• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Membership to the EU and Loss of Sovereignty

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Shape of the Modern World (Political History) - Task 6 After previous vetoed applications in 1961 and 1967 to what was then known as the European Economic Community (ECC), Britain was finally allowed to join the European Union (EU) in 1973 after becoming a signatory to the Treaty of Rome, under Labour Prime Minister Edward Heath. Since this however, some critics have argued that membership to the EU has led to a significant loss of parliamentary sovereignty. The term sovereignty refers to the right of a state to pass laws within its own territory or as Hinsley (1966) described, "The idea that there is a final and absolute authority in the political community". In this case, it could be the belief of some people that too much power has been transferred from our government to the EU - an organisation made up of mainly appointed representatives as oppose to being elected. ...read more.

Middle

College of Europe in Bruges, that Britain had surrendered too much sovereignty, even though there were less than half as many member states as there is nowadays. There may be more who share Margaret Thatcher's view now there are 27 member states altogether, with the possibility of more being added soon. The more states that join however may result in it becoming more difficult to become an integrationist society as the entire process would be slowed down. In other words, it is simpler for a handful of states to integrate as oppose to 27 states. Whether in favour of or against membership to the EU, it is common for people to argue that the concept of parliamentary sovereignty is a myth, and that the decision making process is firmly in the hands of the Government instead of parliament. ...read more.

Conclusion

For example, large international organisations such as General Motors could be seen as above national law as they can decide where in the world they want to locate, and parliament will want them in our country providing jobs etc. The organisation may therefore be able to negotiate the terms in which they base themselves in the UK which undermines sovereignty. Also, with people being able to freely move from country to country and even access the globe via the internet, it has become increasing difficult to control what goes on it the country. The growth of terrorism, which is present around the world, provides an enormous threat to a lot of nations and their sovereignty, whilst a rise in human rights has also restricted authority and put more power in the hands of the people. If it's true what some people believe, and that parliamentary sovereignty is a myth or just an outdated concept, then membership to the EU cannot sacrifice it. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

4/5 This is a good essay. It makes a number of relevant points, communicates a good amount of information, and is well written. It would benefit from a stronger structure and argument communicated in the introduction and throughout. It could also benefit from more detailed consideration of the meaning of sovereignty, and potential benefits of surrendering or pooling it (and, which it is in the case of the EU).

Marked by teacher Grace Thomas 24/04/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "'A troublesome partner.' Using examples, to what extent would you say this comment accurately ...

    4 star(s)

    This all, not surprisingly, stems from Britian's initial main reasons to join the European Union. The first predominating reason for the UK's integration was that it was 'essential to reverse severe economic decline' and 'maintain global power status.' 1 The second, was obviously sign up for a 'club' that entailed

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Should Britain Join the Euro

    I can only hope that Gordon Brown and Tony Blair fully appreciate how much more important this decision is than whether or not Labour are re-elected. Discuss the Advantages and Disadvantages of European Monetary Union Advantages of the European Monetary Union?

  1. Why did Britain join the EEC in 1973 and not in 1957?

    not getting involved in the talks at Messina, or if Britain chose not to get the 'bus'. Lord Bullock, Bevin's biographer believed Britain had 'miss the bus' when they missed out on the talks at Messina. John Young agreed with this view, because he believed that when the 'Six' discussed

  2. To What Extent Does the EU Display a 'Democratic Deficit'?

    In elections, candidates stand for national parties, e.g., in the UK we have the Labour and Conservative parties putting forward candidates for the EP elections, but join European wide parties (or multinational political groups) in the EP itself. For example, the Conservatives sit with the European People's Party (EPP)

  1. Which EU institution is the most powerful

    In addition to overseeing EU law the Commission makes sure that all EU revenues are collected and performs a significant role in drafting and guiding the annual budget through the Council of Ministers and the European Parliament. The Commission also has the power to introduce onto national government policies that

  2. Why did the witch-craze happen in Early Modern Europe?

    The mere belief in witchcraft was not sufficient; it was the belief that they could harm others and reject their Christian faith that was the cause for concern. However, the question of how these ideas came into play still remains.

  1. Discuss the view that there is little difference between the basic values of the ...

    The party favours spending to modernize Britain and its infrastructure and to support business in creating new jobs. Labour also favours a slight tax increase. The Conservative Party, in contrast, favours broader cuts in government spending, including a freeze on public sector pay increases and a 5 percent cut in salaries for government ministers.

  2. To what extent have international courts and tribunals been successful in upholding human rights?

    This is a clear example of how international courts and tribunals can be effective in upholding human rights. However there are still several limitations to International tribunals. For example the same Tribunal for the crimes against the former Yugoslavia failed to charge any politicians related to the NATO invasion, despite

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work