the view that Britain did 'miss the bus' into Europe because Britain did not realise that it should have taken a place in Europe.

  1. Why did the witch-craze happen in Early Modern Europe?

    of pagan Gods, for example; the goatee, the cloven feet, the horns, and the wrinkled skin 4. This connection between the perceived increase in Satan's power and the first witchcraft trials in the 15th Century indicates the influence of religion on the witch-craze in Early Modern Europe.

  2. To What Extent Does the EU Display a 'Democratic Deficit'?

    In elections, candidates stand for national parties, e.g., in the UK we have the Labour and Conservative parties putting forward candidates for the EP elections, but join European wide parties (or multinational political groups) in the EP itself. For example, the Conservatives sit with the European People's Party (EPP)

  1. Consequences of lack of self discipline:Here I am going to look at the police ...

    Incidents like the ones I have written about have serious consequences in the ways society view the police force. The public would loose respect for the force, and therefore loose part of the authority they have which in turn would make policing in the area harder.

  2. How successful was the League of Nations in the 1920's?

    They wanted peace through collective security. The idea was for each country to feel safer but this did not seem to happen, partly because of the lack of armed forces and the league had no effective way of making the countries comply with their decisions.

  1. To what extent have international courts and tribunals been successful in upholding human rights?

    This is a clear example of how international courts and tribunals can be effective in upholding human rights. However there are still several limitations to International tribunals. For example the same Tribunal for the crimes against the former Yugoslavia failed to charge any politicians related to the NATO invasion, despite

  2. Discuss the view that there is little difference between the basic values of the ...

    This was known as the modernisation of the Labour party and led to the birth of New Labour. This broke the party?s core values and broke any remaining links between Labour and Socialism. Furthermore, the Labour and Conservatives have both approached a catch all type approach when making policies.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work