• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Merely a 'bargainer in chief'." Is this a fair assessment of the American president?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Merely a 'bargainer in chief'." Is this a fair assessment of the American president? "The power of the president is the power to persuade", said Richard Nuestadt. Bill Clinton is a recent example, not America's best ever policy maker, a weak first term and a sex scandal would have signaled the end for most, but 'Slick Willie's' ability to talk his way into and out of a situation have ensured he be remembered as one of the USA's most successful presidents of all time. But if a president doesn't have persuasive powers, are they destined for failure? Is the president 'merely bargainer in chief' or can he or she be an effective president with minimal oratol skills? Due to stringent checks and balances on presidential power (laid down in the constitution by the founding fathers in 1789) the presidents powers are restricted in certain areas of his decision making. ...read more.

Middle

The members of the EXOP often bargain with congressmen and 'strike deals' to confirm their support for the presidents policy. The British system, however, has no such bargaining tactics, although the Prime Minister can influence the House of Commons decision through the media and public opinion, the veto and his own private office of officials to persuade for him (EXOP) do not exist - although one could argue these are unnecessary in Britain as the power to persuade is far less important than in the USA. Other branches of government that the president often bargains with are the supreme court and individual states. The president has absolutely no power over the supreme court, and therefore, cannot bargain effectively with them at all. He, too, has little power of individual states, but he gets round this by striking bargains and with bribes, for instance the president will secure a state decision by promising to launch his election campaign in the states capital. ...read more.

Conclusion

President's can do as little or as much as they please, and their appearance and power to persuade the American people is what they are remembered for. In the early 90's (1992 - 1996) Bill Clintons first term was a failure. He promised health and gun reforms among others. 4 years after being elected, he had achieved little, yet he was able to persuade the American people to vote him in again, and in his next 4 years he did make an impact. You can say that it was the economy that got Clinton reelected, it's strength at the time of the election, but it still needed a presentable, articulate persuader to convince the people that he was the man for them. Summing up, I believe there are many factors to being a successful president, and no, not all of them are persuasive ones. However, I believe, to take advantage of the situations you are faced with, as a President you must be able to bargain your way to achieving your goal and getting the very best outcome from the most daunting situation. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. How far does the president only have the power to pursuade

    While these may indeed require Congressional approval, the Constitution actually states that Congress must only object if the nominee is truly not fit for the job, and not on the basis of ideological preference. For example many Republican members of Congress were criticised for opposing the nomination of Elena Kegan

  2. 'The President faces considerable constraints in domestic policy in comparison to the UK Prime ...

    UK law must not contravene the E.C.H.R, in much the same way the Supreme Court must deem that USA law 'constitutional', but these institutions rarely have to intervene, (although the Supreme Court revoked the Flag Desecration Act for being unconstitutional)

  1. Difference in the Prime Minister and President

    Hence forth, the Prime Minister usually finds proposed legislation passed with ease if they have a strong majority in the House of Commons. The only opposition they may find is from the House of Lords whom can delay a bill for one year.

  2. To what extent is it fair to say America is a land of 100 ...

    They will intervene to help the disadvantaged but not at the risk of alienating other Social Groups who support them and therefore the aim of the party is more around gaining votes in which the winner takes all in the First Past the Post system rather than pursuing a left of centre agenda.

  1. presidential power how far does it go

    Now there should be a distinction into what was authorized by the executive branch, what was actually carried out in the detention centers and what was eventually admitted to and or defended by the administration. These distinctions will be clarified in the following section.

  2. A Passage of a Bill Through the American and Canadian Governments

    If it is "approved in principle," and it usually is, Guy remarks, the "child" is then considered by the appropriate standing committee, where it is given a clause-by-clause examination. It should be noted that money bills, unlike other bills, are not considered by standing committees, but go before the Committee of the Whole.

  1. The power of the President is limited to the power to persuade. Discuss.

    For instance, despite the President?s ?special and pronounced? powers in regards to foreign policy, he still requires the support of Congress before declaring war or signing treaties. This has led to anomalies such as the Vietnam War, which was never really a war; and the Treaty of Versailles, which was

  2. How far do you agree the USA remains a global hegemony today?

    least the capability of a nation to compete on the world market. The United States demonstrates substantial leadership in research and development in terms of total dollars spent. In 1997, the United States spent some $189.4 billion on resources and development.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work